[sage-release] were ubuntu 14.04 binaries of 7.0 meant to work on any x86_64 CPU?

2016-05-11 Thread Dima Pasechnik
It appears that this report https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-support/fseE3_tQoQE/BCbFrskFCgAJ is an indication that these binaries are slightly broken; namely, an optional package csdp compiled on it gets faulty executables (they use blas/lapack/atlas in a nontrivial way). Could it be that

[sage-release] Re: Reverting blacklisting of GCC 4.8 (#20231)

2016-05-11 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
+1 for still supporting GCC 4.8 for a while (unless it's very troublesome): this is the GCC version of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, which is officially supported until April 2019. Eric. Le mercredi 11 mai 2016 17:40:44 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > > Hello Volker, > > would it be okay for you to

[sage-release] Re: Reverting blacklisting of GCC 4.8 (#20231)

2016-05-11 Thread Volker Braun
If you make a ticket then I'm happy to merge it... On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 5:40:44 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Hello Volker, > > would it be okay for you to revert Trac #20231 in Sage 7.2? The reason > for blacklisting GCC 4.8 was to support #20226, but that's not going to > be

[sage-release] Reverting blacklisting of GCC 4.8 (#20231)

2016-05-11 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Hello Volker, would it be okay for you to revert Trac #20231 in Sage 7.2? The reason for blacklisting GCC 4.8 was to support #20226, but that's not going to be merged in Sage 7.2. So maybe it's best to still support GCC 4.8 in Sage 7.2 (maybe with a deprecation warning in configure.ac).