Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.5.beta5 released

2016-12-02 Thread Justin C. Walker
> On Dec 1, 2016, at 15:15 , Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from tarball on macOS

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta5 released

2016-12-02 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 7:22:05 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote: > > Just for kicks, I tried building with SAGE_CHECK=yes. (Do any of the > buildbots do this?) > > On two different OS X machines, 10.11 and 10.12, two : > The end of this should have said "two packages failed their

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.5.beta5 released

2016-12-02 Thread John H Palmieri
Just for kicks, I tried building with SAGE_CHECK=yes. (Do any of the buildbots do this?) On two different OS X machines, 10.11 and 10.12, two : Error building Sage. The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily during this run of 'make all'): * package: cython-0.25.1.p0

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.5.beta5 released

2016-12-02 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Le vendredi 2 décembre 2016 02:06:29 UTC+1, François a écrit : > > Can please people stop using files in SAGE_SRC at runtime and people > stop reviewing such things positively unless there is absolutely no > choices. > Indeed. Reading the rest of the thread so far show that it's important.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.5.beta5 released

2016-12-02 Thread Erik Bray
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:06 AM, François Bissey wrote: > Can please people stop using files in SAGE_SRC at runtime and people > stop reviewing such things positively unless there is absolutely no > choices. > > In sage/plot/plot3d/base.pyx we have line 410 and