Re: [sage-release] Re: Why is gcc built?

2017-02-23 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/23/2017 05:57 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Sorry, but I do not like your idea. I don't feel like being forced to run > > ./configure --with-gcc --with-zlib --with-mpir --with-r --with-glpk > --with-git --with-ppl --with-pari --with-libgap ... # 80 packages more > > just because I don't have

Re: [sage-release] Re: Why is gcc built?

2017-02-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
one can still have something like: --with-everything # build everything --with-everythingneeded # build missing etc... to encode the most usual cases. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei

Re: [sage-release] Re: Why is gcc built?

2017-02-23 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Sorry, but I do not like your idea. I don't feel like being forced to run ./configure --with-gcc --with-zlib --with-mpir --with-r --with-glpk --with-git --with-ppl --with-pari --with-libgap ... # 80 packages more just because I don't have those packages on my system. -- You received this mess

[sage-release] Re: Why is gcc built?

2017-02-23 Thread Simon King
Hi Erik, On 2017-02-23, Erik Bray wrote: > IMHO building Sage should not just forge ahead with building its own > gcc without asking. I think it's bad enough that it's a package at > all, but as long as it is it should be strictly optional, and if the > version check fails for gcc/gfortran the b

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.6.beta4 released

2017-02-23 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
This is a bug in Pynac, see * https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22421 * https://github.com/pynac/pynac/issues/231 On 2017-02-22 08:16, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: sage -t --long src/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx ** File "src/sage/symbol

Re: [sage-release] Re: Why is gcc built?

2017-02-23 Thread Erik Bray
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Simon King wrote: > PS: > > On 2017-02-22, Simon King wrote: >> Aha. Although I did "apt-get install gcc-fortran", gfortran is not there. > > And the reason is that apparently I didn't read the development manual > with enough care. It advises to install gfortran

[sage-release] Re: Why is gcc built?

2017-02-23 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Hi Simon, Le mercredi 22 février 2017 18:26:52 UTC+1, Simon King a écrit : > > But Ubuntu does not known > either gfortan5 nor gfortran5. > > Actually, it is gfortran-5, sorry for the typo (full name of the Ubuntu package: gfortran-5 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.2). I'll correct the wiki page accordi