Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta5 released

2018-11-28 Thread François Bissey
This is definitely it. It introduced the doctests in question. I guess I should have provided that extra info. > On 28/11/2018, at 22:11, fchapot...@gmail.com wrote: > > Could be caused by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26702 > > Le mercredi 28 novembre 2018 09:49:53 UTC+1, François Bissey a

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta5 released

2018-11-28 Thread fchapoton2
Could be caused by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26702 Le mercredi 28 novembre 2018 09:49:53 UTC+1, François Bissey a écrit : > > That’s interesting. I thought the failures in sage/databases/sql_db.py in > sage-on-gentoo > were due to the use of a newer version of sqlite. But if you see it

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta5 released

2018-11-28 Thread François Bissey
That’s interesting. I thought the failures in sage/databases/sql_db.py in sage-on-gentoo were due to the use of a newer version of sqlite. But if you see it too that must be something more subtle. François > On 28/11/2018, at 21:46, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > On Ubuntu 16.04, the command >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta5 released

2018-11-28 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 16.04, the command sage -t --all --optional=sage,optional,external tests the following optional and external doctests: Using --optional=bliss,cbc,ccache,cmake,dot2tex,external,gmpy2,lrslib,memlimit,mpir,normaliz,notedown,pandoc_attributes,pycosat,pynormaliz,python2,rst2ipynb,sage