[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[Simon King]

Hi Dima,

which one? meataxe or p_group_cohomology? How would either of them
influence the gap packages? And is there a ticket for it?

Best regards,
Simon

On 2019-11-27, Dima Pasechnik  wrote:
> IIRC this comes from Simon King's optional package.
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, 16:11 John Cremona,  wrote:
>
>> I had this failure (I have gap_packages installed):
>>
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 59.7 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py
>> **
>> File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in sage.tests.gap_packages
>> Failed example:
>> test_packages(pkgs, only_failures=True)# optional - gap_packages
>> Expected:
>>   Status   Package   GAP Output
>> ++-++
>> Got:
>> #I  method installed for Matrix matches more than one declaration
>>   Status   Package   GAP Output
>> ++-++
>> **
>> 1 item had failures:
>>1 of   5 in sage.tests.gap_packages
>> [11 tests, 1 failure, 4.74 s]
>> --
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 59.7 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py  # 1
>> doctest failed

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/qrntfn%2444ou%241%40blaine.gmane.org.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

Thank you, Dima !

Upgrading my rebuilt 9.0beta6 to 9.0beta7 on my core i7/16 GB machine gives 
me 14 transient failures and the three permanent failures already knows 
(two GLPK-related and explained by Dima, one related to gap_packages, 
already known and explained). For completeness' sake:

| File  | Result | P/T |
|---++-|
| src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py | 6 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py | 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/misc/package.py  | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/symbolic/integration/external.py | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/plot/animate.py  | 7 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py| 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/coding/databases.py  | 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/misc/persist.pyx | 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx  | 1 doctest failed   | P   |
| src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py| 1 doctest failed   | P   |
| src/sage/repl/load.py | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/misc/latex.py| 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx  | 1 doctest failed   | P   |
| src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py| 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/combinat/designs/ext_rep.py  | 1 doctest failed   | T   |
| src/sage/misc/remote_file.py  | 2 doctests failed  | T   |
| src/sage/databases/findstat.py| 59 doctests failed | T   |

Details seemingly identical to what I reported before (available on demand).

HTH,

Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:43:15 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> there  is also a small GLPK 4.65 discrepancy coming from a patch that 
> Sage applies, 
> but most distros don't. 
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:39 PM Dima Pasechnik  > wrote: 
> > 
> > Since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28459 
> > Sage can use GLPK from the system, if it's version 4.63 or newer. Sage 
> has 4.65. 
> > The slight discrepancy in GLPK tests is due to this version 
> > difference, and it's harmless. 
> > (I set it to 4.63 to cover many more Linux distros) 
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier 
> > > wrote: 
> > > 
> > > THIS WAS A MISTAKE: those resuts are for 9.0.beta6, not beta7. 
> Rebuilding beta7 and tests underway... 
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the noise... 
> > > 
> > > Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:07:14 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a 
> écrit : 
> > >> 
> > >> I tried to recompile from scratch (i. e. make distclean ; make ; 
> resinsttalling the same optional packages (+ python2) and R packages, then 
> make ptestalllong). This time, I got five transient failures and three 
> permanent failures, none of them due to a crash : 
> > >> 
> > >> | File | Result| 
> P/T | 
> > >> 
> |--+---+-| 
> > >> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py   | 1 doctest failed  | 
> T   | 
> > >> | src/sage/plot/animate.py | 7 doctests failed | 
> T   | 
> > >> | src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py  | 2 doctests failed | 
> T   | 
> > >> | src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx | 1 doctest failed  | 
> P   | 
> > >> | src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py   | 1 doctest failed  | 
> P   | 
> > >> | src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx | 1 doctest failed  | 
> P   | 
> > >> | src/sage/misc/latex.py   | 1 doctest failed  | 
> T   | 
> > >> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py   | 2 doctests failed | 
> T   | 
> > >> 
> > >> The temporary failures have been reported already (except possibly 
> for ssmod). Details of the permanent failures : 
> > >> 
> > >> glpk_backend.py: 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-09-4e9dc047. 
> > >> Git branch: develop 
> > >> Using 
> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
>  
>
> > >> Doctesting 1 file. 
> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 
> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx 
> > >> 
> ** 
> > >> File "src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx", line 2287, in 
> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges 
> > >> Failed example: 
> > >> p.print_ranges() 
> > >> Expected: 
> > >> glp_print_ranges: optimal basic solution required 
> > >> 1 
> > >> Got: 
> > >> 1 
> > >> 
> ** 
> > >> 1 item had failures: 
> > >>1 of  13 in 
> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges 
> > 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

there  is also a small GLPK 4.65 discrepancy coming from a patch that
Sage applies,
but most distros don't.


On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:39 PM Dima Pasechnik  wrote:
>
> Since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28459
> Sage can use GLPK from the system, if it's version 4.63 or newer. Sage has 
> 4.65.
> The slight discrepancy in GLPK tests is due to this version
> difference, and it's harmless.
> (I set it to 4.63 to cover many more Linux distros)
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
>  wrote:
> >
> > THIS WAS A MISTAKE: those resuts are for 9.0.beta6, not beta7. Rebuilding 
> > beta7 and tests underway...
> >
> > Sorry for the noise...
> >
> > Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:07:14 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
> >>
> >> I tried to recompile from scratch (i. e. make distclean ; make ; 
> >> resinsttalling the same optional packages (+ python2) and R packages, then 
> >> make ptestalllong). This time, I got five transient failures and three 
> >> permanent failures, none of them due to a crash :
> >>
> >> | File | Result| P/T |
> >> |--+---+-|
> >> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py   | 1 doctest failed  | T   |
> >> | src/sage/plot/animate.py | 7 doctests failed | T   |
> >> | src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py  | 2 doctests failed | T   |
> >> | src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx | 1 doctest failed  | P   |
> >> | src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py   | 1 doctest failed  | P   |
> >> | src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx | 1 doctest failed  | P   |
> >> | src/sage/misc/latex.py   | 1 doctest failed  | T   |
> >> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py   | 2 doctests failed | T   |
> >>
> >> The temporary failures have been reported already (except possibly for 
> >> ssmod). Details of the permanent failures :
> >>
> >> glpk_backend.py:
> >>
> >>
> >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-09-4e9dc047.
> >> Git branch: develop
> >> Using 
> >> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
> >> Doctesting 1 file.
> >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 
> >> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx
> >> **
> >> File "src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx", line 2287, in 
> >> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
> >> Failed example:
> >> p.print_ranges()
> >> Expected:
> >> glp_print_ranges: optimal basic solution required
> >> 1
> >> Got:
> >> 1
> >> **
> >> 1 item had failures:
> >>1 of  13 in 
> >> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
> >> [554 tests, 1 failure, 3.88 s]
> >> --
> >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 
> >> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
> >> --
> >> Total time for all tests: 4.0 seconds
> >> cpu time: 3.9 seconds
> >> cumulative wall time: 3.9 seconds
> >>
> >> gap_packages:
> >>
> >>
> >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-16-07798fcc.
> >> Git branch: develop
> >> Using 
> >> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
> >> Doctesting 1 file.
> >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py
> >> **
> >> File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in sage.tests.gap_packages
> >> Failed example:
> >> test_packages(pkgs, only_failures=True)# optional - gap_packages
> >> Expected:
> >>   Status   Package   GAP Output
> >> ++-++
> >> Got:
> >> #I  method installed for Matrix matches more than one declaration
> >>   Status   Package   GAP Output
> >> ++-++
> >> **
> >> 1 item had failures:
> >>1 of   5 in sage.tests.gap_packages
> >> [11 tests, 1 failure, 3.82 s]
> >> --
> >> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py  # 1 
> >> doctest failed
> >> --
> >> Total time for all tests: 3.9 seconds
> >> cpu time: 3.2 seconds
> >> cumulative wall time: 3.8 seconds
> >>
> >> error.pyx:
> >>
> >>
> >> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-23-f1e208db.
> >> Git branch: develop
> >> Using 
> >> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
> >> Doctesting 1 file.
> >> sage -t 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

Since https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28459
Sage can use GLPK from the system, if it's version 4.63 or newer. Sage has 4.65.
The slight discrepancy in GLPK tests is due to this version
difference, and it's harmless.
(I set it to 4.63 to cover many more Linux distros)

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
 wrote:
>
> THIS WAS A MISTAKE: those resuts are for 9.0.beta6, not beta7. Rebuilding 
> beta7 and tests underway...
>
> Sorry for the noise...
>
> Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:07:14 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>>
>> I tried to recompile from scratch (i. e. make distclean ; make ; 
>> resinsttalling the same optional packages (+ python2) and R packages, then 
>> make ptestalllong). This time, I got five transient failures and three 
>> permanent failures, none of them due to a crash :
>>
>> | File | Result| P/T |
>> |--+---+-|
>> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py   | 1 doctest failed  | T   |
>> | src/sage/plot/animate.py | 7 doctests failed | T   |
>> | src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py  | 2 doctests failed | T   |
>> | src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx | 1 doctest failed  | P   |
>> | src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py   | 1 doctest failed  | P   |
>> | src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx | 1 doctest failed  | P   |
>> | src/sage/misc/latex.py   | 1 doctest failed  | T   |
>> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py   | 2 doctests failed | T   |
>>
>> The temporary failures have been reported already (except possibly for 
>> ssmod). Details of the permanent failures :
>>
>> glpk_backend.py:
>>
>>
>> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-09-4e9dc047.
>> Git branch: develop
>> Using 
>> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
>> Doctesting 1 file.
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx
>> **
>> File "src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx", line 2287, in 
>> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
>> Failed example:
>> p.print_ranges()
>> Expected:
>> glp_print_ranges: optimal basic solution required
>> 1
>> Got:
>> 1
>> **
>> 1 item had failures:
>>1 of  13 in sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
>> [554 tests, 1 failure, 3.88 s]
>> --
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 
>> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
>> --
>> Total time for all tests: 4.0 seconds
>> cpu time: 3.9 seconds
>> cumulative wall time: 3.9 seconds
>>
>> gap_packages:
>>
>>
>> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-16-07798fcc.
>> Git branch: develop
>> Using 
>> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
>> Doctesting 1 file.
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py
>> **
>> File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in sage.tests.gap_packages
>> Failed example:
>> test_packages(pkgs, only_failures=True)# optional - gap_packages
>> Expected:
>>   Status   Package   GAP Output
>> ++-++
>> Got:
>> #I  method installed for Matrix matches more than one declaration
>>   Status   Package   GAP Output
>> ++-++
>> **
>> 1 item had failures:
>>1 of   5 in sage.tests.gap_packages
>> [11 tests, 1 failure, 3.82 s]
>> --
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py  # 1 doctest 
>> failed
>> --
>> Total time for all tests: 3.9 seconds
>> cpu time: 3.2 seconds
>> cumulative wall time: 3.8 seconds
>>
>> error.pyx:
>>
>>
>> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-23-f1e208db.
>> Git branch: develop
>> Using 
>> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
>> Doctesting 1 file.
>> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx
>> **
>> File "src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx", line 100, in 
>> sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler
>> Failed example:
>> res = p.solve()
>> Expected:
>>   0: obj = ...
>> Got:
>> 
>> 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

*THIS WAS A MISTAKE: *those resuts are for *9.0.beta6*, not *beta7*. 
Rebuilding beta7 and tests underway...

Sorry for the noise...

Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 22:07:14 UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
>
> I tried to recompile from scratch (i. e. make distclean ; make ; 
> resinsttalling the same optional packages (+ python2) and R packages, 
> then make ptestalllong). This time, I got five transient failures and 
> three permanent failures, none of them due to a crash :
>
> | File | Result| P/T |
> |--+---+-|
> | src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py   | 1 doctest failed  | T   |
> | src/sage/plot/animate.py | 7 doctests failed | T   |
> | src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py  | 2 doctests failed | T   |
> | src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx | 1 doctest failed  | P   |
> | src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py   | 1 doctest failed  | P   |
> | src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx | 1 doctest failed  | P   |
> | src/sage/misc/latex.py   | 1 doctest failed  | T   |
> | src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py   | 2 doctests failed | T   |
>
> The temporary failures have been reported already (except possibly for 
> ssmod). Details of the permanent failures :
>
>
>- glpk_backend.py:
>
>
> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-09-4e9dc047.
> Git branch: develop
> Using 
> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
> Doctesting 1 file.
> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 
> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx
> **
> File "src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx", line 2287, in 
> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
> Failed example:
> p.print_ranges()
> Expected:
> glp_print_ranges: optimal basic solution required
> 1
> Got:
> 1
> **
> 1 item had failures:
>1 of  13 in 
> sage.numerical.backends.glpk_backend.GLPKBackend.print_ranges
> [554 tests, 1 failure, 3.88 s]
> --
> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 
> src/sage/numerical/backends/glpk_backend.pyx  # 1 doctest failed
> --
> Total time for all tests: 4.0 seconds
> cpu time: 3.9 seconds
> cumulative wall time: 3.9 seconds
>
>
>- gap_packages:
>
>
> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-16-07798fcc.
> Git branch: develop
> Using 
> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
> Doctesting 1 file.
> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py
> **
> File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in sage.tests.gap_packages
> Failed example:
> test_packages(pkgs, only_failures=True)# optional - gap_packages
> Expected:
>   Status   Package   GAP Output
> ++-++
> Got:
> #I  method installed for Matrix matches more than one declaration
>   Status   Package   GAP Output
> ++-++
> **
> 1 item had failures:
>1 of   5 in sage.tests.gap_packages
> [11 tests, 1 failure, 3.82 s]
> --
> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py  # 1 
> doctest failed
> --
> Total time for all tests: 3.9 seconds
> cpu time: 3.2 seconds
> cumulative wall time: 3.8 seconds
>
>
>- error.pyx:
>
>
> Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-21-45-23-f1e208db.
> Git branch: develop
> Using 
> --optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
> Doctesting 1 file.
> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx
> **
> File "src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx", line 100, in 
> sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler
> Failed example:
> res = p.solve()
> Expected:
>   0: obj = ...
> Got:
> 
> **
> 1 item had failures:
>1 of  11 in sage.libs.glpk.error.setup_glpk_error_handler
> [12 tests, 1 failure, 0.90 s]
> --
> sage -t --long --warn-long 162.8 src/sage/libs/glpk/error.pyx  # 1 doctest 
> failed
> --
> Total time for all tests: 0.9 seconds
> cpu 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[Dima Pasechnik]

IIRC this comes from Simon King's optional package.

On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, 16:11 John Cremona,  wrote:

> I had this failure (I have gap_packages installed):
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 59.7 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py
> **
> File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in sage.tests.gap_packages
> Failed example:
> test_packages(pkgs, only_failures=True)# optional - gap_packages
> Expected:
>   Status   Package   GAP Output
> ++-++
> Got:
> #I  method installed for Matrix matches more than one declaration
>   Status   Package   GAP Output
> ++-++
> **
> 1 item had failures:
>1 of   5 in sage.tests.gap_packages
> [11 tests, 1 failure, 4.74 s]
> --
> sage -t --long --warn-long 59.7 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py  # 1
> doctest failed
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 15:08, Sébastien Labbé  wrote:
>
>> Using
>> --optional=4ti2,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,dot2tex,e_antic,external,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,normaliz,notedown,openssl,pandoc_attributes,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sagenb
>>
>> --
>> sage -t --long src/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/linear_programming.rst  # 1
>> doctest failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/coding/databases.py  # 2 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py  # 2
>> doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py  # 1 doctest failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/databases/findstat.py  # 16 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.py  # Killed due to abort
>> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/generators/families.py  # 7 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py  # 2 doctests
>> failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py  # 2 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/latex.py  # 1 doctest failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/persist.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/remote_file.py  # 2 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/gurobi_backend.pyx  # 17
>> doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/plot/animate.py  # 7 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/repl/load.py  # 1 doctest failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py  # 7 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/cmdline.py  # 2 doctests failed
>> --
>> External software detected for doctesting:
>> cplex,ffmpeg,graphviz,gurobi,imagemagick,internet,latex,pandoc
>>
>> Rerunning the failed test I get the same (except
>> graphs/generators/families.py which disappeared):
>>
>> --
>> sage -t --long src/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/linear_programming.rst  # 1
>> doctest failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/coding/databases.py  # 2 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py  # 2
>> doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py  # 1 doctest failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/databases/findstat.py  # 18 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.py  # Killed due to abort
>> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py  # 2 doctests
>> failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py  # 2 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/latex.py  # 1 doctest failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/persist.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/remote_file.py  # 2 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/gurobi_backend.pyx  # 17
>> doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/plot/animate.py  # 7 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/repl/load.py  # 1 doctest failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py  # 7 doctests failed
>> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/cmdline.py  # 2 doctests failed
>> --
>> External software detected for doctesting:
>> ffmpeg,graphviz,gurobi,imagemagick,internet,latex,pandoc
>>
>> Many of the failures are already fixed (postive review tickets). Few
>> other failures are waiting for work. Follow up at
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25536
>>
>> Every other tests passed!
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "sage-release" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/73238bc6-81f8-445c-91e6-cb36a8ae1ec4%40googlegroups.com
>> 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[John H Palmieri]

It's okay with Python 3, but I'm getting a failure on OS X when built with 
Python 2:


sage -t --long --warn-long 68.2 src/sage/libs/pynac/pynac.pyx
**
File "src/sage/libs/pynac/pynac.pyx", line 295, in 
sage.libs.pynac.pynac.subs_args_to_PyTuple
Failed example:
tfunc(x).subs(x=1)   # py2
Expected:
len(args): 3, types: [,
  ,
  ]
x
Got:
len(args): 3, types: [, , ]
x
**
1 item had failures:
   1 of   5 in sage.libs.pynac.pynac.subs_args_to_PyTuple
[332 tests, 1 failure, 4.15 s]
--
sage -t --long --warn-long 68.2 src/sage/libs/pynac/pynac.pyx  # 1 doctest 
failed
--


On Tuesday, November 26, 2019 at 4:28:33 PM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>
>
> d48a21c149 (tag: 9.0.beta7, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
> 9.0.beta7
> 22426a509b Trac #28797: 32-bit Python 3 failures in combinat
> 54072f6c3b Trac #28795: Python 3 overflow in IntegerModRing pow
> 7f2572fcdf Trac #28685: Upgrade from beautifulsoup to beautifulsoup4
> c597ceea70 Trac #28737: remove deprecated stuff in old coercion model
> a5c1185e7c Trac #28736: fix Texture for negative inputs
> 6c66325a63 Trac #28698: py3: HTML documentation for GlobalOptions does not 
> show up correctly
> aa0ac42b16 Trac #28675: Deprecate GraphicsArray import from 
> sage.plot.graphics
> 5882b7f376 Trac #28564: Tensor Fields and Sections: Naming Consistencies
> 8f9b67d25c Trac #28304: add type information to _repr_ of Macaulay2 
> elements
> e6e616380a Trac #28214: Compute and display graph of nth-preimage tree
> a5bb40f91c Trac #27838: 5 internet doctests failing in findstat.py
> 6553536757 Trac #27790: compatibility with cplex 12.9
> 3c6a9108c1 Trac #23816: implement left action of matrices on scheme points
> 9c6f3dab7f Trac #28732: update sagetex to version 3.4
> f856552b81 Trac #28748: Python 3 debug build fails to start
> 232ae1bddc (tag: 9.0.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.beta6
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/b06dac5e-11c1-4e5b-95d2-f0d51595a7a2%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[John Cremona]

I had this failure (I have gap_packages installed):

sage -t --long --warn-long 59.7 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py
**
File "src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py", line 8, in sage.tests.gap_packages
Failed example:
test_packages(pkgs, only_failures=True)# optional - gap_packages
Expected:
  Status   Package   GAP Output
++-++
Got:
#I  method installed for Matrix matches more than one declaration
  Status   Package   GAP Output
++-++
**
1 item had failures:
   1 of   5 in sage.tests.gap_packages
[11 tests, 1 failure, 4.74 s]
--
sage -t --long --warn-long 59.7 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py  # 1 doctest
failed




On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 15:08, Sébastien Labbé  wrote:

> Using
> --optional=4ti2,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,dot2tex,e_antic,external,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,normaliz,notedown,openssl,pandoc_attributes,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sagenb
>
> --
> sage -t --long src/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/linear_programming.rst  # 1
> doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/coding/databases.py  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py  # 2 doctests
> failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/databases/findstat.py  # 16 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.py  # Killed due to abort
> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/generators/families.py  # 7 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py  # 2 doctests
> failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/latex.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/persist.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/remote_file.py  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/gurobi_backend.pyx  # 17
> doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/plot/animate.py  # 7 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/repl/load.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py  # 7 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/cmdline.py  # 2 doctests failed
> --
> External software detected for doctesting:
> cplex,ffmpeg,graphviz,gurobi,imagemagick,internet,latex,pandoc
>
> Rerunning the failed test I get the same (except
> graphs/generators/families.py which disappeared):
>
> --
> sage -t --long src/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/linear_programming.rst  # 1
> doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/coding/databases.py  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py  # 2 doctests
> failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/databases/findstat.py  # 18 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.py  # Killed due to abort
> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py  # 2 doctests
> failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/latex.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/persist.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/misc/remote_file.py  # 2 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/gurobi_backend.pyx  # 17
> doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/plot/animate.py  # 7 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/repl/load.py  # 1 doctest failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py  # 7 doctests failed
> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/cmdline.py  # 2 doctests failed
> --
> External software detected for doctesting:
> ffmpeg,graphviz,gurobi,imagemagick,internet,latex,pandoc
>
> Many of the failures are already fixed (postive review tickets). Few other
> failures are waiting for work. Follow up at
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25536
>
> Every other tests passed!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/73238bc6-81f8-445c-91e6-cb36a8ae1ec4%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from 

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[Sébastien Labbé]

Using 
--optional=4ti2,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,dot2tex,e_antic,external,glucose,latte_int,lidia,lrslib,memlimit,normaliz,notedown,openssl,pandoc_attributes,pycosat,pynormaliz,rst2ipynb,sage,sagenb

--
sage -t --long src/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/linear_programming.rst  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long src/sage/coding/databases.py  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py  # 2 doctests 
failed
sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long src/sage/databases/findstat.py  # 16 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.py  # Killed due to abort
sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/generators/families.py  # 7 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py  # 2 doctests 
failed
sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/misc/latex.py  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long src/sage/misc/persist.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/misc/remote_file.py  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/gurobi_backend.pyx  # 17 
doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/plot/animate.py  # 7 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/repl/load.py  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py  # 7 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/tests/cmdline.py  # 2 doctests failed
--
External software detected for doctesting: 
cplex,ffmpeg,graphviz,gurobi,imagemagick,internet,latex,pandoc

Rerunning the failed test I get the same (except 
graphs/generators/families.py which disappeared):

--
sage -t --long src/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/linear_programming.rst  # 1 
doctest failed
sage -t --long src/sage/coding/databases.py  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py  # 2 doctests 
failed
sage -t --long src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long src/sage/databases/findstat.py  # 18 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.py  # Killed due to abort
sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/generators/smallgraphs.py  # 2 doctests 
failed
sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/misc/latex.py  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long src/sage/misc/persist.pyx  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/misc/remote_file.py  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/gurobi_backend.pyx  # 17 
doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/plot/animate.py  # 7 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/repl/load.py  # 1 doctest failed
sage -t --long src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py  # 7 doctests failed
sage -t --long src/sage/tests/cmdline.py  # 2 doctests failed
--
External software detected for doctesting: 
ffmpeg,graphviz,gurobi,imagemagick,internet,latex,pandoc

Many of the failures are already fixed (postive review tickets). Few other 
failures are waiting for work. Follow up at 
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25536

Every other tests passed!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/73238bc6-81f8-445c-91e6-cb36a8ae1ec4%40googlegroups.com.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta7 released

[Emmanuel Charpentier]

Doubleplusungood...

On Deboan testing running on core i5 + 8 GB RAM, ptestalllong gets me (part 
of) the usual suspects (transient failures, plus 6 (six) permanent failures 
due to abort:

| File | Result
  | P/T |
|--+-+-|
| src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py | Killed due to 
abort | P   |
| src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_sequence.py   | Killed due to 
abort | P   |
| src/sage/combinat/posets/posets.py   | 1 doctest 
failed| T   |
| src/sage/plot/animate.py | 7 doctests 
failed   | T   |
| src/sage/combinat/matrices/hadamard_matrix.py| 2 doctests 
failed   | T   |
| src/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx  | Killed due to 
abort | P   |
| src/sage/misc/latex.py   | 1 doctest 
failed| T   |
| src/sage/coding/databases.py | 2 doctests 
failed   | T   |
| src/sage/misc/persist.pyx| 2 doctests 
failed   | T   |
| src/sage/repl/load.py| 1 doctest 
failed| T   |
| src/sage/graphs/graph_latex.py   | 2 doctests 
failed   | T   |
| src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_ring_constructor.py | Killed due to 
abort | P   |
| src/sage/sat/solvers/dimacs.py   | Killed due to 
abort | P   |
| src/doc/en/reference/sat/index.rst   | Killed due to 
abort | P   |
| src/sage/sat/boolean_polynomials.py  | Killed due to 
abort | P   |
| src/sage/misc/remote_file.py | 2 doctests 
failed   | T   |
| src/sage/databases/findstat.py   | 7 doctests 
failed   | T   |
| src/sage/interfaces/magma_free.py| 2 doctests 
failed   | T   |

Details : see the enclose checkerrs.txt

HTH,

Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019 01:28:33 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git 
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at 
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 
>
>
> d48a21c149 (tag: 9.0.beta7, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to 
> 9.0.beta7
> 22426a509b Trac #28797: 32-bit Python 3 failures in combinat
> 54072f6c3b Trac #28795: Python 3 overflow in IntegerModRing pow
> 7f2572fcdf Trac #28685: Upgrade from beautifulsoup to beautifulsoup4
> c597ceea70 Trac #28737: remove deprecated stuff in old coercion model
> a5c1185e7c Trac #28736: fix Texture for negative inputs
> 6c66325a63 Trac #28698: py3: HTML documentation for GlobalOptions does not 
> show up correctly
> aa0ac42b16 Trac #28675: Deprecate GraphicsArray import from 
> sage.plot.graphics
> 5882b7f376 Trac #28564: Tensor Fields and Sections: Naming Consistencies
> 8f9b67d25c Trac #28304: add type information to _repr_ of Macaulay2 
> elements
> e6e616380a Trac #28214: Compute and display graph of nth-preimage tree
> a5bb40f91c Trac #27838: 5 internet doctests failing in findstat.py
> 6553536757 Trac #27790: compatibility with cplex 12.9
> 3c6a9108c1 Trac #23816: implement left action of matrices on scheme points
> 9c6f3dab7f Trac #28732: update sagetex to version 3.4
> f856552b81 Trac #28748: Python 3 debug build fails to start
> 232ae1bddc (tag: 9.0.beta6) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.beta6
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/1b4bd471-1892-4f18-af38-45aa5ffae3d9%40googlegroups.com.
Running doctests with ID 2019-11-27-14-40-41-2abf3ce3.
Git branch: develop
Using 
--optional=build,dochtml,dot2tex,fricas,giacpy_sage,libsemigroups,memlimit,python2,sage,sagenb
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long --warn-long 53.8 src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py
Killed due to abort
**
Tests run before process (pid=58067) failed:
sage: sr = mq.SR(1, 1, 1, 4) ## line 29 ##
sage: sr.n, sr.r, sr.c, sr.e ## line 37 ##
(1, 1, 1, 4)
sage: print(sr.R.repr_long()) ## line 42 ##
Polynomial Ring
  Base Ring : Finite Field in a of size 2^4
   Size : 20 Variables
   Block  0 : Ordering : deglex
  Names: k100, k101, k102, k103, x100, x101, x102, x103, w100, 
w101, w102, w103, s000, s001, s002, s003, k000, k001, k002, k003

sage: sr.ShiftRows ## line 53 ##
[1 0 0 0]
[0 1 0 0]
[0 0 1 0]
[0 0 0 1]
sage: sr.MixColumns ## line 61 ##
[1 0 0 0]
[0 1 0 0]
[0 0 1 0]
[0 0 0 1]
sage: sr.Lin ## line 69 ##
[  a^2 + 1 1 a^3 + a^2   a^2 + 1]
[a a 1