Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, 01:40 Matthias Köppe, wrote: > Which package, Dima? > sorry, wrong thread > > On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 4:45:29 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> This package produces incorrect maths results, it has to be demoted to >> experimental, IMHO. >> >> >> On 15 November

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread Matthias Köppe
Which package, Dima? On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 4:45:29 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > This package produces incorrect maths results, it has to be demoted to > experimental, IMHO. > > > On 15 November 2023 22:37:30 GMT, "Matthias Köppe" > wrote: > >> On Tuesday, November 14, 2023 at

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread Dima Pasechnik
This package produces incorrect maths results, it has to be demoted to experimental, IMHO. On 15 November 2023 22:37:30 GMT, "Matthias Köppe" wrote: >On Tuesday, November 14, 2023 at 3:13:46 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: > >fa5c9395d3e (tag: 10.2.rc3, github/develop) Updated SageMath version

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Tuesday, November 14, 2023 at 3:13:46 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote: fa5c9395d3e (tag: 10.2.rc3, github/develop) Updated SageMath version to 10.2.rc3 Thanks, Volker, for the latest rc. I think we're in pretty good shape now, but I think we need one more round for the following: -

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread John Cremona
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023, 17:43 Dima Pasechnik, wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:12 PM John Cremona > wrote: > > > > I am seeing failures building from rc3 (commit fa5c9395d3). To make > sure I made a fresh git clone of this and did nothing more than > > > > ./bootstrap > > ./configure > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:12 PM John Cremona wrote: > > I am seeing failures building from rc3 (commit fa5c9395d3). To make sure I made a fresh git clone of this and did nothing more than > > ./bootstrap > ./configure > make -j16 > > On thre machines, make build worked OK, but not make: it is

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread John Cremona
I am seeing failures building from rc3 (commit fa5c9395d3). To make sure I made a fresh git clone of this and did nothing more than ./bootstrap ./configure make -j16 On thre machines, make build worked OK, but not make: it is sagemath_doc_html-none which fails. The short logfile is attached.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread Matthias Köppe
You may have to force-pull the release tags: git fetch --tags -f upstream On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 1:51:07 AM UTC-8 John Cremona wrote: Is it expected that doing "git pull upstream develop" on top of the rc1 commit should be a merge? On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 23:13, Volker Braun

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 10.2.rc2, with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.2.rc3 released

2023-11-15 Thread John Cremona
Is it expected that doing "git pull upstream develop" on top of the rc1 commit should be a merge? On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 23:13, Volker Braun wrote: > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >