This looks like it is picking up some environment variable. Can you post
the output of "env"?
On Thursday, August 7, 2014 8:46:33 AM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Volker Braun > wrote:
> > In any case, can you post logs/pkgs/r-3.1.1.p0.log
>
>
> Tried again
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> In any case, can you post logs/pkgs/r-3.1.1.p0.log
Tried again after pulling the new dev update, but no surprises:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/schilly/logs/r-3.1.1.p0.log
harald
--
You received this message because you are subscr
Yes, I will. I'm just currently travelling ☺
H
On Aug 6, 2014 1:35 PM, "Volker Braun" wrote:
> In any case, can you post logs/pkgs/r-3.1.1.p0.log
>
> On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 8:37:09 AM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>>> Also, w
In any case, can you post logs/pkgs/r-3.1.1.p0.log
On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 8:37:09 AM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Volker Braun > wrote:
>
>> Also, where is the /home/harri/.local coming from? Is that from some
>> environment variable that you have set
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Also, where is the /home/harri/.local coming from? Is that from some
> environment variable that you have set?
Well, no idea, I've certainly adjusted some knobs on my ubuntu box … with
maybe not so fortunate effects. If it is just me havi
Also, where is the /home/harri/.local coming from? Is that from some
environment variable that you have set?
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014 9:33:20 PM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> gcc -I/home/harri/.local/include -L/home/harri/.local/lib
> -I/home/opt/sage/sage-git/local/var/tmp/sage/build/r-3.1
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014 9:33:20 PM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> that grep gave
> gcc -I/home/harri/.local/include -L/home/harri/.local/lib
> -I/home/opt/sage/sage-git/local/var/tmp/sage/build/r-3.1.1.p0/src/include
> -DNDEBUG -DNTIMER -I./SuiteSparse_config -fpic -g -O2 -c CHMfacto
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On my machine the -std=gnu99 is present:
>
> $ grep CHMfactor.c logs/pkgs/r-3.1.1.p0.log
>
that grep gave
gcc -I/home/harri/.local/include -L/home/harri/.local/lib
-I/home/opt/sage/sage-git/local/var/tmp/sage/build/r-3.1.1.p0/src/include
-
leif wrote:
Volker Braun wrote:
The configure output is probably the interesting part, Harald.
FWIW, I'm having
checking for gcc-4.9.1 option to accept ISO C99... -std=gnu99
checking for gcc-4.9.1 -std=gnu99 option to accept ISO Standard C...
(cached) -std=gnu99
in the R build log.
But does
Volker Braun wrote:
The configure output is probably the interesting part, Harald.
FWIW, I'm having
checking for gcc-4.9.1 option to accept ISO C99... -std=gnu99
checking for gcc-4.9.1 -std=gnu99 option to accept ISO Standard C...
(cached) -std=gnu99
in the R build log.
But doesn't any rec
The configure output is probably the interesting part, Harald.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
On my machine the -std=gnu99 is present:
$ grep CHMfactor.c logs/pkgs/r-3.1.1.p0.log
gcc -std=gnu99
-I/home/release/Sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/r-3.1.1.p0/src/include
-DNDEBUG -DNTIMER -I./SuiteSparse_config -fpic -g -O2 -c CHMfactor.c
-o CHMfactor.o
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014 4:35:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Interesting, which gcc version?
>
well, mabye it is picking up the wrong file? (I'll delete my CCACHE and
try again) ... i don't know.
version numbers:
(sage-sh)$ which gcc
/home/opt/sage/sage-git/local/libexec/ccache/gcc
(sage-sh)$ gcc -
Interesting, which gcc version?
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014 4:19:02 PM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 4, 2014 7:39:40 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> Here is the first release candidate. Please give it a test and report any
>> build problems.
>>
>
> It failed for me in
On Monday, August 4, 2014 7:39:40 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Here is the first release candidate. Please give it a test and report any
> build problems.
>
It failed for me in r-3.1.1.p0/Matrix
* DONE (lattice)
begin installing recommended package Matrix
* installing *source* package 'Ma
Fixed. Sorry, jet lag ;-)
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014 8:58:56 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On 2014-08-04, Volker Braun > wrote:
> > --=_Part_1781_1329544834.1407173980834
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >
> > Here is the first release candidate. Please give it a test an
On 2014-08-05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2014-08-05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> On 2014-08-04, Volker Braun wrote:
>>> --=_Part_1781_1329544834.1407173980834
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>>
>>> Here is the first release candidate. Please give it a test and report any
>>> buil
On 2014-08-05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2014-08-04, Volker Braun wrote:
>> --=_Part_1781_1329544834.1407173980834
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> Here is the first release candidate. Please give it a test and report any
>> build problems. As usual, get the newest git "deve
On 2014-08-04, Volker Braun wrote:
> --=_Part_1781_1329544834.1407173980834
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Here is the first release candidate. Please give it a test and report any
> build problems. As usual, get the newest git "develop" branch or
hmm, I can't get it:
seems t
19 matches
Mail list logo
