Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Nathann Cohen
> Sure, that cannot hurt. Well, it's now #15787. http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15787 Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+un

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 12:32:56 PM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > > Those are the multi-threaded (pthread) versions. It is preferable if you > > have them, though we can of course just work with the single-threaded > > version. > > Oh. I see. Do I patch the manual then ? > Sure, that

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Nathann Cohen
> Those are the multi-threaded (pthread) versions. It is preferable if you > have them, though we can of course just work with the single-threaded > version. Oh. I see. Do I patch the manual then ? Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-relea

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Volker Braun
Those are the multi-threaded (pthread) versions. It is preferable if you have them, though we can of course just work with the single-threaded version. On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 11:15:16 AM UTC, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > > "make" doesn't know about changed environment variables, so you eith

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Nathann Cohen
> "make" doesn't know about changed environment variables, so you either > recompile from scratch or keep using your current install. Okayokay. Then what do we do with the manual ? Do you also think that we can remove "libptf77blas" and "libptcblas" from the list of files needed by atlas ? Nathan

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Volker Braun
"make" doesn't know about changed environment variables, so you either recompile from scratch or keep using your current install. On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 10:59:55 AM UTC, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > > If SAGE_ATLAS_LIB is set then we don't compile atlas. If the system > atlas > > libraries

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Nathann Cohen
> If SAGE_ATLAS_LIB is set then we don't compile atlas. If the system atlas > libraries don't work then you'll get an error later on, of course. Okay... Would "make" be enough to have Sage notice that a different Atlas is to be used and that everything now has to be recompiled with the new one

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Volker Braun
If SAGE_ATLAS_LIB is set then we don't compile atlas. If the system atlas libraries don't work then you'll get an error later on, of course. On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 10:52:11 AM UTC, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > > I'd say [1] is wrong and the *pt* files are optional. > > For sure the debian l

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Nathann Cohen
> I'd say [1] is wrong and the *pt* files are optional. > For sure the debian libatlas-base-dev (approximate name) is enough. Oh. Is there a way for me to test that Sage uses debian's files without any problem and does not build its own atlas again ? Ideally without rebuilding all of Sage :-P If

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 11:46:23 AM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > > Atlas compile time mostly depends on whether atlas has pre-computed > defaults > > for your cpu, not so much on the CPU speed. If it bothers you, use the > > SAGE_ATLAS_LIB environment variable to use a system/previou

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-05 Thread Nathann Cohen
> Atlas compile time mostly depends on whether atlas has pre-computed defaults > for your cpu, not so much on the CPU speed. If it bothers you, use the > SAGE_ATLAS_LIB environment variable to use a system/previously-compiled > library HMmm Looks like debian's packages do not contain the "libp

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-04 Thread Volker Braun
Atlas compile time mostly depends on whether atlas has pre-computed defaults for your cpu, not so much on the CPU speed. If it bothers you, use the SAGE_ATLAS_LIB environment variable to use a system/previously-compiled library On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 8:05:36 PM UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-04 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
I tried installing "the classic way", i. e. from the tarball (as mirrored at Paris-VI university). On a "big laptom" (Core i7, 16 GB RAM) under Debian testing, a parallel compilation (export MAKE="make -j8 -l10" ; time make ssl) t took almost 4 hours : real215m37.165s user369m27.220s sy

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-03 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-02-03 12:57, Volker Braun wrote: --author='Release Manager' OK, I will add this option. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+un

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-03 Thread kcrisman
So... is the release script not being used any more to at least add to the release log? "So and so many new contributors" etc? This would be really really unfortunate, and I think Jeroen even put his script in a public place it could easily be used by someone knowledgeable about release manag

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-03 Thread Volker Braun
On Monday, February 3, 2014 12:04:58 PM UTC, John Cremona wrote: > > I deleted all of src/doc/output and re-made, and the problem went away. > You can also "make doc-clean" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from t

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-03 Thread John Cremona
On 3 February 2014 09:42, John Cremona wrote: > After pulling the latest develop commits from trac and doing make, I > get errors building the docs, starting at > > > [combinat ] /home/jec/sage/src/doc/en/reference/combinat/algebra.rst:4: > WARNING: toctree contains reference to nonexisting docume

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-03 Thread Volker Braun
In b554827a94872c3e62cd7311c22e28d38e635ffc Travis started a new branch on top of a rebased tree, or the master tree was yanked from under his feet. In any case, it shouldn't happen again but there is no point in beating yourself up over mistakes that were made. On Monday, February 3, 2014 9:51

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-03 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-02-02 23:18, Harald Schilly wrote: Are there already somewhere the release notes? And if not, does anybody have an idea where the script for creating it is? There are some issues, both of them causing extra tickets to appear in the changelog: 1) There are duplicate commits for variou

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-03 Thread John Cremona
After pulling the latest develop commits from trac and doing make, I get errors building the docs, starting at [combinat ] /home/jec/sage/src/doc/en/reference/combinat/algebra.rst:4: WARNING: toctree contains reference to nonexisting document u'sage/combinat/free_module' How should I fix that?

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-02 Thread Harald Schilly
Are there already somewhere the release notes? And if not, does anybody have an idea where the script for creating it is? Harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-02-01 Thread Volker Braun
All binary builds are now finished. Harald: please mirror... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-01-31 Thread John Cremona
Thanks for all the comments. Until we have dealt with the issue of moving after building, I'll just build from scratch. John On 31 January 2014 11:19, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On 2014-01-31, John Cremona wrote: >> Good! Now here is a question I have been waiting to ask: >> >> We know know that

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-01-31 Thread Volker Braun
Most binaries are now at http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/buildbot/binaries/, two more to come. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-releas

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-01-31 Thread Volker Braun
I would just build /usr/local/sage-x.y.z and then switch the symlink. That way you can also have multiple old Sage versions around if you want to. You can share the upstream folder if you make it a symlink to a common directory. On Friday, January 31, 2014 9:15:55 AM UTC, John Cremona wrote: >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-01-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-01-31, John Cremona wrote: > Good! Now here is a question I have been waiting to ask: > > We know know that it is Not A Good Idea to build Sage in one place and > move it, so when I install Sage system-wode on the machines I > administer, which I only do for full releases (not betas etc),

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-01-31 Thread John Cremona
Good! Now here is a question I have been waiting to ask: We know know that it is Not A Good Idea to build Sage in one place and move it, so when I install Sage system-wode on the machines I administer, which I only do for full releases (not betas etc), I have been building it where I want it (in

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.1 released

2014-01-30 Thread Harald Schilly
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > Source tarball is here (to be uploaded to the mirrors): Cool! I've already started to move it to the mirrors. Harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from t