Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-30 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> -installed.update(pip_installed_packages()) > +# installed.update(pip_installed_packages()) > I confirm that this change fixes the problem I mentionned earlier. Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsu

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-29 Thread leif
Sébastien Labbé wrote: > All tests passed on Ubuntu 14.04 with make ptestlong using > --optional=mpir,python2,sage > > Other than the Tutte polynomial one, I get two other slow doctests that > are not marked with #long time. I can not confirm whether it is a > regression as I don't keep my old ver

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-29 Thread Sébastien Labbé
All tests passed on Ubuntu 14.04 with make ptestlong using --optional=mpir,python2,sage Other than the Tutte polynomial one, I get two other slow doctests that are not marked with #long time. I can not confirm whether it is a regression as I don't keep my old version of sage. sage -t --long -

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-27 Thread Francois Bissey
I actually get that one on power7 with 7.4.beta1 (once I remove the bit of documentation that doesn’t build). François > On 28/08/2016, at 06:03, Steven Trogdon wrote: > > I have the following failure: > > sage: P = graphs.PetersenGraph() ## line 539 ## > sage: P.tutte_polynomial() ## line 54

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-27 Thread Thierry
Hi, while we are at it, the following file also creates timeout: src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx see for example https://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/0/debian/8.3/i686/3.16.0-4-586/tmonteil-debian-jessie-32/2016-08-26%2023:51:54 Ciao, Thierry On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 07:11:17PM

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-27 Thread Ralf Stephan
Some patchbot test failures happened because of this too. On Sat, Aug 27, 2016, 21:04 leif wrote: > leif wrote: > > Steven Trogdon wrote: > >> I have the following failure: > >> > >> sage: P = graphs.PetersenGraph() ## line 539 ## > >> sage: P.tutte_polynomial() ## line 540 ## > >> x^9 + 6*x^8 +

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-27 Thread leif
leif wrote: > Steven Trogdon wrote: >> I have the following failure: >> >> sage: P = graphs.PetersenGraph() ## line 539 ## >> sage: P.tutte_polynomial() ## line 540 ## >> x^9 + 6*x^8 + 21*x^7 + 56*x^6 + 12*x^5*y + y^6 + 114*x^5 + 70*x^4*y + >> 30*x^3*y^2 + 15*x^2*y^3 + 10*x*y^4 + 9*y^5 + 170*x^4 +

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-27 Thread Volker Braun
This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21355 On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 8:03:10 PM UTC+2, Steven Trogdon wrote: > > sage -t --long src/sage/graphs/tutte_polynomial.py # Timed out > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsu

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-27 Thread leif
Steven Trogdon wrote: > I have the following failure: > > sage: P = graphs.PetersenGraph() ## line 539 ## > sage: P.tutte_polynomial() ## line 540 ## > x^9 + 6*x^8 + 21*x^7 + 56*x^6 + 12*x^5*y + y^6 + 114*x^5 + 70*x^4*y + > 30*x^3*y^2 + 15*x^2*y^3 + 10*x*y^4 + 9*y^5 + 170*x^4 + 170*x^3*y + > 105*x

[sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4.beta2 released

2016-08-27 Thread Steven Trogdon
I have the following failure: sage: P = graphs.PetersenGraph() ## line 539 ## sage: P.tutte_polynomial() ## line 540 ## x^9 + 6*x^8 + 21*x^7 + 56*x^6 + 12*x^5*y + y^6 + 114*x^5 + 70*x^4*y + 30*x^3*y^2 + 15*x^2*y^3 + 10*x*y^4 + 9*y^5 + 170*x^4 + 170*x^3*y + 105*x^2*y^2 + 65*x*y^3 + 35*y^4 + 180*x