On Wednesday, December 25, 2019 at 1:40:43 PM UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> OTOH, final curtain on Python 2 is on Dec 31. Getting a Python 3-based
> before this might be given priority over this new"nice to have but not
> vital" feature...
>
I agree that we should have a Python3
Well, no idea actually. There is no extra script running, just "make -j2".
However, maybe there was something left from a earlier build, which I
missed (It's building from the git repo). Starting fresh after a git reset
hard and clean -fdx did resolve this! (I'm running tests right now)
sorry
PS: here are the permissions in the tarball
$ tar tvf sage-9.0.beta9.tar.gz | grep build/pkgs/python3
-rw-r--r-- release/release 130 2019-12-08 13:22
sage-9.0.beta9/build/pkgs/python3/checksums.ini
-rw-r--r-- release/release 190 2019-12-08 13:22
Is your build script doing a recursive chmod go+x by any chance? I don't
understand how you could end up with these permissions otherwise. I'm
pretty sure they aren't in the tarball.
On Thursday, December 26, 2019 at 3:04:42 PM UTC+1, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> I got a build failure (running
I got a build failure (running in an ubuntu 18.04 docker container for
cocalc). This is the whole log it says to report:
~:$ cat /ext/sage/sage-dev/logs/pkgs/python3-3.7.3.p1.log
Found local metadata for python3-3.7.3.p1
Using cached file /ext/sage/sage-dev/upstream/Python-3.7.3.tar.xz
Dear list,
Le mardi 24 décembre 2019 16:36:19 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit :
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> I'm thinking this should be
On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, ptestalllong after
upgrade of a a Python 3-based Sage 9.0.beta9 to 9.0.beta10 gets 6 transient
and 3 permanent failures:
File Result P/T
src/sage/databases/findstat.py 1 doctest failed T
src/sage/plot/animate.py 7 doctests failed T
