Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.6.rc1 released

2019-01-15 Thread E. Madison Bray
nly disagree, though I believe my suggestion is one that requires the least work for everyone involved (since it's merely a question of what arguments to pass to perform the tests). > On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 11:45:20 AM UTC+1, E. Madison Bray wrote: >> >> In fact I'd ar

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.6.rc1 released

2019-01-14 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:56 PM Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > The final 8.6 should follow real soon, so please give

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta5 released

2018-11-26 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:37 AM Steven Trogdon wrote: > > On my Gentoo changing the ownership was not sufficient. After changing the > ownership I had to > > git reset --hard HEAD > > which revealed that > > Updating f894105d0d..b36eca1990 > error: The following untracked working tree files

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.6.rc1 released

2019-01-14 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 5:18 PM Volker Braun wrote: > > Frederic, if can you make #26740 work then I'll merge it (no matter what Eric > says ;-) As I last pointed out on that ticket it doesn't even require any code changes. In fact I'd argue it doesn't even require a Makefile target, as the

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.6.rc1 released

2019-01-14 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:56 PM Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > The final 8.6 should follow real soon, so please give

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.rc0 released

2019-03-21 Thread E. Madison Bray
Could someone have a look at, and maybe give positive-review to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27385. It would be lovely if we could get this fix in 8.7, and the patch I added only affects Cygwin. Bernard Parisse has said he will fix the issue upstream but I haven't followed through yet on

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.rc0 released

2019-03-21 Thread E. Madison Bray
Thank Volker, On my Ubuntu machine, $ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS" I got one seemingly random failure I haven't seen before: sage -t --long

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta5 released

2019-02-25 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Ubuntu 14.04 I am getting a strange error when trying to build the docs. Tried `make doc-clean` to no avail: [dochtml] [categorie] /home/embray/src/sagemath/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/categories/finite_coxeter_groups.py:docstring of

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta5 released

2019-02-25 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:36 PM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Ubuntu 14.04 I am getting a strange error when trying to build the > docs. Tried `make doc-clean` to no avail: Also, when I try running the tests for sage.categories.finite_coxeter_groups I get the same failure at: sage -t

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta5 released

2019-02-25 Thread E. Madison Bray
d now. Of course, that could indicate a bug in the build system, but I'm not sure now how I would reproduce the situation. This arose in part because I was playing around with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27267 > Le 25/02/2019 à 15:39, E. Madison Bray a écrit : > > On Mon, Feb 25, 201

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7.beta7 released

2019-03-11 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:08 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, ptestlong gets one > transient failure : > > -- > sage -t --long --warn-long 146.8

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta7 released

2019-03-12 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:01 AM Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > $ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta3 released

2019-02-12 Thread E. Madison Bray
I am getting some mysterious new segfaults with this on Cygwin. On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 8:27 PM Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7.beta0 released

2019-01-24 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:40 AM wrote: > > I have the same issue with libffi ! I will look into that ASAP. It's a similar / related problem to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26996 but affecting libffi. The install target for libffi might even depend on your compiler's settings, which might

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7.beta1 released

2019-01-29 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:18 AM Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html I am getting a hang / possible error during doc building

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.beta6 released

2019-05-28 Thread E. Madison Bray
The tests should make sure nothing in ~/.gap is ever loaded if at all possible (e.g. update the GAP interfaces to add an option to disable use of ~/.gap` when running the tests, for example) On Sat, May 25, 2019, 03:22 François Bissey wrote: > We’ll want some kind of follow up. The test will

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc1 released

2019-06-14 Thread E. Madison Bray
:30 Volker Braun wrote: > I reviewed the ticket but rather not merge it at the last minute. Imho its > quite possible that it breaks something on lesser-used platforms so we > should merge it at the beginning of a release cycle, not the end. > > > On Friday, June 14, 2019 at 1

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc1 released

2019-06-14 Thread E. Madison Bray
This ticket has also been languishing for no particular reason: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27724 It was previously looked upon favorably: It is a patch to GAP that has already been accepted upstream by the GAP developers. For a time it was only held up for me to update the patch to the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.rc0 released

2019-06-12 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > > > I don't know why the rush to call this a release candidate when there are > > clearly still several outstanding problems to be resolved befo

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.rc0 released

2019-06-11 Thread E. Madison Bray
I don't know why the rush to call this a release candidate when there are clearly still several outstanding problems to be resolved before the next release. As usual absolutely zero communication of a plan or coordination with the community. On Tue, Jun 11, 2019, 02:28 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.rc0 released

2019-06-12 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:14 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 2:03 PM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 2:46 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:05 PM E. Madison Bray > > > wrote:

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.8.rc0 released

2019-06-12 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 2:46 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:05 PM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM E. Madison Bray > > > wro

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta5 released

2019-05-13 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 3:40 PM Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > baff1c42dd (tag: 8.8.beta5) Updated SageMath version

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc1 released

2019-06-14 Thread E. Madison Bray
Could somebody please review the following ticket: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27721 It has been stalled for weeks now for no good reason other than, I presume, lack of availability for someone to review it. I would really like this ticket to be resolved and merged before making an 8.8

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.rc1 released

2019-06-14 Thread E. Madison Bray
by someone. I marked the issue as "critical" and not "blocker" only because I can technically work around it, but shouldn't have to. Unless there's a serious reason to rush this release please resolve this issue first. On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, 10:59 E. Madison Bray wrote: >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7.beta6 released

2019-08-15 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:22 PM kcrisman wrote: > > >> That's expected. The package build directory is under SAGE_LOCAL >> ($SAGE_LOCAL/var/tmp/sage/build/gap-4.10.0.p0) but the file's >> destination path ($SAGE_LOCAL) is appended to this. This is how it's >> supposed to work (DESTDIR

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7.beta6 released

2019-08-15 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:50 PM kcrisman wrote: > > upgrading from some early 8.6 beta, I get something weird with file > permissions on gap. Everything seems to go well, but: > > > > pkg/laguna-3.9.0 -> >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7.beta6 released

2019-08-16 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:58 PM Markus Wageringel wrote: > > This also happened to me a few weeks ago. The underlying problem seems to be > that the uninstall script fails because it tries to call sage-dist-helpers, > but cannot find it. This file has recently been moved from src/bin to >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta4 released

2019-08-06 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:45 PM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Le vendredi 2 août 2019 18:07:16 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit : >> >> >> >> On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 3:31:07 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Le vendredi 2 août 2019 01:00:29 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit :

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta8 released

2019-08-26 Thread E. Madison Bray
IMO we should go forward with 8.9 for now and make the next version 9.0. By then Python 3 support will be even more solid. On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 16:54 Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > The second file should have been fixed by > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28312 > > but it was probably not

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-04 Thread E. Madison Bray
Although it might be a little late, at this point, if we want to make sure it's well-enough tested, I think we should try to include the following in 8.9 final: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28356 As discussed when the first version of this code was added, it's actually reasonably robust and

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-06 Thread E. Madison Bray
Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP: sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py ** File "src/sage/tests/cmdline.py", line 535, in sage.tests.cmdline.test_executable Failed

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-06 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP: > > sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py > ** > Fi