Re: [sage-release] Re: Binary tarballs for Sage 6.0

Here is what I think should be fixed in the sage_bdist_osx function: to produce the non-app version, set SAGE_APP_BUNDLE and SAGE_APP_DMG to 'no'; then to produce the app version, set SAGE_APP_BUNDLE and SAGE_APP_DMG to 'yes'. Best, Samuel -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.3.beta6 released

Thank you for this new release! - Successfully ran 'make' and 'make testlong' on Mac OS X 10.9. -- All tests passed! -- Total time for all

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.3.beta6 released

Volker Braun wrote: #16455 is in beta5, but note that it doesn't make zmq/pyzmq standard packages (=installed by default). You still have to run sage -f zeromq sage -f pyzmq Thanks Volker for clarifying this. So, is the following correct? - with Sage 6.3.beta4, or earlier, use sage -i

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.beta1 released

Harald, If mirrorring the latest devel tarballs is no longer on the agenda, would it be possible to just change that page on the mirrors, with basic information such as: - the devel tarballs are no longer mirrorred - see the sage-release mailing list on google groups for announcements of the

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.3 released

From: Volker Braun Subject: Sage 6.3 released Thanks! On Mac OS X 10.10 Yosemite Public Beta 2 (released last Friday, 2014-08-21), building Sage 6.3 fails while building gcc. Logs: http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/install.log.tgz

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.3 released

2014-08-27 19:56 GMT+02:00 Volker Braun: Please post the config.log from inside the gcc build dir. Here: http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/config.log.tgz (it's the config.log file which I found in the directory sage-6.3/local/var/tmp/sage/build/gcc-4.7.3.p1/gcc-build/ I hope that's

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.3 released

2014-08-28 0:46 GMT+02:00 Volker Braun: Thats not the right config.log, the error was in the libgcc subdirectory. Changed: http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/config.log.tgz (it's now the config.log file which I found in the directory

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (ipython notebook and ssl)

Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: - On http://sagemath.org/download-linux.html, there is no longer the mirror in Paris 6 University. This is fixed now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [sage-release] Sage Debian Live 6.5 released

2015-03-08 19:11 GMT+01:00 Thierry: thanks to #17806 (that fixes a compilation issue with mpir on 32 bits systems) Sage Debian Live 6.5 is now out and is accessible from (refreshed) Sage mirrors. Cool! Bootstrapped as usually from up-to-date Debian stable packages, this 6.5 release sees

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.6.beta0 released

2015-02-20 17:08 GMT+01:00 Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:52 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: Are the sizes on http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/sagemath/sage-mirror/devel/index.html correct? For example, I am finding that the download of the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.7 released

I emailed the maintainer of the LIP6 mirror to tell them about the new rsync address to use, it should be back in sync soon. Samuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[sage-release] SageMath ova releases: buildbot slave needed

Just to advertise this sage-support thread https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-support/U0z03oPRM_g/discussion here on sage-devel and sage-release. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-release group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.8 released

I don't remember if we sorted out who is in charge of emailing sage-announce with the announcements for stable releases. I can volunteer to do it. Samuel 2015-07-26 16:15 GMT+02:00 Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com: The master and develop branch both have been updated to the 6.8 release!

Re: [sage-release] Ubuntu PPA package and Jupyter notebook

To rebuild python, use sudo sage -f python2 sudo sage -f python3 and NOT sudo sage -f python 2015-09-10 22:28 GMT+02:00 Eric Gourgoulhon : > Hi, > > While testing the Ubuntu package sagemath-upstream-binary-full from AIMS PPA > (cf. this thread), I've tried

[sage-release] Ubuntu PPA and interactive access to the documentation

Hello, My university has a few teaching rooms equipped with computers where SageMath is installed. Some of these rooms depend on the University IT staff, some on the Math Dept IT staff. In either case they run Ubuntu, and I think SageMath is installed using the Ubuntu PPA, version 6.6 or in some

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.0 virtual appliance

2016-01-27 17:39 GMT+00:00 William Stein : > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> Le mardi 26 janvier 2016 20:17:22 UTC, William Stein a écrit : >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Volker Braun wrote: >>> > On Tuesday, January 26, 2016

[sage-release] recent woes with relocation of SageMath installation directory

Dear sage-support (cc: sage-release, sage-devel) (please reply on sage-support only) I received the following question after announcing Sage 7.0 on sage-announce. This is one of many such questions I am reading on various lists and sites recently. Something needs to be more clearly documented,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.6.beta2 released

2017-02-03 18:28 GMT+01:00 Daniel Krenn : > On 2017-02-01 22:39, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > > branch. > > Fresh clone on Linux Mint 17.3, make ptestlong reports > > sage -t --long src/sage/interfaces/expect.py # 1

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.6.beta2 released

2017-02-04 11:32 GMT+01:00 Volker Braun: > I think its likely that you have some local configuration, probably > ipython, > that is being picked up accidentally. The failures all come from switching > on > ascii colors even though they shoudn't be for doctests. > In any case I can't reproduce it.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.4 released

The changelog is produced after each release by Jeroen by running some scripts of his. Unfortunately this happens on one of the machines that William has now turned off. ​ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.0 released

This would be a good time to update the list of supported platforms. Both the "Supported platforms" section of the "installing from source" documentation page and the "Supported platforms" wiki page it points to are quite out of date. [0]

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1 released

2017-12-10 18:20 GMT+01:00 Samuel Lelièvre <samuel.lelie...@gmail.com>: > > 2017-12-08 1:06 GMT+01:00 Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com>: > > > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.1. As always, > > you can get the lat

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.1 released

2017-12-08 1:06 GMT+01:00 Volker Braun : > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.1. As always, > you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at >

Re: [sage-release] Release process

2018-05-07 17:08 GMT+02:00 Erik Bray: > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Jeroen Demeyer: > > (starting a new thread for the discussion about the current very slow pace > > of merging tickets) > > > > On 2018-05-07 16:28, Erik Bray wrote: > >> > >> If it's not clear, shall I write up some more

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2 released

2018-05-06 10:56 GMT+02:00 Volker Braun : > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.1. In this case, Sage 8.2. > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" > git branch. In this case, the "master" git branch. > Alternatively, the

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.3.beta0 released

Would changing the doctest from sage: pol.roots(multiplicities=False, proof=False) to sage: sorted(pol.roots(multiplicities=False, proof=False)) solve this? 2018-05-16 10:16 GMT+02:00 Dima Pasechnik : > in this case doctest basically compares strings, > obtained

Re: [sage-release] Re: Release process

2018-05-15 18:59 GMT+02:00 Volker Braun : > > If you want better merge conflict information: extend the > "git releasemgr merge " script (part of the > git-trac repo) to diagnose which ticket the conflict came > from. Then I'll be happy to include that info when setting >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta2 released

Under macOS 10.10.5, the build failed on pillow-3.3.0. http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/install.log http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/pillow-3.3.0.log -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.2.beta2 released

Mux* WebPNewInternal(int); > ^~~ > /usr/local/include/webp/mux.h:107:20: error: expected '=', ',', ';', > 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token > WEBP_EXTERN WebPMux* WebPNewInternal(int); > > > using brew? > > François > > > On 10/01/2018, at 0

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc2 released

On macOS 10.10.5 (aka "Yosemite"), with Homebrew installed, after renaming /usr/local and /opt/local so they don't interfere, building Sage 8.2.rc2 succeeds. However, trying to install jupyterlab via pip does not work: $ sage --pip install jupyterlab Collecting jupyterlab Could not

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc2 released

2018-04-12 23:21 GMT+02:00 Samuel Lelièvre <samuel.lelie...@gmail.com>: > > On macOS 10.10.5 (aka "Yosemite"), with Homebrew installed, > after renaming /usr/local and /opt/local so they don't interfere, > building Sage 8.2.rc2 succeeds. > > However, trying

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc2 released

2018-04-13 0:28 GMT+02:00 Samuel Lelièvre <samuel.lelie...@gmail.com>: > > 2018-04-12 23:21 GMT+02:00 Samuel Lelièvre <samuel.lelie...@gmail.com>: > > > > On macOS 10.10.5 (aka "Yosemite"), with Homebrew installed, > > after renaming /usr/local and /o

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc1 released

2018-04-03 13:13 GMT+02:00 Eric Gourgoulhon : > > Le mardi 3 avril 2018 12:17:20 UTC+2, Erik Bray a écrit : >> >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon >> wrote: >> > Since we have entered the 8.2.rc cycle, may I ask about the status of the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

Under macOS 10.10.5 Yosemite, starting from the tarball, the build fails on cysignals-1.7.0 (this was also the case for 8.2.rc3, while all previous rc and beta compiled fine). Here is the corresponding log file: http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/cysignals-1.7.0.p0.log I will try

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc4 released

2018-04-21 10:47 GMT+02:00 Samuel Lelièvre <samuel.lelie...@gmail.com>: > > Under macOS 10.10.5 Yosemite, starting from the tarball, > the build fails on cysignals-1.7.0 (this was also the case > for 8.2.rc3, while all previous rc and beta compiled fine). > > Here is th

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc3 released

Under macOS 10.10.5, while Sage 8.2.rc2 builds fine, building Sage 8.2.rc3 fails while building cysignals 1.7.0. ​ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc1 released

2018-04-01 21:39 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Charpentier < emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com>: > > A couple more data points, currently observed on Debian testing, using Debian's packaging(s) of Java (one can switch from one to the other via update-java-alternatives) : > > with Java 8 (current in stable) : >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc1 released

I would also like to advocate getting the following tickets in Sage 8.2: - #21022: version information in sage.__version__ https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21022 (long awaited by downstream projects, such as flipper) - #25050: Allow braid computation for more links

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc1 released

2018-04-02 21:38 GMT+02:00 Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be>: > On 2018-04-02 18:18, Samuel Lelièvre wrote: > >> I would also like to advocate getting the following tickets in Sage 8.2: >> > > I nominate https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25047 > > It's really

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.beta8 released

2018-03-16 12:56 GMT+01:00 kcrisman : > > I guess Sage *is* under 40 as of yet! Depends how you count. The summarny at Openhub https://www.openhub.net/p/sage says it took an estimated 172 years of effort! This is according to an analysis using the Constructive Cost

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.4 released

Under macOS 10.10.5. $ cd /opt/s $ ORIG=http://files.sagemath.org/osx/intel $ TB=sage-8.4-OSX_10.13.6-x86_64.tar.bz2 $ curl -C - --retry 99 -O $ORIG/$TB ... $ tar xf $TB $ cd SageMath/ $ ./sage Rewriting paths for your new installation directory

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta1 released

Is it possible that no language preferences are set in your browser, but that setting them to English would override your locale? Samuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.4.beta7 released

Wed 2018-10-03 12:36 UTC+2, Travis Scrimshaw: > > On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 7:35:08 PM UTC+10, Kwankyu Lee wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 3:14:32 PM UTC+9, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >>> >>> I believe there is a Heisenbug in src/sage/rings/function_field/ideal.py. >>> Here is a

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta5 released

> As far as I can recall 'git pull' was always done as a normal user. > Note the timestamp on the folders, which predates 8.5.beta4. > And this issue did not manifest itself then. But going forward, > how to correct things? Change to your SAGE_ROOT directory and run this as a normal user $

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.7 released

Sun 2019-03-24 00:41 UTC, Volker Braun: > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.7. On Debian 9.8 ("stretch"), from a fresh git clone, building python2-based SageMath with as many optional and experimental packages as I could install gives the following: - "make": success - "make

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.8.beta7 released

Sun 2019-06-02 19:04 UTC, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release: > > PS: timeouts on the MBP’s may be due to their habit of sleeping > if ignored for too long. I have yet to figure out why, and persuade > them to knock it off. (I have them on power when testing, and > settings off that induce

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.7 released

Thanks Éric, John, Simon! After installing the relevant LaTeX language packages, "make doc-pdf" completed successfully. $ sudo apt-get install \ texlive-lang-cyrillic\ texlive-lang-english \ texlive-lang-european\ texlive-lang-french \

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta8 released

Mon 2019-08-25 22:37 UTC, Volker Braun: > > [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta8 released Thanks! > It is nearing the end of the 8.9 merge window, so if you want > something merged then this is your last chance. Would love to see 28384, 28366, 28365 be merged in the next beta or release candidate in

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta8 released

Mon 2019-08-26 20:24 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre: > > Sun 2019-08-25 22:37 UTC, Volker Braun: > > > > [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta8 released > > > > It is nearing the end of the 8.9 merge window, so if you want > > something merged then this is your last chance. >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.rc0 released

Thanks Volker for releasing SageMath 8.9.rc0. On Cygwin64 in Windows 7, updated a py2 and a py3 Sage from 8.9.beta8 using `git pull origin develop`. Running `make` worked for both. Here is what running `make testlong` gave in each case. ## py2 Two files had failures, not reproduced when run

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

## Debian On Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster), upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git and tested SageMath 8.9, both py2 and py3. In both cases: - `make`: ok - `make testlong`: all tests pass! ## Cygwin On Cygwin64, tested SageMath 8.9, both py2 and py3, with the following hardware and operating

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.rc1 released

Thu 2019-09-26 06:21 UTC, Markus Wageringel: > > With Python 2, I got a (transient) timeout in > > src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py > > There seems to be a race condition. It is difficult for me to reproduce. > Has anyone seen this before? Yes, it comes up once in a while. See previous

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.rc1 released

Thanks Volker for releasing Sage 8.9.rc1. Any chance to include #28041 in Sage 8.9.rc2? This would help with continuous integration. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28041 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

Le lun. 30 sept. 2019 à 01:19, Volker Braun: > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.9. [...] > > There was no change over 8.9.rc1 Thanks for the release! Will there be py2 and py3 binaries for SageMath 8.9? Also, a problem some users faced with the macOS binary for SageMath 8.8

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.rc1 released

Le sam. 28 sept. 2019 à 00:03, Volker Braun: > > I think rc1 is going to be equal to the release unless something > happens by tomorrow or so... But I'll be happy to merge it in 9.0.beta0 Alright. Merging a ticket that changes the Makefile might fit better in a beta0 than in an rc2 anyway. Good

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

Le mar. 1 oct. 2019 à 12:38, John Cremona: > > For a change instead of updating the git repository to build 8.9 I downloaded > the file 8.9.tar.gz from the Releases section on github. After unpacking and > "make configure" I then did "make". Shouldn't there be an extra step between `make

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta0 released

Thanks Dima for your suggestions. Following them, I installed more cygwin packages, then ran git pull origin develop make distclean make configure ./configure --with-python=3 make -j4 The build, now aiming to build Sage 9.0.beta3, failed on ecm and glpk. See log files: -

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta2 released

Thu 2019-10-24 20:44 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:42 PM Isuru Fernando wrote: > > > > Try adding `export SINGULAR_CONFIGURE="--without-python"` and then retry. > > Looks like the system python installation is broken when building > > extensions. > > it's not even "system

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta0 released

Tue 2019-10-29 06:30 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 5:24:07 PM UTC+3, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> Volker wrote: >> >> > 533fd5d6cd (HEAD -> develop, tag: 9.0.beta0, trac/develop) Updated >> > SageMath version to 9.0.beta0 >> >> [...] >> >> > 93b86bfad3 Trac #24824: Update

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0.beta2 released

Le mar. 29 oct. 2019 à 20:41, Isuru Fernando a écrit : > > Hi Samuel, > > Can you open a ticket? Either singular should depend on the python package or > --without-python should be passed to configure to avoid surprises like this. > > Isuru This is now - Sage Trac ticket 28676 Clarify

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta8 released

I think we should maintain Python2 compatibility at least for this version. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta0 released

Volker wrote: > 533fd5d6cd (HEAD -> develop, tag: 9.0.beta0, trac/develop) Updated SageMath > version to 9.0.beta0 [...] > 93b86bfad3 Trac #24824: Update GLPK to 4.65 [...] On Cygwin64 on Windows 7, building GLPK fails with the following configure error: [glpk-4.65.p0] checking for

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta10 released

Tue 2019-12-24 15:36 UTC, Volker Braun: > > I'm thinking this should be the last beta so, so rc0 will be next. Exciting! > Happy Holidays everyone! Happy holidays Volker! > fcadfadd4e (tag: 9.0.beta10, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to > 9.0.beta10 On one laptop, - MacBook Air, Early

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.0 released

Sat 2020-01-04 17:34 UTC, John Cremona: > > Apologies now I see that some of the earlier thread on this topic > was started by me with similar issues (on a different machine). > I just don't remember such things these days. The sooner I can > find someone else to be sysadmin for the 8 or so

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.rc0 released

Le jeu. 26 déc. 2019 à 18:24, Volker Braun: > > 746a826377 (trac/develop, tag: 9.0.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.rc0 Please include #28910 in Sage 9.0. It touches no code, it's just a badge update for DockerHub to show Sage is maintained as of 2020.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta10 released

Le jeu. 26 déc. 2019 à 00:28, Samuel Lelièvre: > > On one laptop, > - MacBook Air, Early 2014 > - macOS 10.14.6 Mojave > - Homebrew installed with many packages > - "git pull origin develop" from 9.0.beta9 > - "./configure --with-python=3 && mak

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.rc0 released

Le ven. 27 déc. 2019 à 03:11, Samuel Lelièvre a écrit : > > Le jeu. 26 déc. 2019 à 18:24, Volker Braun: > > > > 746a826377 (trac/develop, tag: 9.0.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.rc0 > > Please include #28910 in Sage 9.0. It touches no code, > it's just a badge u

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.rc0 released

On a MacBook Air with macOS 10.14.6 Mojave, after `git pull origin develop && make` from a working Sage 9.0.beta10 built for Python 3, ran `make testlong` and got: "All tests passed!". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.rc0 released

Thu 2019-12-26 à 23:24 UTC, Volker Braun: > > 746a826377 (trac/develop, tag: 9.0.rc0) Updated SageMath version to 9.0.rc0 Computer, OS, build choices: - iMac, Mid 2015 - macOS 10.14.6 Mojave - build for Python 2 - build Sage's `gcc` and `openssl` packages - build Sage's Python with its `_ssl`

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.0.rc0 released

Le sam. 28 déc. 2019 à 02:12, Samuel Lelièvre: > > Computer, OS, build choices: > > - iMac, Mid 2015 > - macOS 10.14.6 Mojave > - build for Python 2 > - build Sage's `gcc` and `openssl` packages > - build Sage's Python with its `_ssl` and `_tkinter` modules > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.1.rc1 released

Thu 2020-04-23 à 09:09, Dima Pasechnik: > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020, 14:55 Samuel Lelievre: >> >> > Subject: Sage 9.1.rc1 released >> >> On macOS 10.14.6 Mojave with lots of Homebrew >> packages installed, failed to build Pillow. Logs: >> >> https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/sage3logs.zip > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.rc4 released!

> From: Volker Braun > To: sage-release > Date: Sat 2020-05-09 10:22 UTC > Subject: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.rc4 released! > > > Now would be a good time for you to test ;-) Thanks for this new release. Tested on two systems. ## Debian 9 ``` $ make ptestlong [...]

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.1.rc3 released

# Building SageMath 9.1.rc3 on Debian 9 Based on a working Sage 9.1.rc2. ## Configure ``` $ git pull origin develop --tags [...] $ make configure [...] $ ./configure [...] ``` The `./configure` step recommends: ``` $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install libboost-dev coinor-cbc

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

Thanks for this new development release! On a MacBook Air (early 2014) with macOS 10.14.6 Mojave, with Homebrew (but having removed Homebrew packages gcc@9, python@3.7, arb, flint, gap, singular), `make` succeeds but `make testlong` fails unexpectedly still referring to python@3.7. For example:

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta12 released

2020-09-11 17:55 UTC, Markus Wageringel: > > With a clean build on Ubuntu 20.04, ptestlong passes, but Jupyter > does not start anymore due to an SSL problem, using Sage's Python 3. > (The system Python 3.8 is not picked up because of missing > dependencies sqlite and xz, but that is ok.) > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta11 released

2020-08-02 21:30 UTC, Volker Braun: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" > git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > c353bce995 (tag: 9.2.beta11, trac/develop) Updated SageMath version to

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.rc1 released

2020-10-11 01:49 UTC, Matthias Köppe: > > Volker, thanks for preparing the new release candidate. Looks like > we are converging. But I would hope that we can still get the > positively reviewed "critical" tickets (only the ones that are marked > "milestone 9.2") into the release. That would be

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.rc1 released

Le dim. 11 oct. 2020 à 06:22, Samuel Lelièvre a écrit : > > 2020-10-11 01:49 UTC, Matthias Köppe: > > > > Volker, thanks for preparing the new release candidate. Looks like > > we are converging. But I would hope that we can still get the > > positively reviewed &qu

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.rc1 released

2020-10-11 15:44 UTC, Andy Howell: > > Ubuntu 20.04 Incremental build OK, tests failed. Did clean rebuild. These > two failed: > > sage -t --long --warn-long 55.4 --random-seed=0 > src/sage/interfaces/singular.py # Killed due to segmentation fault > sage-t --long --warn-long 55.4

Re: [sage-release] zenodo (DOI) for Sage releases is back!

Added to the Sage 9.1 Release Tour. Le mar. 6 oct. 2020 à 22:46, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > We've recovered the settings for getting DOI for Sage releases via > zenodo, something that was broken for years. > cf https://zenodo.org/record/4066866 > and this is DOI for Sage 9.1:

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

2020-08-1 01:13 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre: > > Building succeeded on Debian 10. Tests (testlong) succeeded too. > > $ make testlong > All tests passed! > > Then I tried > > $ make testalllong > > and to my surprise it built sagelib and dochtml anew. >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta7 released

The failures all have to do with the locale. Do we have a meta-ticket for locale-related problems? Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 20:16, Kenji Iohara a écrit : > > I could compile on Mac OS.10.15.6 without installing gcc@9. > Make ptestlong gives me an error > > -- > You received this message because you

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

2020-07-31 à 09:58 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > Do you have another copy of libecl*.dylib or libecl*.so somewhere in > /usr/local ? > > (or just ecl*.[dylib,so] - I recall at some point the naming was off) Here is what I have: ``` $ find /usr/local -iname "ecl*.so" $ find /usr/local -iname

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

2020-07-31 12:29 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:43 PM Samuel Lelièvre: > > > > 2020-07-31 à 09:58 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > > > > > Do you have another copy of libecl*.dylib or libecl*.so somewhere in > > > /usr/local ? > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

2020-07-31 13:01 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 1:40 PM Samuel Lelièvre: > > > > 2020-07-31 12:29 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > > > > > I guess all of them are actually links to > > > /usr/local/Cellar/ecl/20.4.24/lib/libecl.20.4.24.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

2020-08-01 01:13 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre: > > [...] > On macOS with Homebrew, `make` finally succeeded. > [...] > After that I ran `make testlong` and it started by > - rebuilding sagelib > [...] The result of `make testlong` was: All tests passed! I then ran `make testa

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta8 released

2020-08-13 05:35 UTC, John H Palmieri: > > I'm having a problem with this on OS X: both with an incremental > upgrade (after doing "make doc-clean") and a build from scratch, > the build hangs during the docbuilding stage. Same here with this configuration: - MacBook Air, Early 2014 - macOS

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta8 released

Le mar. 11 août 2020 à 00:51, Volker Braun a écrit : > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" > git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Thanks! On Debian 10, success with `make`, and a few

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta8 released

2020-08-13 11:35 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre: > > Thanks! On Debian 10, success with `make`, and a few transient > timeouts and failures for `make testalllong`. > > Doctesting these files individually afterwards, > each of them gave "All tests passed!" ... but that's because

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

Building succeeded on Debian 10. Tests (testlong) succeeded too. $ make testlong All tests passed! Then I tried $ make testalllong and to my surprise it built sagelib and dochtml anew. A number of files timed out or had failing doctests, see further email. On macOS with Homebrew,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

> Date: 2020-07-26 00:20 UTC > From: Volker Braun > To: sage-release > Subject: Sage 9.2.beta6 released > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" > git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Thanks

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

2020-07-29 18:13 UTC, Matthias Köppe: > > On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 4:37:52 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> The errors seem to involve Flint. I have Flint 2.6.1 from Homebrew. >> >> Should I >> - uninstall Homebrew's flint and try again? > > Yes please, so that we can get

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta6 released

2020-07-30 18:39 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > [manifolds] ImportError: > dlopen(/opt/s/sage92b6/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sage/libs/ecl.cpython-37m-darwin.so, > 2): Symbol not found: _ > ecl_process_env > [manifolds] Referenced from: >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta2 released

2020-11-26 23:24 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > the 2nd line should be > > locale.setlocale(locale.LC_ALL,'') > > (I don't know why you ended up with " instead of '' in the first > place, probably your keyboard has a setting that automatically > converts '' into ") > > HTML email is evil, too - I think

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

2020-11-01 19:23 UTC, John H Palmieri: > > On Sunday, November 1, 2020 at 7:29:31 AM UTC-8, David Coudert wrote: >> >> Surprisingly, I still get the recommendation to run : >> brew install pandoc ffmpeg imagemagick texinfo >> So something must be wrong somewhere, but what? > > I don't know what's

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta5 released

2020-12-28 00:11 UTC, Volker Braun: > > 9d686f22f4 (trac/develop, tag: 9.3.beta5) Updated SageMath version to > 9.3.beta5 Thanks for this new release. It built fine here: - macOS 10.14.6 with lots of Homebrew packages installed - make: ok; make testlong: All tests passed! whereas for Sage

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta1 released

Thanks for the new release. On Debian 10 buster - `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet - `make -s V=0` -- ok - `make -s V=0 doc-pdf` -- ok - `make -s V=0 testlong` -- all tests pass On Ubuntu 20.04: - `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet -

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta1 released

Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 18:30, Samuel Lelièvre: > > Thanks for the new release. > > On Debian 10 buster > - `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet > - `make -s V=0` -- ok > - `make -s V=0 doc-pdf` -- ok > - `make -s V=0 testlong` -- al

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.4.beta1 released

Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 21:35, Samuel Lelièvre: > > Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 18:30, Samuel Lelièvre: > > > > Thanks for the new release. > > > > On Debian 10 buster > > - `./bootstrap -q && ./configure -q` -- ok but lost a lot of quiet > > - `ma

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3 released

On a colleague's machine: - iMac with intel i5 processor - macOS 11 - installing from SageMath 9.3 macOS 11 binary After downloading and extracting the binary tarball, running Sage launches the relocation process, then displays the banner, two syntax warnings, and the prompt. ```

  1   2   >