Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-12 Thread John H Palmieri
On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 3:13:07 AM UTC-7, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray > wrote: > > > > Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in > GAP: > > > > sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:13 AM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > > > Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP: > > > > sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py > >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-06 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP: > > sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py > ** > File

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-06 Thread E. Madison Bray
Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP: sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py ** File "src/sage/tests/cmdline.py", line 535, in sage.tests.cmdline.test_executable Failed

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-04 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
> On Sep 2, 2019, at 16:22 , Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html And again: As with 8.9-b6, 8.9-b7, and -b8, the

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:30 AM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > Although it might be a little late, at this point, if we want to make > sure it's well-enough tested, I think we should try to include the > following in 8.9 final: > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28356 yes please, and also two

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-04 Thread E. Madison Bray
Although it might be a little late, at this point, if we want to make sure it's well-enough tested, I think we should try to include the following in 8.9 final: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28356 As discussed when the first version of this code was added, it's actually reasonably robust and

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-03 Thread François Bissey
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28271 broke the building of the pdf doc. See https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/549 I’ll have a follow up at some point in the next 24hours. The ticket introduced a unicode “minus” sign at

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-02 Thread Henri Girard
Ubuntu 19.10 (+1) beta, AMD 8x 64 bits 16 Go RAM Le 26/08/2019 à 08:18, Henri Girard a écrit : Ubuntu 19.10 (+1) beta, AMD 8x 64 bits 16 Go RAM Compilation ok works fine (from beta 7 to 8) Le 26/08/2019 à 00:37, Volker Braun a écrit : As always, you can get the latest beta version from the

[sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-02 Thread Volker Braun
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html bdf4b23d74 (trac/develop, tag: 8.9.beta9) Updated SageMath version to 8.9.beta9 c631202c12 Trac #28411: refresh