On Friday, September 6, 2019 at 3:13:07 AM UTC-7, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray > wrote:
> >
> > Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in
> GAP:
> >
> > sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py
>
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:13 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP:
> >
> > sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py
> >
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP:
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py
> **
> File
Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP:
sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py
**
File "src/sage/tests/cmdline.py", line 535, in
sage.tests.cmdline.test_executable
Failed
> On Sep 2, 2019, at 16:22 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
And again:
As with 8.9-b6, 8.9-b7, and -b8, the
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:30 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Although it might be a little late, at this point, if we want to make
> sure it's well-enough tested, I think we should try to include the
> following in 8.9 final:
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28356
yes please, and also two
Although it might be a little late, at this point, if we want to make
sure it's well-enough tested, I think we should try to include the
following in 8.9 final:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28356
As discussed when the first version of this code was added, it's
actually reasonably robust and
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28271 broke the building of the pdf doc.
See https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/549
I’ll have a follow up at some point in the next 24hours. The ticket introduced
a unicode “minus” sign at
Ubuntu 19.10 (+1) beta, AMD 8x 64 bits 16 Go RAM
Le 26/08/2019 à 08:18, Henri Girard a écrit :
Ubuntu 19.10 (+1) beta, AMD 8x 64 bits 16 Go RAM
Compilation ok works fine (from beta 7 to 8)
Le 26/08/2019 à 00:37, Volker Braun a écrit :
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the
As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
bdf4b23d74 (trac/develop, tag: 8.9.beta9) Updated SageMath version to
8.9.beta9
c631202c12 Trac #28411: refresh
10 matches
Mail list logo