Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-11 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, 16:04 Thierry, wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:50:41PM -0500, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I can't post there on ask.* from phone, I believe that installing > > libncurses5-dev and libreadline-dev should allow the build to use system > > readline. > > Unfortunately, what i

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-11 Thread Thierry
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:50:41PM -0500, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > I can't post there on ask.* from phone, I believe that installing > libncurses5-dev and libreadline-dev should allow the build to use system > readline. Unfortunately, what i understand from the post, the user does not have root

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-11 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I can't post there on ask.* from phone, I believe that installing libncurses5-dev and libreadline-dev should allow the build to use system readline. this is how we made it work on John's machines. Naturally, the *.m4 files must not be removed, and Sage's ncurses package uninstalled with make

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-11 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, 12:36 Thierry, wrote: > Thanks for your answer, please could you cc me if you open a ticket ? > I will - might take a bit of time, as I am travelling from IMA at UMN back to UK today. > > Ciao, > Thierry > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:27:28PM -0500, Dima Pasechnik wrote:

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-11 Thread Thierry
Thanks for your answer, please could you cc me if you open a ticket ? Ciao, Thierry On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:27:28PM -0500, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > yuck, this is a symptome of underlinking in readline. > In their infinite wisdom readline's devs refuse to fix this old bug; > it needs to be

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-11 Thread Dima Pasechnik
yuck, this is a symptome of underlinking in readline. In their infinite wisdom readline's devs refuse to fix this old bug; it needs to be linked with libtinfo or other suchlike library, and it keeps resufacings in various forms... I think I've made a patch to sage's readline for this, but it

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-11 Thread Thierry
Hi, there is also a readline-related issue on 8.9 there: https://ask.sagemath.org/question/48276/building-sage-89-from-source-fails/ Ciao, Thierry On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:46:00PM -0500, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:27 AM John Cremona wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-07 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:00 PM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:57 PM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > > > When building from scratch on Cygwin I am getting some errors related > > to OMP-related symbols being missing when linking a Sage module that > > uses fflas-ffpack;

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-07 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:57 PM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > When building from scratch on Cygwin I am getting some errors related > to OMP-related symbols being missing when linking a Sage module that > uses fflas-ffpack; specifically sage.libs.linbox_flint_interface: > > [sagelib-8.9] g++ -shared

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-07 Thread E. Madison Bray
When building from scratch on Cygwin I am getting some errors related to OMP-related symbols being missing when linking a Sage module that uses fflas-ffpack; specifically sage.libs.linbox_flint_interface: [sagelib-8.9] g++ -shared -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base -L/opt/sagemath-8.9/local/lib

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:27 AM John Cremona wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 09:07, John Cremona wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 02:22, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >>> >>> something did not work as you installed libncurses5-dev, >>> as you still appear to miss >>> /usr/include/ncurses.h

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-02 Thread John Cremona
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 09:07, John Cremona wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 02:22, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> something did not work as you installed libncurses5-dev, >> as you still appear to miss >> /usr/include/ncurses.h >> (according to the new log: >> configure:10315: checking for

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
something did not work as you installed libncurses5-dev, as you still appear to miss /usr/include/ncurses.h (according to the new log: configure:10315: checking for ncurses.h configure:10315: result: no ) whereas https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/amd64/libncurses5-dev/filelist has this file

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Le mar. 1 oct. 2019 à 12:38, John Cremona: > > For a change instead of updating the git repository to build 8.9 I downloaded > the file 8.9.tar.gz from the Releases section on github. After unpacking and > "make configure" I then did "make". Shouldn't there be an extra step between `make

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
> On Sep 29, 2019, at 16:19 , Volker Braun wrote: > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.9. As always, you can get > the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the > self-contained source tarball is at >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread Isuru Fernando
conda packages are available now. We are now patch free except for https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28533 on Debian based distributions. There are a couple of warnings in werkzeug that was not present when I tested 8.8. Other than that, few test failures from 8.8 remain the same. Isuru. On Tue,

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Hi John, Do you have libncurses5-dev installed? I guess not, as in your config.log I see conftest.cpp:56:21: fatal error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory and this header is provided by this package. I'd say it's a bug in Ubunty xenial that libreadline-dev does not depend on this package!

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread John Cremona
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 13:42, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:43 PM John Cremona > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:08, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:59 PM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> > > >> > It seems that these machines don't have

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:43 PM John Cremona wrote: > > > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:08, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:59 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> > >> > It seems that these machines don't have readline development files >> > properly installed. >> > >> > Could you

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:59 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > It seems that these machines don't have readline development files > properly installed. > > Could you attach config.log ? > I mean the "main" config.log, not the ones from package builds. > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:38 PM John Cremona

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
It seems that these machines don't have readline development files properly installed. Could you attach config.log ? On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:38 PM John Cremona wrote: > > For a change instead of updating the git repository to build 8.9 I downloaded > the file 8.9.tar.gz from the Releases

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-10-01 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
## Debian On Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster), upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git and tested SageMath 8.9, both py2 and py3. In both cases: - `make`: ok - `make testlong`: all tests pass! ## Cygwin On Cygwin64, tested SageMath 8.9, both py2 and py3, with the following hardware and operating

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9 released

2019-09-29 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Le lun. 30 sept. 2019 à 01:19, Volker Braun: > > The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-8.9. [...] > > There was no change over 8.9.rc1 Thanks for the release! Will there be py2 and py3 binaries for SageMath 8.9? Also, a problem some users faced with the macOS binary for SageMath 8.8