[sage-support] Re: Categorizing Sage's documentation

2007-08-25 Thread Ted Kosan
William wrote: So maybe the docstring for a function might have something like. SUBJECTS: Algebra.Combinatorics, Analysis.ComplexFunctions Something like this seems like a really good idea. My thought with the hierarchical tags is that they would allow the above function to be returned in

[sage-support] Re: Categorizing Sage's documentation

2007-08-25 Thread David Joyner
On 8/25/07, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William wrote: So maybe the docstring for a function might have something like. SUBJECTS: Algebra.Combinatorics, Analysis.ComplexFunctions Something like this seems like a really good idea. My thought with the hierarchical tags is that

[sage-support] Re: Sage won't start maxima

2007-08-25 Thread William Stein
On 8/25/07, gsage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Kubuntu. I used the binary Sage to run. It all runs fine both cli browser, however, it fails to run Maxima. The error message is RuntimeError: Unable to start maxima. I can run maxima manually within the Sage folder. I'm assuming the

[sage-support] Re: Sage won't start maxima

2007-08-25 Thread gsage
On Aug 25, 2:28 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/25/07, gsage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Kubuntu. I used the binary Sage to run. It all runs fine both cli browser, however, it fails to run Maxima. The error message is RuntimeError: Unable to start maxima. I

[sage-support] Re: Sage won't start maxima

2007-08-25 Thread William Stein
Could you please try this binary instead? http://sagemath.org/SAGEbin/linux/32bit/sage-2.8.2-OLD-32bit-i686-Linux.tar.gz On 8/25/07, gsage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 25, 2:28 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/25/07, gsage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using

[sage-support] Re: Sage won't start maxima

2007-08-25 Thread gsage
I tried dl/link (twice) - but the extraction failed (errors in the examples folder archive) I may try to compile the new version when I get a chance... thanks On Aug 25, 3:28 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please try this binary instead?