Markus,
Thanks for this bug report, which I've made
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/587
This will be great fodder for our bug squash even this Thursday
at 10am!
-- William
On 9/4/07, Markus Fraczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
it seems there is a bug in the implementation of
Hi,
it seems there is a bug in the implementation of complex numbers. Defining a
number with imaginary part bigger or equal 1E8 gets an exception error.
Best,
Marek
--
| SAGE Version 2.8.3, Release Date: 2007-08-31
I cannot link to either sagenb.com or .org right now, and if possible
I'd like confirmation that they are down. I assume that I just missed
a post somewhere along the line about this, presumably having to do
with the new notebook server setup, but in case this is in fact a
problem on my local
Sage.math should be back up today.
On 9/4/07, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot link to either sagenb.com or .org right now, and if possible
I'd like confirmation that they are down. I assume that I just missed
a post somewhere along the line about this, presumably having to do
Oh, are they just subservers of sage.math? I wasn't aware of that - I
know that one is often overburdened. Perhaps I should try again
tomorrow.
On Sep 4, 12:20 pm, Timothy Clemans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sage.math should be back up today.
On 9/4/07, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
On Sep 4, 5:10 pm, Markus Fraczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
it seems there is a bug in the implementation of complex numbers. Defining a
number with imaginary part bigger or equal 1E8 gets an exception error.
Best,
Marek
SNIP
Hello Marek, (or is it Markus?)
thanks for the report,
Thank you very much! These were surprisingly fast replies! I tried to
run william's code, but appearently my version of sage does not
understand padded_list property:
z.polynomial().padded_list(5)
sage: z.polynomial().padded_list(5)
On 9/4/07, Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much! These were surprisingly fast replies!
At sagemath.com we aim to please. :-)
I tried to
run william's code, but appearently my version of sage does not
understand padded_list property:
z.polynomial().padded_list(5)
Yes, that's
On 9/3/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/3/07, Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to sage and I don't know even if I'm supposed to post such
questions to this group or not. If it is a correct place:
Could you please tell me how can I change the basis in finite field
On 9/4/07, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to define two functions below in order to
do this. If people think something like this would be generally
useful, then it could be made built in to SAGE:
I think it would be nice to have in_terms_of_normal_basis
(of course you
I see that sage is very rich, and I have a lot to learn, but one thing
has got be stuck right off the bat.
I'm drawn to the notebook interface. I've been guessing that it's
somewhat like a Mathematica notebook. If so, great ... I'm looking
for a notebook kind of thing to use with scipy
This is a great question for the email list sage-newbie
http://www.sagemath.org/lists.html
It turns out there is a draft of a document which does
what you want. You can ask there for the url of the latest
draft.
++
On 9/4/07, gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see
On 9/4/07, gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm drawn to the notebook interface. I've been guessing that it's
somewhat like a Mathematica notebook. If so, great ... I'm looking
for a notebook kind of thing to use with scipy (etc.). I write some
text, execute some python, draw a graph, write
13 matches
Mail list logo
