[sage-support] Re: Changing basis in finite fields

2007-09-06 Thread David Joyner
On 9/6/07, Ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks again! I got the idea now. However, there is a problem which sticks me in the first stage and if I can solve it so your code work as prefect for me. The problem is that the instruction v(z) is not strong enough for my popuse. It works

[sage-support] Re: 2.8.3.x build problem

2007-09-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 5, 11:08 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, does the file stdint.h exist on your machine? If so does the following program compile and run or not, and if so, what does it output: #include stdio.h #include stdint.h main() { printf(%d,LONG_BIT); } It does not

[sage-support] Re: 2.8.3.x build problem

2007-09-06 Thread mabshoff
Hi Kiran, On Sep 6, 2:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 5, 11:08 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, does the file stdint.h exist on your machine? If so does the following program compile and run or not, and if so, what does it output: #include

[sage-support] Re: 2.8.3.x build problem

2007-09-06 Thread Joel B. Mohler
On Thursday 06 September 2007 08:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So it seems like LONG_BIT is correctly defined (as 64, in this case) at that stage of the compilation, but somewhere along the way it gets redefined incorrectly. Maybe in scons somewhere? If scons is forgetting something (which I'm

[sage-support] Re: 2.8.3.x build problem

2007-09-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 6, 3:03 pm, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 06 September 2007 08:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So it seems like LONG_BIT is correctly defined (as 64, in this case) at that stage of the compilation, but somewhere along the way it gets redefined incorrectly.