I downloaded the modified tarball. It untar'd without complaint.
However on running notebook() for the first time it bombed out, unable
to find /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib.
dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib
Referenced from:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:15 AM, mabshoff wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:51 am, joel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the modified tarball. It untar'd without complaint.
However on running notebook() for the first time it bombed out,
unable
to
On Nov 30, 2007 2:22 PM, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:15 AM, mabshoff wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:51 am, joel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the modified tarball. It untar'd without complaint.
However on running notebook() for the first time it bombed
Thanks (I really like that!) but... While this approach worked well
with the numbers given, it generated the same error on larger values
of n.
regards
john perry
On Nov 30, 3:58 pm, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
In Maple one typically write f:=x-x if one means a function
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:15 AM, mabshoff wrote:
On Nov 30, 10:51 am, joel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the modified tarball. It untar'd without complaint.
However on running notebook() for the first time it bombed out,
unable
to find /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib.
dyld: Library
Hello,
In Maple one typically write f:=x-x if one means a function instead
of an expression. Doing something similar in SAGE makes a *lot* of
sense, so I don't object inherently to the lambda notation, although
the default Python syntax (lambda) is not intuitive to an ordinary
math student.
Our posts crossed paths. The download was ok, GUI tools were bad, bash
is good.
I will try building from source soon, but right now I'm eager to try
out SAGE and Python!
Thanks, Max
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
I have now successfully started SAGE. My problem was using The
Unarchiver to open the compressed file. (The Unarchiver.app is
available at
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/system_disk_utilities/theunarchiver.html.)
When I used the standard shell tools gunzip and tar to install SAGE,
On Nov 30, 2007 9:11 AM, maxj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've installed the latest SAGE and encountered a similar-but-different
error,
this time when attempting to import module
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_base.
From experimenting with the Python help system, it appears to me that
On Nov 30, 2007 1:58 PM, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
In Maple one typically write f:=x-x if one means a function instead
of an expression. Doing something similar in SAGE makes a *lot* of
sense, so I don't object inherently to the lambda notation, although
the default
Again, I don't understand the bug but piecewise seems to work better using
lambda functions.
sage: f = lambda x: x
sage: fp = Piecewise([[(10,20),f]])
sage: fp.riemann_sum_integral_approximation(993)
148900/993
Next semester, when I have more time, I plan to revise piecewise.
Maybe I can look
I'm not sure what the cause of the error is but, FYI, some Riemann sum stuff is
already implemented in piecewise.py.
On Nov 30, 2007 9:41 AM, john_perry_usm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
One of my students was writing a procedure to implement a Midpoint
Riemann Sum in SAGE. The procedure
Hi,
One of my students was writing a procedure to implement a Midpoint
Riemann Sum in SAGE. The procedure that she devised is given below,
and it looks reasonable enough to me. Unfortunately it generates a
SAGE exception (AttributeError, line 2051 of calculus.py) under
certain bizarre
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:45 AM, Ahmad wrote:
Dear Sage Supporters,
As nobody continued to pay attention to the question I asked in sept 3
about how I want to change the field basis permanently, I am using
john Cremona's idea to ask my question in another way, in hope to
attract more
On Nov 30, 10:51 am, joel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the modified tarball. It untar'd without complaint.
However on running notebook() for the first time it bombed out, unable
to find /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib.
dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libintl.3.dylib
Hi,
Thank you; that solution fits the matter perfectly.
In Maple one typically write f:=x-x if one means a function instead
of an expression. Doing something similar in SAGE makes a *lot* of
sense, so I don't object inherently to the lambda notation, although
the default Python syntax (lambda)
Dear team,
Definitely i'm going to inform Singular. Concerning trac ticket: How
to do so?
You have to ask William Stein for a login and password
tohttp://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/
Sorry for answering so late. The ticket is
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1300
Meanwhile i have
17 matches
Mail list logo
