On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:01 PM, wrote:
Professor Stein,
I have run the timeit command on a version of my program for homework
problem #5 multiple times, with the same input, and the average calculation
time has been declared to be anywhere from 49 microseconds to 110
microseconds. Is
Now that 2.11 has been released, are the older linux binaries still
available, and if so, where from?
Background is that I am trying to install on Mandriva linux (2007). I
just tried a build-from-source using the 2.11 source tar file and it
failed after several hours on indefinite-cycling while
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:02 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that 2.11 has been released, are the older linux binaries still
available, and if so, where from?
No, older binaries aren't available.
Background is that I am trying to install on Mandriva linux (2007). I
just tried
Hi,
I have a problem using Dokchitser's L-functions Calculator. The given
example for Delta function works well, but my own programming fails
all the time. I am getting a strange error message Unable to create
L-series, due to precision or other limits in PARI and cannot figure
out what to do
Thanks for your reply.
On Apr 16, 1:19 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:02 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that 2.11 has been released, are the older linux binaries still
available, and if so, where from?
No, older binaries aren't available.
[2nd attempt]
Thanls for your reply.
On Apr 16, 1:19 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:02 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that 2.11 has been released, are the older linux binaries still
available, and if so, where from?
No, older binaries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I run a notebook server for one of the classes I'm teaching. It works
fine with sage-2.10.2, but I have trouble with more recent versions. It
might have something to do with the new version of twistd, but I really
don't know anything
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I run a notebook server for one of the classes I'm teaching. It works
fine with sage-2.10.2, but I have trouble with more recent versions. It
might have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Stein wrote:
| On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi folks,
|
| I run a notebook server for one of the classes I'm teaching. It works
| fine with sage-2.10.2, but I have trouble with more recent versions.
On Apr 16, 3:27 pm, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[2nd attempt]
Thanls for your reply.
On Apr 16, 1:19 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr
16, 2008 at 5:02 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that 2.11 has been released, are the older linux binaries still
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:27 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[2nd attempt]
Thanls for your reply.
On Apr 16, 1:19 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:02 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that 2.11 has been released, are the older
For posterity, the subtle point that Stein made is that instead of
substituting the integer 5, he used the the float 5.0 to get the
result.
On Apr 15, 11:26 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Reckoner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose I have
In Mathematica, the previous results of the valuations are saved in
the Out[] variable.
does SAGE do something similar?
Thanks in advance.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
Thanks for this info especially ---
I'll have a look but up to now I have no way to install a deb package
Don't worry. Our debian, etc versions of Sage are *not* deb packages.
E.g., get this:
http://sagemath.org/SAGEbin/linux/32bit/sage-2.11-debian32-athlon-i68...
Then do tar zxvf
mabshoff wrote:
Did you run make install?
No, just 'make' (which I thought was as per instructions . )
cheers
Terry
[background was]
On Apr 16, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...snip...]
�Background is that I am trying to install on Mandriva linux (2007). �I
�just tried a
ok, I've tried out the instructions.
[1] On the desktop, the binary file downloaded and expanded ok, but I
get (different from before) error messages when I run ./sage
[screenful reproduced below].
[2] On the laptop, there is no longer enough room even to expand the
binary file, because of the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:21 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, I've tried out the instructions.
[1] On the desktop, the binary file downloaded and expanded ok, but I
get (different from before) error messages when I run ./sage
[screenful reproduced below].
That just means the
On Apr 16, 6:27 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:21 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, I've tried out the instructions.
[1] On the desktop, the binary file downloaded and expanded ok, but I
get (different from before) error messages when I
On Apr 16, 2008, at 3:01 PM, terry-s wrote:
Sage is 100% local. It *does not* install any files anywhere else
on your hard drive unless you type make install, and even then
the install only happens at the very end. In other words, just
delete
the directory where you tried to do the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:01 PM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 16, 6:27 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:21 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, I've tried out the instructions.
[1] On the desktop, the binary file
Thanks for the idea, David. I just checked, and don't have any .sage
or other
relevant hidden directory in my home folder. (The folder where I put
the file
to unpack was ~/sg, and I already deleted that subtree entirely). I
also
checked the .bash_history file and it only records 'make' and not
On Apr 16, 9:01 pm, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 16, 6:27 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:21 AM, terry-s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, I've tried out the instructions.
[1] On the desktop, the binary file downloaded and expanded ok,
Thank you for trying to help, William.
The file I used was marked 'intel-i686' for my pentium-3 laptop,
and 'amd' or 'athlon' (according to sage version) for my AMD
desktop. Those designations were the closest match and not
obviously wrong. On the other hand, there's nothing in the
filenames,
Dear Group,
What support is there for posets and/or totally ordered sets in Sage?
It doesn't seem to be in the Reference manual. Nor is it in the
Python documentation, but it seems like in order to do sorting Python
must have some sort of built-in ordering support, so my guess is I'm
just
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Group,
What support is there for posets and/or totally ordered sets in Sage?
It doesn't seem to be in the Reference manual. Nor is it in the
Python documentation, but it seems like in order to do sorting Python
On Apr 17, 6:22 am, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Group,
What support is there for posets and/or totally ordered sets in Sage?
It doesn't seem to be in the Reference manual. Nor is it in the
Python
26 matches
Mail list logo
