Hello William,
Thanks for your reply! I think I can use your idea to solve my
problem. I tried to run your example in Sage for the case when
x1,x2,x3,x5,x7 are in GF(2). I realized that in that case e1 and e2
should also be defined in GF(2). As I need to do a hundred
substitutions in which all
There are probably more elegant ways to do this, but one way is:
varstring = ''
for i in range(1,101):
varstring += 'e' + str(i)+ ','
bool100 = eval('BooleanPolynomialRing(100,' + varstring[0:-1] + ')')
-M. Hampton
On Jun 16, 10:43 am, vpv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello William,
Thanks
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:43 AM, vpv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello William,
Thanks for your reply! I think I can use your idea to solve my
problem. I tried to run your example in Sage for the case when
x1,x2,x3,x5,x7 are in GF(2). I realized that in that case e1 and e2
should also be
I am sure this is the issue. Your phi here is probably going through
maxima (and probably trying to simplify symbolically) because of the
sqrt() and pi). If you do something like
sage: p(n,y) = 1/(pi*sqrt(2*n-y^2))
sage: plot(p(5, x)^2, (x,-5,5))
it should be acceptable.
On Jun 15, 2008,
