On Sep 17, 12:31 am, Jason Merrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 16, 11:45 pm, Jason Merrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I ever get sage to print something like
sage: (x - x).some_devious_trick()
x - x
Just wanted to develop this idea a little further. Right now, pretty
much
On Sep 16, 9:37 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Yann Le Du [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I tried to email the person apprently responsible for dsage, Yi Qiang,
about this, to no avail, so I turn to the list.
I use sage, v. 3.1.1, and
Where can one find md5sum hashes for the Sage LiveCD?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
Hi,
I'm also interested in using dsage.
I'm involved in international collaboration project developing Grid
technologies ( http://balticgrid.org/ ).
I have one supercomputer at my disposal (
http://supercomp.basnet.by/index_en.html ) and I want to install sage on
worker nodes.
Yann, do you
On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Yann Le Du wrote:
Hello,
I tried to email the person apprently responsible for dsage, Yi Qiang,
about this, to no avail, so I turn to the list.
I use sage, v. 3.1.1, and am trying to build an application (Monte Carlo
stuff) and use dsage to parallelize the
here: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/alfredo/sagelivecd/md5.txt
they were missing, and alfredo will provide them in the future. thx
for noticing!
h
On Sep 17, 10:00 am, 5463 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can one find md5sum hashes for the Sage LiveCD?
Alternatively, the forementioned patches might be interesting to you since
they speed up multivariate polynomial arithmetic over absolute number fields
dramatically. All they need are reviews ... hint, hint ;-)
i know absolutely nothing about patches, reviewing, contributing to
sage or that
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, Pierre wrote:
Alternatively, the forementioned patches might be interesting to you
since they speed up multivariate polynomial arithmetic over absolute
number fields dramatically. All they need are reviews ... hint, hint ;-)
i know absolutely nothing about
the directory points clearly to william, maybe he has just moved those
files, i don't know. those things need more organization... some
day ...
Here is a png file, but i don't have the sources for it available
right now:
http://homepage.univie.ac.at/harald.schilly/sage/sage_poster_schilly_v2.png
I've successfully created a 4x4 4-bit variant of SR
sage: sr = mq.SR(1,4,4,4,allow_zero_inversions=True)
sage: sr
SR(1,4,4,4)
Next I would like to create a plaintext/key pair, which is composed of
variables (say x0,x1,...,x15,k0,k1,...,k15) rather than actual values
(eg. 0,1,...,1,0,0,0,1,1).
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Harald Schilly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the directory points clearly to william, maybe he has just moved those
files, i don't know. those things need more organization... some
Harald,
Just look at /home2/sage/www and you'll see the art directory. It's one of
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Martin Albrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Yann Le Du wrote:
Hello,
I tried to email the person apprently responsible for dsage, Yi Qiang,
about this, to no avail, so I turn to the list.
I use sage, v. 3.1.1, and am trying to
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, vpv wrote:
I've successfully created a 4x4 4-bit variant of SR
sage: sr = mq.SR(1,4,4,4,allow_zero_inversions=True)
sage: sr
SR(1,4,4,4)
Next I would like to create a plaintext/key pair, which is composed of
variables (say x0,x1,...,x15,k0,k1,...,k15)
Dear Team,
suppose one has data that are addressed by a pair of integers i,j.
Suppose further that the occuring values of i form a range 0,...,n.
The occuring values of j, in contrast, do not come in a range.
How should these data be stored?
1. As a list L of dictionaries, so that you can get
On Sep 17, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Simon King wrote:
Dear Team,
suppose one has data that are addressed by a pair of integers i,j.
Suppose further that the occuring values of i form a range 0,...,n.
The occuring values of j, in contrast, do not come in a range.
How should these data be
On Wednesday 17 September 2008, vpv wrote:
I've successfully created a 4x4 4-bit variant of SR
sage: sr = mq.SR(1,4,4,4,allow_zero_inversions=True)
sage: sr
SR(1,4,4,4)
Next I would like to create a plaintext/key pair, which is composed of
variables (say x0,x1,...,x15,k0,k1,...,k15)
On Sep 17, 6:39 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Harald Schilly
Just look at /home2/sage/www and you'll see the art directory. It's one of
the directories you didn't carry over from the old website to the new one.
it's at sagemath.org/old/art and
Hello!
It is a pity that Yi has moved on (at least for the moment), but it
doesn't surprise me: he's amazing and surely working on fabulous and
interesting things.
I did and do use dsage quite extensively--it's been essential for me
in enumerating number fields. I also have access to a cluster
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing an @interact to solve simple 2nd order differential
equations and plot solutions. In it, I'd like to typeset the formula:
show(a*diff(y,t,2)+b*diff(y,t)+c==0)
However, what shows up is
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing an @interact to solve simple 2nd order differential
equations and plot solutions. In it, I'd like to typeset the
Hi Alex,
sage: limit(sin(y[0])/y[0],y[0]=0)
File ipython console, line 1
SyntaxError: keyword can't be an expression (ipython console, line
1)
sage: w=x
sage: limit(sin(w)/w,x=0)
1
sage: limit(sin(w)/w,w=0)
sin(x)/x
This
Hi all:
There seems to be a bug in how the limit() function handles variables
in its second argument. Here are two examples.
Alex
-
| SAGE Version 3.0.6, Release Date: 2008-07-30 |
|
sage: is_FractionField(FractionField(ZZ))
False
Oy. This seems to be intentional: there is a doctest very similar to
this. It doesn't seem right, though. How hard would it be to change?
Is it worth it?
Along the same lines, partial fraction decomposition should work for
rational numbers; this
On Sep 17, 9:09 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:59 PM, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sage: is_FractionField(FractionField(ZZ))
False
Oy. This seems to be intentional: there is a doctest very similar to
this. It doesn't seem right, though.
24 matches
Mail list logo
