Thanks for the quick reply Harald.
the question is, what is .dat. if it is csv like, there are methods to
read it. depends on .dat! python is even able to read from xls.
Actually I meant an arbitrarily formatted .csv-type file (tabs instead
of commas). As I see the python csv-module does
thelamecamel wrote:
On Mar 3, 4:46 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
You are missing a closing bracket and comma at the end of this line
(i.e., ],). The number looks a little smaller as well. Was something
chopped off?
Jason
Oh man, that's what's happening. When I
Iwan Lappo-Danilewski wrote:
The benefits of using R as you mentioned is, that you get an analysis
about the linear or generalized linear model about the errors, amount
of explanation for each part of the fitted result, anova, and so on.
Plotting should be straight forward.
Sure,
On 3 Mrz., 20:14, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:11 PM, agi agnes.j...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
I need a QR-decomposition of a RQDF-matrix.It is only
possible in RDF. Does there exist something similar
for RQDF or do I have to write a function by
Dear support:
On sagenb.org:
{{{id=4|
A = Matrix([[1,2,3],[3,2,1],[1,1,1]])
A.eigenvectors_left();A.eigenspaces_left()
///
[(5, [
(1, 1, 1)
], 1), (0, [
(1, 1, -4)
], 1), (-1, [
(1, -1/5, -7/5)
], 1)]
[
(5, Vector space of degree 3 and dimension 1 over Rational Field
User basis matrix:
[1 1
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Hamish hamish.ivey@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 25, 1:52 pm, Marco Streng marco.str...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm doing a long computation in Sage and I'd like to be able to print
some status information to the screen, such as the number of database
entries that I
On Mar 3, 11:36 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear support:
On sagenb.org:
[snip]
But if I click Typeset:
{{{id=4|
A = Matrix([[1,2,3],[3,2,1],[1,1,1]])
A.eigenvectors_left();A.eigenspaces_left()
///
htmlspan class=math\begin{array}{l}[\left(5,
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 3, 11:36 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear support:
On sagenb.org:
[snip]
But if I click Typeset:
{{{id=4|
A = Matrix([[1,2,3],[3,2,1],[1,1,1]])
A.eigenvectors_left();A.eigenspaces_left()
A related issue is that presumably there are some other places where
the deprecated LaTeX two-letter commands should be replaced - does
anyone know of any off-hand, e.g. \tt or \bf?
- kcrisman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
William,
sorry to answer late:
Paul -- does GMP-ECM have a by-design hard limit of 4095 digits? If
so, then we have to give an error message from Sage immediately (raise
a ValueError). If not, how do we get around the command line 4095
digit limit?
no, GMP-ECM has no hard limit.
Maybe i'm beating a dead horse here, but i think the variety() command
has another bug in it (different from
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4622
). It crashes when working over number fields with the optional
command 'ring=QQbar', possibly because it doesn't first embed the
number
On Mar 3, 3:02 pm, Alex Raichev tortoise.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe i'm beating a dead horse here, but i think the variety() command
has another bug in it (different
fromhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4622
). It crashes when working over number fields with the optional
command
I'm not sure why you are getting different results from sagenb.com and
from the shell, but I would guess that you must be using two different
versions of Sage. Either way...
The problem is that when you divide two integers, the result is always a
rational number, whether or not that rational
Hi Alex,
All the objects have the same general shape as the one posted. The
option (2) it is ok. I do not want you spend much time with my
problem.
Excellent -- (2) was definitely the easier plan for me. :) I've posted
a patch here:
I'm not sure why you are getting different results from sagenb.com and
I typed it wrong. It's in sagenb.org
(are they the same?)
that I'm even sure why this should make sense), you get back a list of
rational numbers. For rational numbers, Sage decides to always return a
GCD of 1:
yes,
On Mar 3, 12:35 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
A related issue is that presumably there are some other places where
the deprecated LaTeX two-letter commands should be replaced - does
anyone know of any off-hand, e.g. \tt or \bf?
See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5433 for
16 matches
Mail list logo
