Hi,
My problem is, how to transform a polynomial, say f(x)=x^2+1 into the
corresponding equation f(x)==0?
For example, I start with
R = PolynomialRing(ZZ,x)
f = R.random_element(degree = 3)
Then
f == 0
returns false. And that's a good thing, of course. But now I want to
solve f == 0 mod 7,
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:26 AM, zieglerk konstantin.zieg...@gmail.com wrote:
My problem is, how to transform a polynomial, say f(x)=x^2+1 into the
corresponding equation f(x)==0?
For example, I start with
R = PolynomialRing(ZZ,x)
f = R.random_element(degree = 3)
You could convert
On Jan 26, 8:54 pm, gsw georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
it seems that there are two different people reporting two different
problems here.
Hi, I'm the one doing the mirror pages. I don't know all the different
types of apple osx systems, so I can only upload what I get. Does
anybody have
Hi!
On Jan 28, 10:36 am, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
You could convert to the SymbolicRing SR where the equations live:
Or you could avoid the SymbolicRing (I don't know what is better). For
example:
sage: R = PolynomialRing(ZZ,x)
sage: f = R.random_element(degree = 3)
sage: f
-6*x^3
Postscriptum:
On Jan 28, 10:26 am, zieglerk konstantin.zieg...@gmail.com wrote:
...
returns false. And that's a good thing, of course. But now I want to
solve f == 0 mod 7, then I would naturally use ...
And for solving modulo something, this should work:
sage: f.roots(ring=GF(7))
[]
sage:
On Jan 28, 11:50 am, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
And for solving modulo something, this should work:
sage: f.roots(ring=GF(7))
[]
sage: f.roots(ring=GF(5))
[(4, 1), (3, 2)]
Just because I tried and failed, could this also be made possible for
polynomials in more than 1
Hello, everyone,
I would like to create a real number from its continued fraction
expansion. I know it is possible to call ``CFF([0,1,1,1,1,1,1]).value()
`` to have an approximation of the golden ratio, but I would like to
pass an iterator as an argument to the function ``CFF(...)`` so that I
can
Hi Harald,
On Jan 28, 11:56 am, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
Just because I tried and failed, could this also be made possible for
polynomials in more than 1 variable?
I don't know. Would be nice, though.
i.e. is there something that can
do this?
sage: f(x,y) =
TimP wrote:
This is apparently an old subject. My new 4.3 version of SAGE can
not open current copies of the notebooks I have in the earlier version
of SAGE (4.2.1). The old version seems unable to download current
editions of the notebook's worksheets. Or--the new version can't
find them.
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note the following important things:
* I have been unable to get any tests to pass on ultrasparc2 machines,
including t2 (solaris) and gcc54 (linux). I am
Bill Hart wrote:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note the following important things:
* I have been unable to get any tests to pass on ultrasparc2 machines,
including t2 (solaris) and gcc54
Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure whether you saw my answer yet... It shows that you can have
full evaluation (as in Python), and still work modulo n.
William was just saying that the mod function in
mod(2^(2^517)+1,84977118993*2^520+1) couldn't easily recognize of the
On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure whether you saw my answer yet... It shows that you
can have
full evaluation (as in Python), and still work modulo n.
William was just saying that the mod function in
Bill Hart wrote:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note the following important things:
* I have been unable to get any tests to pass on ultrasparc2 machines,
I've just tried on an
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Bill Hart wrote:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note the following important things:
* I have been unable to get any tests to pass
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Bill Hart wrote:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note the following important things:
* I have been unable to get any tests to pass
So on t2 there is no /usr/local/lib/sparcv9, so that's a bit useless!
Does this mean t2 is not capable of running 64 bit binaries?
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Bill Hart wrote:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is
On t2 all the tests fail, complaining of the same issue. If I actually
go into the tests directory and run one of the test scripts directly,
here is what it does:
./t-modlinv
ld.so.1: t-modlinv: fatal: libmpir.so.8: open failed: No such file or directory
Killed
So let's see what the script does:
I forgot to mention, the long deprecated function mpz_random has also
finally been removed.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note
So it can't find libmpir.so.8. But I don't see why.
echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/usr/lib/sparcv9:/home/wbhart/mpir-1.3.0/.libs
Total random guess: could it be that you need this to be in your
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH, too?
-cc
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To
As far as I know that is only necessary on OS X. Anyhow, I tried it
just in case, and no change.
Thanks for the suggestion though.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com:
So it can't find libmpir.so.8. But I don't see why.
echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
OK, on gcc54 only the C++ tests fail. But they always did. There is
actually a library missing from the machine which is needed to run
binaries compiled by the C++ compiler. All the C test binaries pass on
gcc54.
So the only issue is actually on t2. Basically I think there is a
whole pile of
Bill Hart wrote:
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
The problem is that 64-bit libraries should never be in /usr/local/lib.
Instead they should be in /usr/local/lib/sparcv9.
I am not installing MPIR on these machines, as I do not have root
access on either. Thus whatever is
Bill Hart wrote:
So on t2 there is no /usr/local/lib/sparcv9, so that's a bit useless!
Does this mean t2 is not capable of running 64 bit binaries?
No, since gcc is not installed under /usr/local, there is no
/usr/local/lib/sparcv9. What few programs do exist in /usr/local are probably
just
Sorry, I don't know.
But I'm cc'ing the sage-support list, whichmight have more people who
know more about Sage's functionality for doing probability and
statistic computations.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:09 PM, michel paul mpaul...@gmail.com wrote:
Next week we start probability, and I'm
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Bill Hart wrote:
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
The problem is that 64-bit libraries should never be in /usr/local/lib.
Instead they should be in /usr/local/lib/sparcv9.
I am not installing MPIR on these machines, as
One sensible solution would seem to be to set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=/usr/local/gcc-4.4.1-sun-linker/lib/sparcv9 on t2,
but this actually doesn't seem to work. I'm not sure why.
However it seems that one can just add
/usr/local/gcc-4.4.1-sun-linker/lib/sparcv9 to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH (it
doesn't
I am logged on as math.cohen, and can edit my notebooks. I can see
all of the published notebooks, but when I click edit a copy I get
error messages.
e.g.
http://sagenb.org/home/pub/1445/
edit leads to
http://sagenb.org/home/pub/1445/edit_published_page
The worksheet operation
Hi,
are there some examples how to use R from Sage?
I tried to search here:
http://www.sagemath.org/help.html
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/
I also tried to search sage-devel, for R and R statistics and R
statistical, but didn't find anything. So the next time, I'll at
least find my
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Bruce Cohen math.co...@gmail.com wrote:
I am logged on as math.cohen, and can edit my notebooks. I can see
all of the published notebooks, but when I click edit a copy I get
error messages.
e.g.
http://sagenb.org/home/pub/1445/
edit leads to
On 28 January 2010 23:46, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
One sensible solution would seem to be to set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=/usr/local/gcc-4.4.1-sun-linker/lib/sparcv9 on t2,
but this actually doesn't seem to work. I'm not sure why.
However it seems that one can just add
31 matches
Mail list logo
