Just tried it and I get the same outcome...
Vince
On 13 November 2011 10:42, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
I almost never use the sloane_find function, but it seems to be in a
very bad mood :
sage: sloane_find([1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21])
Searching Sloane's
This is #10358. Apparently sage-combinat has been working on it for a while
now.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Will this work for uncompressed SPKGs too?
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net!
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
Maybe a silly question, but is something stopping us from distributing
sagenb under the Affero GPL to avoid the situation William pointed out?
It's compatible with GPLv3, apparently.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send email to
This is now a Maxima artifact at
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3437841group_id=4933atid=104933
and Sage ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12030.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Bill, your expertise would clearly be really helpful on
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7344 in that case. This is
basically the problem you are having, I think, except not in the
binary-building side. There is supposed to be a waiting period for
optional spkgs to become standard
I was trying to reproduce this failure, but I think you may have
forgotten to add something. What is V?
Thanks - hopefully we can get to the bottom of this.
- kcrisman
On Nov 13, 6:21 pm, Aran arant...@freenet.de wrote:
I'm using sage for data analysis and number crunching in my physical
I'm using Sage 4.7.2, built from source, on OS X 10.5 Leopard. When I
try to list the experimental packages, or install one of them, I get
the following traceback:
% sage -optional
Using SAGE Server http://www.sagemath.org//packages
http://www.sagemath.org//packages/optional/list --
I see that there is already an experimental skpg for jpeg-6b.
Unfortunately, when I install it, it doesn't help with the Image
problem. It looks like it doesn't install the library, only the
command-line programs. In any case, PIL wouldn't know to use it,
since it figures out what it has to work
On 11/14/11 9:07 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
I see that there is already an experimental skpg for jpeg-6b.
Unfortunately, when I install it, it doesn't help with the Image
problem. It looks like it doesn't install the library, only the
command-line programs. In any case, PIL wouldn't know to use
On 11/14/11 9:02 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
I'm using Sage 4.7.2, built from source, on OS X 10.5 Leopard. When I
try to list the experimental packages, or install one of them, I get
the following traceback:
% sage -optional
Using SAGE Server http://www.sagemath.org//packages
You'll see that I've already made a few comments on the issue.
I think what I should do is put together an experimental
pil-1.1.7.p0.spkg which implements my approach to the issue. That way
you all can take a look at it and see what you think. Because of the
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH issue, the options
Maybe this is because I built the install under /tmp, then moved it
to /local afterwards?
More likely, your machine is configured in some way that allows this,
and mine is not.
On Nov 14, 9:22 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/14/11 9:02 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
I'm using
% sage -python -c import urllib; print urllib.urlretrieve('http://
www.sagemath.org//packages')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File string, line 1, in module
File /local/sage-4.7.2/local/lib/python/urllib.py, line 94, in
urlretrieve
return _urlopener.retrieve(url, filename, reporthook,
Hi,
When I give the command for sage to plot the following cone, I get a
plot of the cone but I also get a bunch of unnecessary dots in 3D
space. These dots appear for certain cones that I plot but not others.
Am I missing an obvious reason, or is it a bug?
Cone([(1,2,0),(0,0,-1)]).plot()
On 11/14/11 9:29 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
Maybe this is because I built the install under /tmp, then moved it
to /local afterwards?
More likely, your machine is configured in some way that allows this,
and mine is not.
% sage -optional
Using SAGE Serverhttp://www.sagemath.org//packages
On Monday, November 14, 2011 10:05:44 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
Does the user doing sage -optional have write permission to the
directory /local/sage-4.7.2/tmp/ ?
I just opened a ticket for this a few days ago:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12018
--
John
--
To post to
This is because I run Privoxy on my machine as an HTTP proxy, *and*
specify proxy exceptions. If I turn off the proxying entirely (in
System Preferences / Network) things seem to work.
So, the code in Sage will work if I say,
% sage -python -c import urllib; print
Yes, the user (me) has write permission.
On Nov 14, 10:16 am, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, November 14, 2011 10:05:44 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
Does the user doing sage -optional have write permission to the
directory /local/sage-4.7.2/tmp/ ?
I just opened a
On 11/14/11 10:18 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
This is because I run Privoxy on my machine as an HTTP proxy, *and*
specify proxy exceptions. If I turn off the proxying entirely (in
System Preferences / Network) things seem to work.
So, the code in Sage will work if I say,
% sage -python -c import
I'd think this issue would affect almost all of the Mac users at PARC,
for instance. Many (half?) in my lab use Macs, and all have our
corporate proxy set-up which gives us access to things like the ACM
Digital Library, etc. Even my Privoxy proxy forwards to our corporate
proxy.
You might
On 11/14/11 08:34, Keshav Kini wrote:
Will this work for uncompressed SPKGs too?
Not without modification. If you can't rely on the extension to tell you
what's in the file, you'll have to use something else.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To
any quick tip on How to List all available matrix constructors?
Maybe :
sage: sage.matrix.constructor.[TAB]
Sébastien
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
Hi,
A friend of mine wants to draw the Batman Equation using Sage. The
equation is defined here [1]. He is able to do it separately but doing
it directly in Sage as one equation does not seem to work. Do you know
why? Can you help him?
[1]
Thanks for the pointer. Looks like lots of good folk are already
working on it.
Bill
On Nov 14, 10:23 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/14/11 10:18 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
This is because I run Privoxy on my machine as an HTTP proxy, *and*
specify proxy exceptions. If
Hello!
I upgraded Sage to version 4.7.2 a couple of days ago and today I
noticed a strange behaviour of graphics_array. It shows only the last
element of the array correctly (with a correct size) while all the
previous plots are too small.
Here is a screenshot of what it looks like:
On 11/14/11 12:56 PM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello!
I upgraded Sage to version 4.7.2 a couple of days ago and today I
noticed a strange behaviour of graphics_array. It shows only the last
element of the array correctly (with a correct size) while all the
previous plots are too small.
Here
On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:09 , Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 11/14/11 08:34, Keshav Kini wrote:
Will this work for uncompressed SPKGs too?
Not without modification. If you can't rely on the extension to tell you
what's in the file, you'll have to use something else.
Check the source for
On 11/14/11 2:56 PM, William Stein wrote:
On 11/14/11 12:56 PM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello!
I upgraded Sage to version 4.7.2 a couple of days ago and today I
noticed a strange behaviour of graphics_array. It shows only the last
element of the array correctly (with a correct size) while all the
Workaround:
sage: f=[f1,f2,f3,f4,f5,f6]
sage: sum([implicit_plot(g,(x,-8,8),(y,-5,5),plot_points=num) for g in
f])
(The eq. prod(f)==0 is really complicated)
Andrzej Chrzeszczyk
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:56:26 -0800
William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
What input did you give to get the output you show in the file above?
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:33:50 -0600
Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
There were some changes in how aspect ratio and figure sizes are
On Nov 14, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 11/14/11 08:34, Keshav Kini wrote:
Will this work for uncompressed SPKGs too?
Not without modification. If you can't rely on the extension to tell you
what's in the file, you'll have to use something else.
Don't tell anyone that I
On 11/14/11 3:51 PM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:56:26 -0800
William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
What input did you give to get the output you show in the file above?
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:33:50 -0600
Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
There were some changes
I just tried building Sage from source on a PARC machine. On this
machine, my home directory is an NFS-mounted share. The build fails
with a shower of messages of this form:
Build finished. The built documents can be found in /local/sage-4.7.2/
devel/sage/doc/output/html/en/numerical_sage
I see that in John's formulation, there's also a space for a magic
number for the file. Maybe that could be used to switch between
bunzip2 and tar, versus just tar.
On Nov 12, 6:20 pm, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 11/12/2011 08:47 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
You can visit a
make test fails as well. This is Sage 4.7.2 on OS X 10.5.
Bill
On Nov 14, 4:44 pm, Bill Janssen bill.jans...@gmail.com wrote:
I just tried building Sage from source on a PARC machine. On this
machine, my home directory is an NFS-mounted share. The build fails
with a shower of messages of
On 11/14/11 5:29 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
This is fixed in the patch at trac ticket #11963, which hopefully will
be finished and merged before the next release.
I think that ticket is now ready for review, so reviewers are welcome!
Jason
--
To post to this group, send email to
I thought that was what it did, but just adding the magic number leaves it
broken for non-compressed spkg's (I checked). The magic number is only used
(as near as I can tell from looking at the emacs source) to decide if the file
is already compressed or if it needs to be compressed when it's
38 matches
Mail list logo
