Hell !
Thanks for looking into this. I believe that I stayed within Sage's
library when I wrote my test code.
You did ! My mistake ! But you actually call
strongly_connected_components_digraph instead of
strongly_connected_components, which mean the function is spending most of
its
Oh yes, and something else about your benchmark : try to avoid using rand
methods when you are doing one, especially when you test such low-level
methods, because often the rand() method represents an important part of
the time.
The best would be to compute all the random number you need in a
Hi Nathann,
Thank you for the timely updates! I agree with you about the calls to
random. I can move those out of the timing portion. I suspected that
the passage to the backend was probably responsible for the slow speed
of the add/remove edge/vertices calls. The cost of method calls is
overhead
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 at 10:27AM -0800, Sony wrote:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{sagetex}
\begin{document}
\begin{sagesilent}
mathematica('myplot = Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 2 Pi}]')
mathematica('Export[%s/example3.eps, myplot]'%os.getcwd())
\end{sagesilent}
\includegraphics{example3}
