On 2/8/12 10:30 PM, Stephen Hartke wrote:
> I could not immediately find a feature to export to SageTeX. If such a
> feature does not already exist, how hard would it be to implement it?
>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> I don't think it exists, but shouldn't be that hard.
On 2/8/12 10:30 PM, Stephen Hartke wrote:
I've been writing a series of handouts for my class. When writing them,
I like to initially use the Sage notebook as it allows me to quickly and
easily experiment with different examples, while still writing most of
the explanations. However, for variou
I've been writing a series of handouts for my class. When writing them, I
like to initially use the Sage notebook as it allows me to quickly and
easily experiment with different examples, while still writing most of the
explanations. However, for various reasons I'd like to be able to post pdf
ve
On 2/8/12 6:18 PM, David wrote:
After playing around in the jmol console, and getting a weird error
involving DOCTYPE, I found some old info on the web, including from
Jonathan. I couldn't find a fix in a few minutes, but someone
speculated that it was a cookie thing. Bingo. I turned on third par
Ah, presumably the whole ubuntu 10.04 thing is a red herring; I must
be accepting 3rd party cookies on the 11.04 machine. I'll check it
when I get home.
-- David
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsu
After playing around in the jmol console, and getting a weird error
involving DOCTYPE, I found some old info on the web, including from
Jonathan. I couldn't find a fix in a few minutes, but someone
speculated that it was a cookie thing. Bingo. I turned on third party
cookies, and it instantly worke
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:29 PM, ObsessiveMathsFreak
wrote:
> Is there no way of getting sage to give back the degree's of the
> corresponding multivariate polynomials as well. That is to return
> something like
>
> [[10,[100,1]],[3,[1,0]]]
exponents() is what you need:
sage: zip(B.coefficients()
* ObsessiveMathsFreak [2012-02-08 15:29:03
-0800]:
> Currently the code for obtaining the coefficients of a multivariate
> polynomials returns only a list of coefficients without returning the
> degrees as well. For example
>
> f(x,y)=10*x^2*y+3*x
> B=f(x,y).polynomial(SR)
> print B.coefficients
Currently the code for obtaining the coefficients of a multivariate
polynomials returns only a list of coefficients without returning the
degrees as well. For example
f(x,y)=10*x^2*y+3*x
B=f(x,y).polynomial(SR)
print B.coefficients()
[10, 3]
f(x,y)=10*x^100*y+3*x
B=f(x,y).polynomial(SR)
print B.
I have a certain integration result which Sage is currently unaware of. I
need a way to make sage aware of it in some fashion, via substitution or
anything else.
For example, sage currently cannot perform the following integral
sage: var(' k t')
sage: integrate(sqrt(1-k^2*sin(t)^2),t,0,pi/2)
in
What y ou suggested all I tried it again today, thank you very much
for the help, I did use the def function that you suggest. All the
help and input is being put to good use.
Kind Regards
Chappman
On Feb 8, 6:48 pm, Anton Sherwood wrote:
> Chappman wrote:
>
> >> Yes I do want a function of som
Chappman wrote:
>> Yes I do want a function of some sort here, but I do not
>> want a "def chaps(u,v)" like what anton has done for now, [...]
On 2012-2-08 02:39, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
It sounds like what you're saying is "I want a function,
but I don't want a function." [...]
Or "I want a f
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 2/8/12 10:39 AM, firebird wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the prompt response, but it is barely credible...
>
>
> Atlas will sometimes do tuning, which means that it will run the same
> program lots of times with different values in order to ascerta
On 2/8/12 10:39 AM, firebird wrote:
Thanks for the prompt response, but it is barely credible...
Atlas will sometimes do tuning, which means that it will run the same
program lots of times with different values in order to ascertain
exactly what parameters to use to get the fastest linear alg
Looks normal to me. Occasionally ATLAS prints some progress status, that
would be more interesting to grep for.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit t
@Nils
Got the animation to work - Really pleased! (Momentarily nothing will
publish - when it does I will add the link.)
Thanks for writing the script so simply. I was able to change things I
wanted to change.
BTW - if anyone copies and pastes the script from above, there is an
bad line break afte
Volker
Thanks for the prompt response, but it is barely credible...
Enclosed are some of the more common lines (with frequencies at the
front) from install.log. Is this what you would expect? 169
compilations of the same file? I terminated the job after that.
526 make[10]: Leaving directory
It sounds like what you're saying is "I want a function, but I don't
want a function." Perhaps I could offer some better suggestions if I
understood why "def f(...)" isn't acceptable.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Chappman wrote:
> Yes I do want a function of some sort here, but I do not want a
Yes I do want a function of some sort here, but I do not want a "def
chaps(u,v)" like what anton has done for now, both for my simplified
and larger problem.
Is there a solution/method to this?
Kind Regards
Chappman
On Feb 7, 9:35 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Cha
19 matches
Mail list logo
