Thanks, using the del statement does work but I have to admit that it would
be great if this was easier to find out (perhaps it is and I've just been
looking in the wrong place).
Thanks,
Vince
On 26 March 2012 04:39, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 26 March 2012 05:12:12
Dear Ben,
I'm afraid that Sage's number field functionality uses PARI heavily, and
the PARI guys have made a policy decision not to try and support number
fields defined by polynomials that aren't integral or aren't monic. This is
one of the oldest tickets in the Sage bug tracker
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:41 AM, David Loeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Ben,
I'm afraid that Sage's number field functionality uses PARI heavily, and the
PARI guys have made a policy decision not to try and support number fields
defined by polynomials that aren't integral or
Thanks, this exactly fixes what I'm trying to do.
Ben
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On 3/25/12 10:39 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
wow, *deleting* does this?!
I duly sought close() method for output, didn't find it...
I wouldn't use the del method, even if it may work, just because it
looks so odd compared to usual file paradigms.
Searching for cvs writer python empty file on
Thanks, I don't suppose it would be worth someone trying to implement a
simpler import/export function? I'm a lot happier with the underlying
python now so it's not too big a deal but for a beginner this could be a
bit of a sticking point (it was for me).
Cheers,
Vince
On 26 March 2012 14:22,
Dear Clinton,
all irreducible polynomials of degree n over GF(2) can be obtained by
factoring x^(2^n)+x, and keeping only factors of degree n:
sage: P.x = GF(2)[]
sage: factor(x^(2^5)+x)
x * (x + 1) * (x^5 + x^2 + 1) * (x^5 + x^3 + 1) * (x^5 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1) *
(x^5 + x^4 + x^2 + x +
On 2012-03-25, Emil emi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've also been using CSDP from Sage lately. I am calling the
stand-alone program, rather than using the Python interface (which
isn't a very good solution).
why? Is it buggy?
I was wondering whether using pycsdp is the right way to go though.
On 26 March 2012 17:37, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-25, Emil emi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've also been using CSDP from Sage lately. I am calling the
stand-alone program, rather than using the Python interface (which
isn't a very good solution).
why? Is it buggy?
Well,
I was trying to install sage-4.8 from source in ubuntu 10.04. I had downloaded
the sage-4.8.tar archive, created the sage-4.8 directory and then used the
command make. After nearly two hours, I got the report (only relevant part is
shown below):
I am using sage-4.8 in ubuntu 10.04. My requirement is very simple: I need
to open the notebook interface, do some work, save my work and then sign
out, close sage-4.8 application. So I use these commands sequentially:
1. ./sage (in the directory where sage is installed)
2. notebook() (at sage
On 2012-03-26, Emil emi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 March 2012 17:37, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-25, Emil emi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've also been using CSDP from Sage lately. I am calling the
stand-alone program, rather than using the Python interface (which
isn't a very
Just type Ctrl-C and that will stop the server.
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:41:39 AM UTC+8, AD wrote:
I am using sage-4.8 in ubuntu 10.04. My requirement is very simple: I need
to open the notebook interface, do some work, save my work and then sign
out, close sage-4.8 application. So I
13 matches
Mail list logo
