On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:07 PM, crushinator wrote:
> Alternatively, is there a way I can make the graphics produced higher
> resolution?
>
I don't understand what you tried and what you didn't.
Did you try the dpi option? (It's in th reference manual...
search "sagemath graph plot dpi option" th
Alternatively, is there a way I can make the graphics produced higher
resolution?
On Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:27:53 PM UTC-6, crushinator wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem getting a graph to plot on sage. I have a graph called
> dg, a digraph on 100 vertices. The graph is several compone
Hi,
I have a problem getting a graph to plot on sage. I have a graph called dg, a
digraph on 100 vertices. The graph is several components. When I plot dg
using the following:
dg.plot(layout='graphviz', vertex_labels=false, vertex_size = 10)
I get a graph where the vertices are extremely sm
Hiya Burcin,
Thanks for reply!
For my cubic polynomials p0 and p1, I did get the following to work:
p0=p.series(x==xD[0],4)
p1=q.series(x==xD[1],4)
print p0; p1
x |--> 1.0601 + 0.59497*x +
(-0.08502)*x^3
x |--> 1.5698 + 0.34008*(x - 1)
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:09:05 -0800 (PST)
LFS wrote:
> Hiya, Probably I am just doing something wrong ...
> I have a cubic polynomial p(x) with "regular" coefficients and I
> wanted coefficients around e.g. (x-1). So I did p1=p.taylor(x,1,3).
> I get:
>
> x |--> 0.085*(x - 1)^3 - 0.255*(x - 1)^2
Little more: I see canterbury is using 4.8. Maybe this is fixed in version
5?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
s
Hiya, Probably I am just doing something wrong ...
I have a cubic polynomial p(x) with "regular" coefficients and I wanted
coefficients around e.g. (x-1). So I did p1=p.taylor(x,1,3).
I get:
x |--> 0.085*(x - 1)^3 - 0.255*(x - 1)^2 + 0.34*x + 1.23
The polynomial is correct, but look at the last
