I forget to say I can't use the show command because the plot is
external in a texmacs session,
this one should work I try it.
thanks
Henri
Le 17/04/2014 14:48, Michael Orlitzky a écrit :
On 04/17/2014 06:32 AM, HG wrote:
Hi,
I do a plot with **params which is quiete usefull to have it as a
com
>
>
>> See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16176 and
> https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/2722/
>
And Maxima upstream already has committed a fix, apparently - great news.
Thanks for the report!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support"
I got it in another version! Thank you very much!
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 6:18:56 PM UTC+2, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Your code works ok with Sage 6.1.1 (apart from a small slip in the
> code you posted: the line
> FFps=PolynomialRing(Fps)
> should say
> FFps=PolynomialRing(Fps)
>
> and t
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 9:39:09 AM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
>
> but it's flawed:
>
> sage: f(e_4=2)
> KeyError: 'e_4'
>
And also flawed in a different way:
sage: f(e_2=e[4])
TypeError: unsupported operand parent(s) for '+': 'Multivariate Polynomial
Ring in e_4, e_2, e_1 over Rational Fiel
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 4:16:30 PM UTC-7, BJ wrote:
>
> I have the following code, which produces a list of polynomials in the
> infinite number of variables e_0, e_1, ...
>
> M. = InfinitePolynomialRing(QQ, implementation="sparse")
>
> However, I've been having a lot of trouble figuring o
Your code works ok with Sage 6.1.1 (apart from a small slip in the
code you posted: the line
FFps=PolynomialRing(Fps)
should say
FFps=PolynomialRing(Fps)
and the result is
x^6 + (973912*b + 2535329)*x^5 + (416282*b + 3608920)*x^4 + (686636*b
+ 908282)*x^3 + (2100014*b + 2063451)*x^2 + (2563113*b
This works for me in Sage 5.13 (I don't have an older version installed),
after replacing the definition of FFps by
FFps.=PolynomialRing(Fps) # the . was missing
However, without the . the error I got was different from yours
(TypeError: You must specify the names of the variables.)
Op donde
p=371
Fp=GF(p)
E=EllipticCurve([Fp(3),Fp(5)])
j=E.j_invariant()
l=13#Atkin prime
n=((l-1)/2).round()
r=2# Phi_13 factorize in factors of degree 2
s=12#Psi_13 factorize in factors of degree 12
#repsq(a,n) computes a^n
def repsq(a,n):
B = Integer(n).binary()
C=list(B)
k=len(B)-1
On 17 April 2014 08:43, Irene wrote:
> I think that this is exactly what I need. Nevertheless I cannot use neither
> i.section() nor i.inverse_image(). The second one because of the same reason
> as you, and the first one when I try it is says "TypeError: 'NoneType'
> object is not callable".
You
I think that this is exactly what I need. Nevertheless I cannot use neither
i.section() nor i.inverse_image(). The second one because of the same
reason as you, and the first one when I try it is says "TypeError:
'NoneType' object is not callable".
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:07:18 PM UTC+2,
On 04/17/2014 06:32 AM, HG wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I do a plot with **params which is quiete usefull to have it as a
> compact style.
> After googling a lot I was trying to see if one can do the same with
> **legend ? or other keyword ?
> I didn't find any answer, is it possible ?
> it would be easie
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 6:32:31 AM UTC-4, HG wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I do a plot with **params which is quiete usefull to have it as a
> compact style.
> After googling a lot I was trying to see if one can do the same with
> **legend ? or other keyword ?
> I didn't find any answer, is it poss
Hi,
I do a plot with **params which is quiete usefull to have it as a
compact style.
After googling a lot I was trying to see if one can do the same with
**legend ? or other keyword ?
I didn't find any answer, is it possible ?
it would be easier to put all in a command ?
regards
Henri
p=plot
Hello,
I want to define a polynomial that I know lies in GF(p^2,'b')[x],
> p=371. The problem is that I have to define it as a product
> E=(X-a_1)*(X-a_2)*(X-a_3)*(X-a_4)*(X-a_5)*(X-a_6), where every a_j is in
> GF(p^13,'a')[X].
> I tried to do GF(p^2,'b')[x](E), but then Sage just changes
OK, that makes sense now. It boils down to this: given an element of
F12=GF(p^12) which happens to lie in F2 = GF(p^2), how to express it
in terms of a generator of F2. This is not quite as easy as it should
be but this works (assuming that you have defined F12 with generator a
and F2 with genera
Sorry, I didn't write it correctly. I meant GF(p^12,'a') instead of
GF(p^13,'a'). As 2 divides 12, GF(p^12,'a') is an extension of GF(p^2,'b').
My question is the same now with the correct data.
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 11:04:40 AM UTC+2, John Cremona wrote:
>
> On 17 April 2014 01:55, Irene
On 17 April 2014 01:55, Irene wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I want to define a polynomial that I know lies in GF(p^2,'b')[x], p=371.
> The problem is that I have to define it as a product
> E=(X-a_1)*(X-a_2)*(X-a_3)*(X-a_4)*(X-a_5)*(X-a_6), where every a_j is in
> GF(p^13,'a')[X].
> I tried to do GF(p^2
I have the following code, which produces a list of polynomials in the
infinite number of variables e_0, e_1, ...
M. = InfinitePolynomialRing(QQ, implementation="sparse")
> S. = LaurentSeriesRing(M)
> Qxy. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
> a=var('a')
> b=var('b')
> k=var('k')
> L=[]
> n=6
> x = 1/z^2 +
> s
Hello!
I want to define a polynomial that I know lies in GF(p^2,'b')[x],
p=371. The problem is that I have to define it as a product
E=(X-a_1)*(X-a_2)*(X-a_3)*(X-a_4)*(X-a_5)*(X-a_6), where every a_j is in
GF(p^13,'a')[X].
I tried to do GF(p^2,'b')[x](E), but then Sage just changes the gene
19 matches
Mail list logo
