Re: [sage-support] emacs' sage_mode no longer typesets in 6.2 (Linux)

2014-09-14 Thread Ivan Andrus
Hmm. It looks like I used a bashism and told it to use sh. But, that part hasn't changed since 0.10, so I'm not sure how previous versions were working. Anyway, I'll get it fixed and we can try again. (But write your grant proposals first. :-) -Ivan On Sep 14, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Emmanuel Ch

[sage-support] Re: Numerical integration and parametic curves

2014-09-14 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Huh... cos(pi/u^2/2), first expression of your problem, has not, indeed, an explicit solution that sage is able to find. but, on your following attempts, you reach for the integral of cos(pi*x^2/2), a horse of a different color (which is the one racing in Wikipedia pages on "Euler spiral") : s

Re: [sage-support] emacs' sage_mode no longer typesets in 6.2 (Linux)

2014-09-14 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Sage 6.4beta3 works as 6.3 : the September spkg doesn't install, the 0.12 works as advertised in emacs. HTH, -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le dimanche 14 septembre 2014 22:03:50 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : > > Sorry for 10 days of silence : we are in the grant proposal season... > > This spk

Re: [sage-support] emacs' sage_mode no longer typesets in 6.2 (Linux)

2014-09-14 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Sorry for 10 days of silence : we are in the grant proposal season... This spkg doesn't install.(see enclose log). Curiously, the 0.12 version I had before trying to install your newer version worked as advertised (typesetting math and putting plots on the emacs buffer). I'm currently updating

Re: [sage-support] Infinite representation in base 2 of a decimal number

2014-09-14 Thread Christophe Bal
Sometime the monkey looks at the moon instead of the finger. Sorry for this not-a-question of the weekend. Thanks. 2014-09-14 16:13 GMT+02:00 William A Stein : > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Christophe Bal > wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Is there a ready ti use function that can give a truncat

Re: [sage-support] Infinite representation in base 2 of a decimal number

2014-09-14 Thread William A Stein
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Christophe Bal wrote: > Hello. > > Is there a ready ti use function that can give a truncated version of the > representation in base 2 of a decimal number ? (0.1 + 0.3).str(base=2) > > This is only to explain why print(0.1 + 0.3) fails with Python3. > > Christop

[sage-support] Re: Infinite representation in base 2 of a decimal number

2014-09-14 Thread projetmbc
Even if in my example is immediate, I would like to have a ready to use function for my young students. I just want to know if I have to write or not such a function. Le dimanche 14 septembre 2014 12:01:28 UTC+2, projetmbc a écrit : > > Hello. > > Is there a ready ti use function that can give

[sage-support] Infinite representation in base 2 of a decimal number

2014-09-14 Thread Christophe Bal
Hello. Is there a ready ti use function that can give a truncated version of the representation in base 2 of a decimal number ? This is only to explain why print(0.1 + 0.3) fails with Python3. Christophe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-suppor