[sage-support] Re: Unable to run GNFS code from Wiliam Stien, exiting with attribute error

2014-12-17 Thread Anil Yadav
I forgot to post the OS. I am running it on Ubuntu 14.10 presently. Previously when things were working, I was using Ubunto 12.04LTS. Anil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[sage-support] Unable to run GNFS code from Wiliam Stien, exiting with attribute error

2014-12-17 Thread Anil Yadav
Hi all, I am trying to run gnfs code from this link (http://wstein.org/wiki/ant07%282f%29projects%282f%29shumow_raw.html) in sage. I am getting following error; *AttributeErrorTraceback (most recent call last) in ()> 1 GNFS_Factoring_Algorit

Re: [sage-support] Sage and latest debian problem

2014-12-17 Thread David Joyner
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:17 PM, wrote: > It's 7, 32bits. > I know this is some work, but can you create a partition with a 64 bit debian? AFAIK, the need for 32 bit, for most people, expired some time ago. > On Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:58:11 AM UTC-2, David Joyner wrote: >> >> On Wed, De

Re: [sage-support] Sage and latest debian problem

2014-12-17 Thread constantino . everton
It's 7, 32bits. On Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:58:11 AM UTC-2, David Joyner wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:22 PM, > > wrote: > > Hi, > > so I was thinking about moving from Mathematica to Sage so I downloaded > the > > binary version for Linux 32-bits. Afaik I should just be able to

[sage-support] Re: Sage and latest debian problem

2014-12-17 Thread constantino . everton
h now that you mention it the file says Ubuntu, but I see no debian binary on the download page just the generic "linux 32bits" On Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:29:55 AM UTC-2, kcrisman wrote: > > so I was thinking about moving from Mathematica to Sage so I downloaded >> the binary version f

Re: [sage-support] Sage and latest debian problem

2014-12-17 Thread David Joyner
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:22 PM, wrote: > Hi, > so I was thinking about moving from Mathematica to Sage so I downloaded the > binary version for Linux 32-bits. Afaik I should just be able to run sage > with ./sage after extracting it but it doesn't work I get the following > message: > > ImportE

[sage-support] Re: Sage and latest debian problem

2014-12-17 Thread kcrisman
> > so I was thinking about moving from Mathematica to Sage so I downloaded > the binary version for Linux 32-bits. Afaik I should just be able to run > sage with ./sage after extracting it but it doesn't work I get the > following message: > > ImportError: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so

[sage-support] Sage and latest debian problem

2014-12-17 Thread constantino . everton
Hi, so I was thinking about moving from Mathematica to Sage so I downloaded the binary version for Linux 32-bits. Afaik I should just be able to run sage with ./sage after extracting it but it doesn't work I get the following message: ImportError: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: versio

[sage-support] Re: How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dmitry Nanyshev
Thanks to all who did helped me. Sage 6.4.1. did compiled and work. I worried ahead of time. Sage is work with Lubuntu 12.04. среда, 17 декабря 2014 г., 20:25:11 UTC+5 пользователь Dima Pasechnik написал: > > On 2014-12-17, Dmitry Nanyshev > > wrote: > > --=_Part_3459_1729769857.14188255941

[sage-support] Re: How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-12-17, Dmitry Nanyshev wrote: > --=_Part_3459_1729769857.1418825594187 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="=_Part_3460_1755857160.1418825594187" > > --=_Part_3460_1755857160.1418825594187 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encodin

[sage-support] Re: How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dmitry Nanyshev
I did not compile source code of Sage 6.4.1. I did not wrote Readme. Now I read file Readme and begin compile Sage. I did not think that a compiling takes so long. среда, 17 декабря 2014 г., 19:00:11 UTC+5 пользователь Dima Pasechnik написал: > > On 2014-12-17, Dmitry Nanyshev > > wrote: > >

[sage-support] Re: How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dmitry Nanyshev
I did not compile source code of Sage. среда, 17 декабря 2014 г., 19:00:11 UTC+5 пользователь Dima Pasechnik написал: > > On 2014-12-17, Dmitry Nanyshev > > wrote: > > --=_Part_196_1883485543.1418819879427 > > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > > boundary="=_Part_197_1832

[sage-support] Re: How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dmitry Nanyshev
Now i compile Sage. I unknown that exist source of Sage. среда, 17 декабря 2014 г., 19:00:11 UTC+5 пользователь Dima Pasechnik написал: > > On 2014-12-17, Dmitry Nanyshev > > wrote: > > --=_Part_196_1883485543.1418819879427 > > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > > boundary="--

[sage-support] Re: How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-12-17, Dmitry Nanyshev wrote: > --=_Part_196_1883485543.1418819879427 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="=_Part_197_1832564421.1418819879427" > > --=_Part_197_1832564421.1418819879427 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding:

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dmitry Nanyshev
Download finished. Error of Sage 6.4.1. binaries, when launched script "sage": *Traceback (most recent call last):* * File "/home/mitpmma/sage-6.4.1-i686-Linux/src/bin/sage-ipython", line 9, in * *from sage.repl.readline_extra_commands import ** *ImportError: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6:

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Jori Mantysalo
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Brian Sherson wrote: Actually, I did -j8. ??? I had -j4 and time says real45m42.247s user146m53.193s sys 8m57.595s This is Dell Optiplex 7010, 4-core i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 24 GB main memory. I compiled version 6.4, not 6.4.1. -- Jori Mäntysalo

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dmitry Nanyshev
Good day vdelecroix. Thank you for help, but I use Sage 5.0.1 and I happy. If you wait few time I write error of Sage 6.4.1. I must download Sage 6.4.1. среда, 17 декабря 2014 г., 16:34:47 UTC+5 пользователь vdelecroix написал: > > Hello Dmitry, > > It would be very useful to us to know why you

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hello Dmitry, It would be very useful to us to know why your compilation of 6.4.1 failed (where did it stopped, what was the error message, etc). At the same time we could provide help on how to achieve the compilation. Best Vincent 2014-12-17 12:21 UTC+01:00, Dmitry Nanyshev : > Good day Willia

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dmitry Nanyshev
Hi shersonb. My time is about 5 hours. Notebook Dell Inspiron 1525, Core Duo 1.73 GHz. Sage 5.0.1. среда, 17 декабря 2014 г., 5:31:42 UTC+5 пользователь shersonb написал: > > That sounds about right, Dmitry. It takes my server a few hours, and it is > an 8-core, 3.5 GHz processor. > > ~Brian > O

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Dmitry Nanyshev
Good day William and thank you for your answer my question. I use Lubuntu 12.04 and Sage 6.4.1 is not work with my OS. Sage 5.0.1 was compiled. Time about 5 hours. среда, 17 декабря 2014 г., 5:21:47 UTC+5 пользователь William написал: > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Dmitry Nanyshev > > wro

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Brian Sherson
Actually, I did -j8. On Dec 17, 2014 12:59 AM, "Jori Mantysalo" wrote: > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Brian Sherson wrote: > > That sounds about right, Dmitry. It takes my server a few hours, and it >> is an 8-core, 3.5 GHz processor. >> > > Then you have not set MAKE='make -j10' or so. (Or maybe -j6 to

Re: [sage-support] How long a time is compilation Sage?

2014-12-17 Thread Jori Mantysalo
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Brian Sherson wrote: That sounds about right, Dmitry. It takes my server a few hours, and it is an 8-core, 3.5 GHz processor. Then you have not set MAKE='make -j10' or so. (Or maybe -j6 to get at least two processor free for other things.) -- Jori Mäntysalo