> Try the following:
>
> sage: e = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).e() # construct the symmetric functions
> with the e basis
> sage: m = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).m() # ditto but with the monomial basis
> sage: m421 = m[4, 2, 1] # create the monomial you care about
> sage: e(m421) # coerce the monomial in
On 23 Jan 2015 21:24, "Jeroen Demeyer" wrote:
>
> On 2015-01-23 22:19, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
>>
>> But I think you should elaborate a bit more since the question was about
>> Cygwin.
>
> I think the original question was native on Windows, i.e. without Cygwin.
This was cla
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:12 PM, john_perry_usm wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In the manual (
> www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/sf/monomial.html)
> there is a nice example of enumerating and expanding symmetric functions in
> terms of x's.
>
> Is there a way to write the monomial symm
Hello!
In the manual (
www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/sf/monomial.html)
there is a nice example of enumerating and expanding symmetric functions in
terms of x's.
Is there a way to write the monomial symmetric functions in terms of the
elementary symmetric polynomials, *w
On 2015-01-23 22:19, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
But I think you should elaborate a bit more since the question was about
Cygwin.
I think the original question was native on Windows, i.e. without
Cygwin. This was clarified in a follow-up post.
Sage on Windows using Cygwin wo
On 16 Jan 2015 14:45, "William Stein" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:59 AM, 张秦川 wrote:
> > Python can be used on windows. And sage is written in python.
> > So why cannot Sage run as a native application on Windows.
>
> Because people haven't done the work to make it happen.
What you say i
Hello,
I'm trying to compile Sage 6.4.1 from tarball on CentOS 6.6 and 7.0, 64-bit
architecture.
Directories owner is user sage.
Following variables are set:
export MAKE="make -j2 -l7"
export SAGE_CHECK="yes"
export SAGE_KEEP_BUILT_SPKGS=yes
export SAGE64="yes"
export SAGE_INSTALL_GCC="yes"
Whi
Hi all,
Can someone explain why there is an error when I try to compute an Artin
symbol which is supposed to be trivial? In the following example, I am
computing Artin symbols of some odd primes in the quadratic extension of
discriminant -4. The Artin symbols of primes $\equiv 3\bmod 4$ are com
Hello,
using Sage 6.2 there is this behaviour:
sage: SR(2).power(3,hold=True)
2^3
sage: 3*SR(2).power(3,hold=True)
3*8
or
sage: SR(2*x).power(3,hold=True)
(2*x)^3
sage: 4 * SR(2*x).power(3,hold=True)
4*(8*x^3)
which I don't know if it is expected.
Because we want some expressions no to be c
