[sage-support] Re: sagenb /sage -n=jupyter

2016-01-19 Thread HG
Thanks... I am confused ? I tried your jupyter/ipython example in sage -n=ipython (version 7 rc1 ) and it does work ! I use %display latex in sage -n=ipython to have latex displayed. Sorry for cuting the example I didn't even notice it. Best Henri Le lundi 18 janvier 2016 17:40:26 UTC+1, HG a

[sage-support] Re: Getting a Symbolic version of a Sum

2016-01-19 Thread Nils Bruin
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 6:35:59 PM UTC-8, saad khalid wrote: > > Hello everyone: > > I'm trying to compare some functionality in Sage with that of Mathematica. > For my assignment, I have to take this series: > > sum((-1)^n*((x)^(2*n+1))/factorial(2*n+1),n,0,oo) > > > And put it into a

[sage-support] Re: sagenb /sage -n=jupyter

2016-01-19 Thread HG
I forget... To improve my english : what "arse" mean ? is it "behind" ? lol And sorry again, I tried it in sagenb ! But now I am convinced it wouldn't work ! Le lundi 18 janvier 2016 17:40:26 UTC+1, HG a écrit : > > Hi, > I can't get no maplotlib graphic inline , is it possible to do it ? >

[sage-support] Re: sagenb /sage -n=jupyter

2016-01-19 Thread HG
It's %display latex which makes matplotlib inline not working Le lundi 18 janvier 2016 17:40:26 UTC+1, HG a écrit : > > Hi, > I can't get no maplotlib graphic inline , is it possible to do it ? > %display latex > %matplotlib inline > import matplotlib.pyplot as plt > import numpy as np >

[sage-support] Re: Getting a Symbolic version of a Sum

2016-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 17:22:52 UTC, kcrisman wrote: > > >> As Dima mentions, the relevant functionality is coming from Maxima in >> this case. Maxima does have a flag you can set to let it try to expand >> bessel functions into elementary functions, see >>

Re: [sage-support] sagenb /sage -n=jupyter

2016-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Tuesday, January 19, 2016, HG wrote: > I forget... To improve my english : what "arse" mean ? is it "behind" ? > lol > Yes > > And sorry again, I tried it in sagenb ! > But now I am convinced it wouldn't work ! > > > Le lundi 18 janvier 2016 17:40:26 UTC+1, HG a

[sage-support] Re: Getting a Symbolic version of a Sum

2016-01-19 Thread kcrisman
> > > As Dima mentions, the relevant functionality is coming from Maxima in this > case. Maxima does have a flag you can set to let it try to expand bessel > functions into elementary functions, see > http://maxima.sourceforge.net/docs/manual/maxima_15.html#SEC80 > It's not directly exposed