> Does anyone have any experience writing interacts for R? If so, can you
> post or send examples?
>
Hi Tom!
In principle, one could write interacts using R. You would just do
@interact
def _(n=(5,[3..10])):
L = [1..n]
a = r(L)
print r.median(a)
Actually, your answer stimulated a much better solution (IMHO).
def test_subs(f, a, x=x):
f(x) = f
print f(a)
Thanks for the stimulating thought.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On 06/13/2016 11:02 AM, saad khalid wrote:
> Hey everyone:
>
> So, I start by making a symbolic function. Gamma(k) is the sum of some
> variables, u_i. Generating the function by hand is difficult, so I was
> hoping I could make it so that Sage generates the function and then I
> can give values
Installing the official Python 3 from python.org will not change your
default Python, it will simply add python3 and
other python3* - related things.
So this it perfectly fine - as long as you are happy to use python3 to run
Python 3.
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 8:46:22 AM UTC+1,
Installing the official Python 3 from python.org will not change your
default Python, it will simply add python3 and
other python3* - related things.
So this it perfectly fine - as long as you are happy to use python3 to run
Python 3.
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 8:46:22 AM UTC+1,
Hi, is there a way to install Python 3 in my OS X Yosemite without messing
up my Sage setup? I would like to continue using my Sage as before (and not
have to rebuild anything), but I would like to be able to work on a Python
shell using Python 3 (to do work not related to Sage). Thank you.
--
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 10:07:30 PM UTC+2, john_perry_usm wrote:
>
> sage: f(t) = t^2 + 2
> sage: test_subs(f, 1, t)
> ...
> TypeError: no canonical coercion from to Callable function
> ring with argument t
>
>
I am not sure why you didn't try:
sage: test_subs(f(t),1,t)
3
Of course it
