[sage-support] Re: Using extra gap packages

Thanks! El domingo, 25 de diciembre de 2016, 0:40:43 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik escribió: > > > > On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 11:20:32 PM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> >> On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 3:38:43 PM UTC, Enrique Artal wrote: >>> >>> I need to use a gap package which is

[sage-support] Re: Grobner bases of ideals

On Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 12:17:37 PM UTC, Simon King wrote: > > On 2016-12-21, jack wrote: > >> Try removing the semi-colon;;; > > No. I tried the example, using different term orders (the OP uses lex, > I also tried degrevlex), but it didn't finish

[sage-support] Re: Universal grobner basis and graver basis of an ideal associated to linear code using sage

Sage has a package called 4ti2 ("sage -i 4ti2" will install it, at least if your Sage installation is compiled from source, other, which gives you a tool to compute with groebner bases of binomial ideals (more precisely, toric ideals, but this is more or less the same) see

[sage-support] Re: Using extra gap packages

On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 11:20:32 PM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 3:38:43 PM UTC, Enrique Artal wrote: >> >> I need to use a gap package which is not installed by sage, namely nq. I >> have been able to install it using wiki instructions and I

[sage-support] Re: Using extra gap packages

On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 3:38:43 PM UTC, Enrique Artal wrote: > > I need to use a gap package which is not installed by sage, namely nq. I > have been able to install it using wiki instructions and I can use it in a > gap session inside sage: e.g., > >

[sage-support] Using extra gap packages

I need to use a gap package which is not installed by sage, namely nq. I have been able to install it using wiki instructions and I can use it in a gap session inside sage: e.g., LowerCentralFactors(FreeGroup(1),1); after the package has been loaded. In a sage session the following code

[sage-support] Universal grobner basis and graver basis of an ideal associated to linear code using sage

Dear group members, I have found out a grobner basis of an ideal associated to some binary linear code using sage. Output contains 2127 polynomials (binomials) in 19 variables( I used degrevlex order). Is there any command in sage via which one can compute Universal Grobner basis and

Re: [sage-support] Re: About inclusion of sage commands and output on word file/Latex file

On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 11:17:00 AM UTC, NITIN DARKUNDE wrote: > > I mean that, if there is any way via which one can get the output on word > and then on latex, in order to include in research paper. I am strongly of > opinion that maths writing must be in latex. > Do you mean to

Re: [sage-support] Re: About inclusion of sage commands and output on word file/Latex file

On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 6:16 AM, NITIN DARKUNDE wrote: > I mean that, if there is any way via which one can get the output on word > and then on latex, in order to include in research paper. I am strongly of > opinion that maths writing must be in latex. > I like the

Re: [sage-support] Re: About inclusion of sage commands and output on word file/Latex file

I mean that, if there is any way via which one can get the output on word and then on latex, in order to include in research paper. I am strongly of opinion that maths writing must be in latex. On Dec 24, 2016 4:43 PM, "Dima Pasechnik" wrote: > This is a bit off-topic, but

[sage-support] Re: About inclusion of sage commands and output on word file/Latex file

This is a bit off-topic, but writing maths in word is not really a good idea. Every worthwhile publication venue in mathematics or CS supports (La)TeX. On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 7:52:53 AM UTC, NITIN DARKUNDE wrote: > > Dear group members, >I have been

[sage-support] Re: unsub

to leave this list, you should use the google groups interface to unsubscribe. On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 9:16:48 AM UTC, Alice Ryhl wrote: > > unsub > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-support] Re: About inclusion of sage commands and output on word file/Latex file

A bit different answer, you can use sage session in texmacs (last working in ubuntu is 1.9.92), in sagenb (former version of notebook but still active, sometimes I prefer it for fine tuning text/latex) and jupyter notebook, really excellent too... They are developing an interesting tool

[sage-support] unsub

unsub -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

[sage-support] Re: About inclusion of sage commands and output on word file/Latex file

The best solution for "serious" documents is probably to write in \LaTeX and convert to LO/Word. And there exists an excellent way to include Sage results in \LaTeX documents :search for "Sagetex" in the online help and manual. This interface is infuriatingly excellent ("infuriatingly" because