On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 5:29:39 PM UTC+2, Chris Seberino wrote:
>
> I *agree* that the answer should be expanded in your example.
> But when you use the factor function it should have an effect no!?
>
That's why I gave the link to the ticket, which you can follow or
participate in.
--
You
What version of Sage is this? It's not clear from the log.
The log mentions iPython 4, whereas Sage has switched to iPython 5.
It could be that the error comes from some stale content in ~/.sage/
As a 1st check, try to rename ~/.sage/ to something else, and see if it
starts then.
On Friday, Ap
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 5:18:34 PM UTC+1, Chris Seberino wrote:
>
> I have no doubt you know about group theory and math in general more than
> me. I have no doubt
> your answer is defensible and accurate.
>
> What I'm concerned about is the young students and what they expect to see
> w
Wed 2017-04-05 00:36:04 UTC+2, Volker Braun:
>
> On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 2:22:48 AM UTC+2, Ruben Zilibowitz wrote:
>>
>> ImportError:
>> dlopen(/Volumes/LaCie/Applications/SageMath-7.6.app/Contents/Resources/sage/local/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload/operator.so,
>>
>> 2): Symbol not found: __PyU
Bonjour,
s'agit-il d'une utilisation sous Windows?
Il y a plusieurs façons d'installer Sage sous Windows:
- installeur SageMath pour Windows (installeur natif, qui
requiert simplement une version 64-bit de Windows):
utiliser l'installeur .exe le plus récent disponible à la page
https://
I have no doubt you know about group theory and math in general more than
me. I have no doubt
your answer is defensible and accurate.
What I'm concerned about is the young students and what they expect to see
when
they type factor( ... ).
cs
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:56:31 AM UTC-5, pro
I *agree* that the answer should be expanded in your example.
But when you use the factor function it should have an effect no!?
(I saw the other reply about rings. See my reply to that if you wish too.)
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 3:04:01 AM UTC-5, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> Because in the symboli
Just try :
-
Z_T, t = ZZ['x'].objgen()
print factor(6*t+3)
print factor(6*x+3)
-
You will se that you need to use the right ring of polynomials.
C.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"s
No
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Because in the symbolic ring 3*(2*x+1) is immediately expanded again. Try
yourself:
sage: 2*(1+3*x)
6*x + 2
But see also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21067
Regards,
On Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 5:47:28 PM UTC+2, Chris Seberino wrote:
>
> Why factor(6*x+3) doesn't give 3*(2*x+1) ?
>
> Than
10 matches
Mail list logo