[sage-support] Re: Running sage 7.6 on OS Sierra 10.12, solve is not working

2017-05-09 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 2:10:38 PM UTC-4, Curtis Bennett wrote: > > Reinstall fixed problem now. > >> Glad you were able to fix this - ordinarily this shouldn't be necessary - you should be able to use Sage without Command Line Tools. But I'm glad it works now - welcome to Sage! -- You

[sage-support] Sage Crash Report

2017-05-09 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Could you please post the crash report, as requested? It was left in the file named: '/home/abhishek/.sage/ipython-5.0.0/Sage_crash_report.txt' If you can email this file to the developers, the information in it will help them in understanding and correcting the problem. You can mail it to:

[sage-support] Re: differences between the "image()" and "column_space()" commands on a matrix

2017-05-09 Thread 'luisfe' via sage-support
Sage interprets that matrices M acts on row vectors v on the left, v*M so in fact the method image corresponds to row_space >From the help of image: Return the image of the homomorphism on *rows* defined by this matrix. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-support] differences between the "image()" and "column_space()" commands on a matrix

2017-05-09 Thread Pierre
Does somebody know the differences between the "image()" and "column_space()" commands on a matrix ? The definition seems the same but the answers are different... Thanx. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-support] Sage Crash Report

2017-05-09 Thread Abhishek Kesarwani
Hi, Whenever i trying to install sagemath on my ubuntu 17.04 it shows the following error: Oops, Sage crashed. We do our best to make it stable, but... A crash report was automatically generated with the following information: - A verbatim copy of the crash traceback. - A copy of your

Re: [sage-support] Bounds in coding theory are still a mess

2017-05-09 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 9:41:46 AM UTC+1, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde wrote: > > 'Peter Mueller' via sage-support writes: > > > The functions and their docs in codes.bounds.* still seem to be a mess > (as > > they have been since many years now). (...) > > Indeed, these bounds are a

Re: [sage-support] Bounds in coding theory are still a mess

2017-05-09 Thread Johan S . H . Rosenkilde
'Peter Mueller' via sage-support writes: > The functions and their docs in codes.bounds.* still seem to be a mess (as > they have been since many years now). (...) Indeed, these bounds are a catastrophe. Names, order of parameters, and documentation is sorely lacking. In particular, none of the