Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread fanxuejun
That means when the length of bite is more than 62, Sage will change its type of data or the storage method..Right? 在 2018年4月16日星期一 UTC+8下午9:15:41，vdelecroix写道： > > On 16/04/2018 15:09, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > > On 16/04/2018 13:15, John Cremona wrote: > >> On 16 April 2018 at 12:04,

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread fanxuejun
sorry, I made a mistake in the value of p. In fact p==68235916425158872634563027. That is a prime 在 2018年4月16日星期一 UTC+8下午7:07:29，vdelecroix写道： > > On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanx...@iie.ac.cn wrote: > > I have constructed a big prime field: > >>> p=68235916425158872634653027 > >>> F=GF(p) > >

Re: Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread fanxue...@iie.ac.cn
Sorrry, I make a mistake in the value p. The value of p is 68235916425158872634563027. fanxue...@iie.ac.cn From: Vincent Delecroix Date: 2018-04-16 19:04 To: sage-support Subject: Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: > I

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread Vincent Delecroix
fixed at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25182 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 16/04/2018 15:09, Vincent Delecroix wrote: On 16/04/2018 13:15, John Cremona wrote: On 16 April 2018 at 12:04, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: I have constructed  a big prime field: p=68235916425158872634653027

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 16/04/2018 13:15, John Cremona wrote: On 16 April 2018 at 12:04, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: I have constructed a big prime field: p=68235916425158872634653027 F=GF(p) Here is what I get sage: p =

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread John Cremona
On 16 April 2018 at 12:04, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: > >> I have constructed a big prime field: >> >>> p=68235916425158872634653027 F=GF(p) >>> > Here is what I get > > sage: p = 68235916425158872634653027 >

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: I have constructed a big prime field: p=68235916425158872634653027 F=GF(p) Here is what I get sage: p = 68235916425158872634653027 sage: F = GF(p) Traceback (most recent call last): ... ValueError: the order of a finite field must be a prime

[sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread fanxuejun
I have constructed a big prime field: >>p=68235916425158872634653027 >>F=GF(p) And then I constructed two extension field: >>E1=GF(p^2) >>E2=GF(p^6) It is obvious that E2 is the extension of E1. Now I want to expression the element in E2 into a vector with the basis in E1. I use : >>from

Re: [sage-support] Cython in jupyter notebook

2018-04-16 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-04-15 16:08, Simon King wrote: Hi! The following cython code compiles fine in SageMath command line version and it *used* to compile fine in the jupyter notebook one year ago: Fix at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25177 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the