Re: [sage-support] Re: PariError: bug in LLL_cmbf [no factor], please report

2018-06-13 Thread John Cremona
On 13 June 2018 at 10:30, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Thanks for checking. In the mean time, I guess the problem might be > related to the fact that I'm using a non-default value for primelimit in GP > (100 instead of 50). > > But if you say that the problem is fixed by the PARI upgrade, I

Re: [sage-support] Re: PariError: bug in LLL_cmbf [no factor], please report

2018-06-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Thanks for checking. In the mean time, I guess the problem might be related to the fact that I'm using a non-default value for primelimit in GP (100 instead of 50). But if you say that the problem is fixed by the PARI upgrade, I consider this issue closed. -- You received this

Re: [sage-support] Re: PariError: bug in LLL_cmbf [no factor], please report

2018-06-13 Thread John Cremona
With the current latest release GP/PARI CALCULATOR Version 2.10.0 (alpha) amd64 running linux (x86-64/GMP-6.1.0 kernel) 64-bit version

Re: [sage-support] Re: PariError: bug in LLL_cmbf [no factor], please report

2018-06-13 Thread John Cremona
On 13 June 2018 at 09:34, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2018-06-13 10:25, John Cremona wrote: > >> THanks for looking into this Jeroen (I hoped you would). The file >> bug.gp you attached causes an error in the latest gp >> (version 2.10.0), after increasing parisizemax I get the

Re: [sage-support] Re: PariError: bug in LLL_cmbf [no factor], please report

2018-06-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-06-13 10:25, John Cremona wrote: THanks for looking into this Jeroen (I hoped you would). The file bug.gp you attached causes an error in the latest gp (version 2.10.0), after increasing parisizemax I get the same error message. What are the *exact steps* for

Re: [sage-support] Re: PariError: bug in LLL_cmbf [no factor], please report

2018-06-13 Thread John Cremona
THanks for looking into this Jeroen (I hoped you would). The file bug.gp you attached causes an error in the latest gp (version 2.10.0), after increasing parisizemax I get the same error message. But I compiled that more than a week ago so probably before we send a bug report upstream we should