You say: "hijack vs shut up, which one is more serious? Accusing
someone hijacking something is a very serious accusation."
I certainly didn't mean it as a 'very serious accusation' like
hijacking people or planes. I used the term "hijacked" as a
technical term like it is defined in the urban
sage-support is one of the best list. English is not my mother language and
sometimes I don't explain myself well but always people here are very kind
and trying to help... It's very important this can long !
Le vendredi 14 septembre 2018 18:00:55 UTC+2, Peter Luschny a écrit :
>
> How can I
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 5:32:39 AM UTC-8, Kolen Cheung wrote:
>
> And if anyone has language issue it surely is OP. hijack vs shut up, which
> one is more serious? Accusing someone hijacking something is a very serious
> accusation.
Since you asked what kind of community this is,
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 13:45, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 1:14:38 PM UTC, Kolen Cheung wrote:
>>
>> "shut up" is language issue? You dont know whats bad language.
>
>
> I bet I can swear in more languages than you do: English, Russian, Dutch,
> German, Ukrainian,
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 1:14:38 PM UTC, Kolen Cheung wrote:
>
> "shut up" is language issue? You dont know whats bad language.
I bet I can swear in more languages than you do: English, Russian, Dutch,
German, Ukrainian, Polish, Yiddish, French, Italian...
And when I worked in
And if anyone has language issue it surely is OP. hijack vs shut up, which one
is more serious? Accusing someone hijacking something is a very serious
accusation.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
*can't
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
If one don't have an authority to dictate, why can't he told to be shut up?
Instead ask him to continue to dictate? What kind of community is this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Snd if someone say something trying to dictate what can or cannot be asked
without backing up with an authority to dictate (such as a guideline), he
should really shut up literally and I wonder why this is a 'language issue".
Did you guys not literally means shut up when you say shut up? Do you
And do point out where's the guideline saying I can ask follow up questions
like this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Do ban me if you think "shut up" is language issue. It must be a joke.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
How's your behavior so good? you are a selfish guy that only want to consumea
others time and ask question and cannot stand people asking following up
question on the same piece of code. You should really have shutted up and may
be mark it as spam but not speak up.
--
You received this
"shut up" is language issue? You dont know whats bad language.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:53 PM Kolen Cheung wrote:
>
> And if anyone is dictating this, that one is surely not you, even if you're
> the OP. Shut up.
Language!!! You might get banned for this...
>
> On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 4:43:44 AM UTC-8, Peter Luschny wrote:
>>
>> > Hi, I’m trying
Kolen Cheung:
>
> And if anyone is dictating this, that one is surely not you, even if
> you're the OP. Shut up.
>
You reconfirm the obvious, namely that you cannot behave.
> On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 4:43:44 AM UTC-8, Peter Luschny wrote:
>>
>> > Hi, I’m trying to translate this Sage
And if anyone is dictating this, that one is surely not you, even if you're
the OP. Shut up.
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 4:43:44 AM UTC-8, Peter Luschny wrote:
>
> > Hi, I’m trying to translate this Sage syntax to Python syntax (i.e.
> using sage as a Python library.) But I got stuck even
Because I use exactly the code shown here as an example. And I did open a
thread posting a direct question on how to use sage as a library but the
question is too general. So I figure I should use an example and so happen
I saw this thread with an interesting example.
So this is not hijack.
> Hi, I’m trying to translate this Sage syntax to Python syntax (i.e. using
sage as a Python library.) But I got stuck even on the first command.
Why do you hijack this thread with a completely different topic?
I'm sure that your question and the answers of the experts are of
interest to many,
Thanks. This answer my question and I put the tip
in https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-support/NFtI5XqjQWg/sz5WPcFMAgAJ
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 3:58:50 AM UTC-8, John Cremona wrote:
>
> I recommend importing anything you need from sage.all since the details of
> where everything is
Here’s the way to translate any Sage program to Python. From
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-support/ZtlmX3zE0b8/cdecLnbUAwAJ:
The key are these:
from sage.all import *
def sage_parse(expr):
'''exec a sage expression in globals
'''
expr_str = preparse(expr)
# print to
I wonder why for me the result is
>>> import_statements(QQ)
# ** Warning **: several names for that object: Q, QQ from
sage.rings.rational_field import Q
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 4:05:55 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:58 AM John Cremona > wrote:
> >
> >
Thanks. This is it. I’m glad we discussed about the channel priority (if
you noticed my original attachment sage-environment.yml, conda-forge is
last.)
I’m curious why this ABI incompatibility are allowed when satisfying the
dependencies. I don’t know if the conda forge formula is written
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:58 AM John Cremona wrote:
>
> I recommend importing anything you need from sage.all since the details of
> where everything is might change in time. This works perfectly well:
>
> $ sage -python # so we use Sage's python not my system-wide one
> Python 2.7.15
Thanks all for the comments. In the end I choose this temporary fix
plot3d(sin(pi
* sqrt(x**2 + y**2)) / sqrt(x**2 + y**2), (x, -5, 5), (y, -5, 5),
viewer='threejs', online=True). I prefer to stick to jupyterlab hub and
using conda to manage it so I didn’t try symlink those from sage in the
Thank you both for the answers. However, I’m still stuck:
Focusing on just translating the first line: R. = QQ[]
In sage,
>>> preparse("R. = QQ[]")"R = QQ['x']; (x,) = R._first_ngens(1)">>>
>>> import_statements(QQ)# ** Warning **: several names for that object: Q,
>>> QQfrom
But if you're reading carefully this isn't what I'm asking.
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Sage uses a preparer to translate things like R.=QQ[] into usual Python
> R=PolynomialRing(...).
>
> In the library code the preparer is not used.
>
>
> On
Mon 2018-11-19 09:41:03 UTC+1, Simon King:
>
> If I recall correctly, there is a function that for *many* (not all)
> interactively created objects in Sage tells how they can be constructed,
> but I don't recall the name of that function.
That is sage_input, which can be used as follows:
Mon 2018-11-19 05:50:09 UTC+1, Antonio Rojas:
>
> The three.js version shipped by Arch is too new and not
> supported by Sage. Either use jsmol (which is still the default),
> or use the online version of three.js (viewer='threejs', online=True)
> (with sagemath 8.4-4, in previous versions the
Hi
On 2018-11-19, Kolen Cheung wrote:
> Then I thought I can import it in Python like this:
>
> import sage.rings
> # OK
>
> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_ring.PolynomialRing_field
> # AttributeError
Admittedly the following is not an ideal solution, but you can do
>>> from sage import
29 matches
Mail list logo
