Re: [sage-support] question about exercise

2020-09-16 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Le mercredi 16 septembre 2020 à 23:39:33 UTC+2, rachel...@gmail.com a écrit : > I dont know how to code in python > That may be the point of the exercise, don't you think ? HTH, On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 5:27:01 PM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:24

Re: [sage-support] question about exercise

2020-09-16 Thread Rachel King
I dont know how to code in python On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 5:27:01 PM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:24 PM Rachel King wrote: > > > > The textbook for a course I am taking says the following, > > Suppose you have three tests in your linear algebra class

Re: [sage-support] question about exercise

2020-09-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:24 PM Rachel King wrote: > > The textbook for a course I am taking says the following, > Suppose you have three tests in your linear algebra class and your scores are > 90, 100, and 98. In the Sage cell below, add your scores together and call > the result total. On

[sage-support] question about exercise

2020-09-16 Thread Rachel King
The textbook for a course I am taking says the following, Suppose you have three tests in your linear algebra class and your scores are 90, 100, and 98. In the Sage cell below, add your scores together and call the result total. On the next line, find the average of your test scores and print

Re: [sage-support] Re: solve and numerical answers

2020-09-16 Thread kcrisman
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 3:20:13 PM UTC-4 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > sage: L[1].n() > > fails because L1 is an equation, i. e a symbolic expression whose operator > is the built-in “eq”, which has no n() method. > > However, > > sage: PP=-625/1000*t^4 + 2355/100*t^3 -