[sage-support] Re: packages

2020-11-12 Thread kcrisman
> > Why ? > > Because there ain’t no bloody option “simpy” in solve. There is an option > “algorithm”, that accepts the “sympy” value… > It would be very helpful for us to see what code you tried that does work in Sage command line that doesn't in Sage cell. As Emmanuel indicates, most likely

[sage-support] Re: packages

2020-11-12 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2020 à 09:00:20 UTC+1, Cyrille Piatecki a écrit : > There are some distinction between Sagecell and Sagemath notebooks. For > instance the option "simpy" of "solve" does not work with Sagecel. But the option algorithm="sympy" does… Why ? Because there ain’t no bloody

Re: [sage-support] Linear complexity profile of a binary sequence

2020-11-12 Thread pedritomele...@gmail.com
See https://ask.sagemath.org/question/9792/berlekamp-massey/ On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 8:55 AM Santanu Sarkar wrote: > > Dear all, > I have a binary sequence > {0,1,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,1}. > I want to find its Linear complexity profile using SageMath. Any idea? >

[sage-support] packages

2020-11-12 Thread Cyrille Piatecki
There are some distinction between Sagecell and Sagemath notebooks. For instance the option "simpy" of "solve" does not work with Sagecel. Why ? I have also observe that under Lin ux the current version is Sagemath 9.2. Is it the current Sagecell version (I dont think so) ? Under Windows we are