Thanks Emmanuel, this is
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33729
Guillermo
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 23:14, Emmanuel Charpentier <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This means that Mathjax, which is used by Jupyter to interpret LaTeX
> expressions, has no definition of a `\ZZ` LaTeX macro.
>
This means that Mathjax, which is used by Jupyter to interpret LaTeX
expressions, has no definition of a `\ZZ` LaTeX macro.
On 9.6.rc0, I get `\Bold푍/6\Bold푍`, which is not interpreted by `mathjax`
either. I don't know how to work around this with Mathjax.
Would you mind filing a ticket ?
Le
Thanks, that answers my questions!
Le 15/04/2022 à 20:00, Matthias Koeppe a écrit :
On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 12:39:23 AM UTC-7 Jean-Florent Raymond wrote:
In order to test something I would like to remove from my sage install a
python package that I installed (and updated) some time ago.
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 14:30, GUSTAVO TERRA BASTOS wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
> Given two n x n matrices M, N, we know it is a big problem to find the
> positive integer "i" such that M^i = N (There are other hypothesis involved).
> In my particular case, I would like to do the same for 3 x 3
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:31 AM GUSTAVO TERRA BASTOS
wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
> Given two n x n matrices M, N, we know it is a big problem to find the
> positive integer "i" such that M^i = N (There are other hypothesis involved).
> In my particular case, I would like to do the same for 3 x 3
Hi guys.
Given two n x n matrices M, N, we know it is a big problem to find the
positive integer "i" such that M^i = N (There are other hypothesis
involved). In my particular case, I would like to do the same for 3 x 3
matrices M , N over F_{11^2} (finite field with 121 elements).
Is it
This is on SageMath 9.5, Jupyter notebook.
Am I missing something?
Guillermo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
