IIRC, some sanitising of MAKE was implemented, as with recursive make such
a setting really might lead to over-parallelisation
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023, 20:41 Nils Bruin, wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 February 2023 at 09:56:06 UTC-8 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> I don't think setting MAKE is a good idea.
>
>
On Tuesday, 7 February 2023 at 09:56:06 UTC-8 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think setting MAKE is a good idea.
Did you try simply
make -j8 build
Thanks! I've tried "touch src/sage/structure/*" -- that triggers quite a
large part of sagemathlib to be rebuilt. It used only 4 processes
I don't think setting MAKE is a good idea.
Did you try simply
make -j8 build
?
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023, 17:52 Nils Bruin, wrote:
> For the trac-to-github transition I decided to move over my git upstream
> and origin. That all seems to have worked fine and I pulled the latest
> develop and
For the trac-to-github transition I decided to move over my git upstream
and origin. That all seems to have worked fine and I pulled the latest
develop and ran "make configure" (was already happy) and then "make". This
worked fine for the most part and with export MAKE="make -j8" it went quite
