mailing list specific to Cloud.Sagemath.
> >
>
> Go to https://cloud.sagemath.com/help and click on the link "support
> mailing list", which links to
>
>https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/sage-cloud
>
> That said, I'm cc'ing Bill Hart, since he us
On 19 Aug, 18:19, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 12:48 pm, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if that is what he means. He is using Sage to load
the .py file, not python.
Exactly. Sage interprets .py files as pure Python, I believe. But it
turns
On 19 Aug, 18:52, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if there is a reason for this. Do the additions break the
lexeme or is there a syntactic ambiguity...
William or Mike H. would know for sure, but I believe the additions
are all invalid Python which happen to be convenient
that exhibits this failure
would be difficult.
I've no idea what the solution to the problem is. Back to the sparc
expert for this one!
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com:
One sensible solution would seem to be to set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=/usr/local/gcc-4.4.1-sun-linker/lib
globally, I believe MPIR will work just fine on that
machine.
Bill.
2010/1/29 Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com:
OK, the problem is as follows. For very straightforward C programs, no
problems occur on t2 because the compiler emits inline code for
everything. However, once the program
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note the following important things:
* I have been unable to get any tests to pass on ultrasparc2 machines,
including t2 (solaris) and gcc54 (linux). I am
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Bill Hart wrote:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note the following important things:
* I have been unable to get any tests to pass
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Bill Hart wrote:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note the following important things:
* I have been unable to get any tests to pass
So on t2 there is no /usr/local/lib/sparcv9, so that's a bit useless!
Does this mean t2 is not capable of running 64 bit binaries?
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Bill Hart wrote:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0
libmpir.so.8 randbui.o rands.o
dummy.o libmpir.so.8.0.0 randclr.o randsd.o
So it's there.
Do sparc machines just ignore LD_LIBRARY_PATH or something?
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com:
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
I forgot to mention, the long deprecated function mpz_random has also
finally been removed.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com:
Hi all,
it is with pleasure that we (finally) officially release MPIR 1.3.0.
It is available at our website http://www.mpir.org/
Please note
As far as I know that is only necessary on OS X. Anyhow, I tried it
just in case, and no change.
Thanks for the suggestion though.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com:
So it can't find libmpir.so.8. But I don't see why.
echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
easily turn out to be wrong about this.
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com:
On t2 all the tests fail, complaining of the same issue. If I actually
go into the tests directory and run one of the test scripts directly,
here is what it does:
./t-modlinv
ld.so.1: t-modlinv: fatal
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Bill Hart wrote:
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
The problem is that 64-bit libraries should never be in /usr/local/lib.
Instead they should be in /usr/local/lib/sparcv9.
I am not installing MPIR on these machines
matter whether at the beginning or end) and this fixes the
problems on t2. Shouldn't this be done globally for all users?
Bill.
2010/1/28 Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com:
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Bill Hart wrote:
2010/1/28 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
It's ubuntu and we can open the port as we have root access (assuming
John is talking about the same machine - which I am pretty sure he
is).
How secure is the notebook server these days. Is it still advised to
set it up in a chroot jail (see my other post about problems I had
doing that).
Actually, to keep everything in the same place, here is a message I
tried to send but which bounced because I hadn't subscribed yet,
relevant to the same machine John is trying to set up a server on.
I'm trying to set up a chroot_jail for sage to run in so I can get a
notebook working on my new
Ah, OK, thanks for clearing that up.
Bill.
On Aug 17, 7:04 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Bill Hartgoodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
It's ubuntu and we can open the port as we have root access (assuming
John is talking about the same machine -
18 matches
Mail list logo
