On 01/25/2012 01:27:11 PM, john_perry_usm wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Jason Grout
IIRC, if you have been editing a cell, but have not yet
evaluated it, or if
you have edited a text cell but not yet saved it, then Discard
will throw
away those changes, and Save will
On 11/15/2010 10:57:39 AM, Colombel Bruno wrote:
Hi,
As sage-4.6 doesn't work, i try to install sage-4.4.4 which was
working on Fedora13 :
Host system
uname -a:
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.6-48.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 22
15:36:08 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
After a new Fedora 14 installation, I ended up with the default
version of Java they use (IdedTea?) -- This didn't work for
Sage/JMOL, either on the command line or in the Notebook. So, I
installed the Oracle version. But both versions are now installed.
I figured out how to tell Firefox to use
On 11/12/2010 04:14:29 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 11/12/2010 05:48 PM, Mike Witt wrote:
After a new Fedora 14 installation, I ended up with the default
version of Java they use (IdedTea?) -- This didn't work for
Sage/JMOL, either on the command line or in the Notebook. So, I
installed
On 11/12/2010 05:49:49 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 11/12/2010 06:43 PM, Mike Witt wrote:
On 11/12/2010 04:14:29 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 11/12/2010 05:48 PM, Mike Witt wrote:
After a new Fedora 14 installation, I ended up with the default
version of Java they use (IdedTea?) -- This didn't
On Nov 12, 7:08 pm, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/12/2010 08:29 PM, Mike Witt wrote:
On 11/12/2010 05:49:49 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 11/12/2010 06:43 PM, Mike Witt wrote:
On 11/12/2010 04:14:29 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 11/12/2010 05:48 PM, Mike Witt wrote
On 08/22/2010 01:56:18 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 08/22/10 03:12 AM, kcrisman wrote:
I don't know that we've had as many people complaining about cookies
recently. Maybe this has been fixed.
Unfortunately, we just upgraded our campus server to 4.3 (the latest
VMWare image that we hadn't
On 08/22/2010 01:01:17 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 08/22/10 04:47 PM, Jeff Post wrote:
On Sunday 22 August 2010 08:07, Mike Witt wrote:
Having said this, I can't help but wonder what possible
motivation there could be, among developers, to do something
like a bug fix release
Is there any way to limit the display range of a 3d plot,
using either jmol or tachyon? (Something similar to xmax
and ymax with a 2d plot.)
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Is there any way to limit the display range of a 3d plot,
using either jmol or tachyon? (Something similar to xmax
and ymax with a 2d plot.)
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.5.1, Release Date: 2010-07-19'
I'd like to to define a latex macro, in a worksheet,
so that I can use it later to do something like this:
html('State = $\\ket{0}$')
I found some documentation, but I'm clearly not understanding it:
On 07/26/2010 01:24:34 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Jul 26, 12:59 pm, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com wrote:
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.5.1, Release Date: 2010-07-19'
I'd like to to define a latex macro, in a worksheet,
so that I can use it later to do something like this:
html('State
On 07/26/2010 04:17:05 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Jul 26, 3:45 pm, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/26/2010 01:24:34 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Jul 26, 12:59 pm, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com wrote:
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.5.1, Release Date: 2010-07-19'
I'd
I'm curious about the intent behind the Milestone field in
Trac tickets. It appears (at least for tickets I've been
interested in) that this field is always set to whatever the
next coming release is. Then, after that release is done, the
milestone is (automatically?) bumped up to the next
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8931
I'm just curious if anyone can suggest a work-around for this?
-Mike
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
)**(1/2)) + C2*cos(x*(-k**2)**(1/2))
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com wrote:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8931
I'm just curious if anyone can suggest a work-around for this?
-Mike
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
On 06/25/2010 01:19:06 PM, S. Robert James wrote:
Hi. When using Sage notebook in typesetting mode, a leading minus
sign doesn't seem to appear.
sage: expand(h_m)
-m^2/(2*n - 1) + m + m/(2*n - 1)
# This is correct. Now, let's turn on typesetting:
sage: expand(h_m)
# Doesn't show the leading
More info:
--
| Sage Version 4.3.1, Release Date: 2010-01-20 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
--
On 06/26/2010 03:26:06 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 6/24/10 6:15 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Right. This crops up in the middle of a more complicated
expression. If I could figure out how to break the expression
up in the right way, then I guess I could search for parts
that are exponential functions,
On 06/26/2010 05:21:21 PM, kcrisman wrote:
I believe that Ticket #9329 was generated in response to my original
post, before I understood that there was a Latex issue involved.
I believe that Ticket #9329 should be deleted (closed or whatever).
But part of your question was also to try to
On 06/25/2010 06:07:02 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Dear Mike,
Just to follow up:
There is further discussion at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9329
if you are interested in saying exactly what sort of data structure
would enable you to perform the simplifications you would like to
On 06/24/2010 06:15:52 AM, kcrisman wrote:
sage: n=var('n')
sage: f=e^(i*x*pi*n-i*2*pi*n)
sage: f.simplify_full()
e^(I*pi*n*x - 2*I*pi*n)
# Is there a way I can get this to simplify?
This apparently isn't even that easy in Maxima.
Maxima
On 06/22/2010 12:41:17 PM, kcrisman wrote:
sage: n=var('n')
sage: f=e^(i*x*pi*n-i*2*pi*n)
sage: f.simplify_full()
e^(I*pi*n*x - 2*I*pi*n)
# Is there a way I can get this to simplify?
This apparently isn't even that easy in Maxima.
Maxima 5.21.1 http://maxima.sourceforge.net
using Lisp
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.4.3, Release Date: 2010-06-04'
sage: f=e^(i*x*pi-i*2*pi)
sage: f.simplify_full()
e^(I*pi*x)
# So far, so good
sage: n=var('n')
sage: f=e^(i*x*pi*n-i*2*pi*n)
sage: f.simplify_full()
e^(I*pi*n*x - 2*I*pi*n)
# Is there a way I can get this to simplify?
sage:
On 06/06/2010 10:43:38 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Jun 6, 9:05 am, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com wrote:
This does kind of reinforce the concept, which I guess I've
heard expressed before here, that you have to be prepared
to update your sage build very frequently in order to keep
up with things
On 06/06/2010 08:45:53 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Yes, there were changes, including the output format, as of 4.4 (about
7 weeks ago).
See eigenmatrix_right totally broken at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4756
Rob
Ahh, well that explains some things. I had been watching:
On 06/06/2010 10:28:43 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
I'm working on a guide. Still in *very* rough draft stage, but might
be readable in Trac (just click on the version 2 patch). Feedback
welcome.
Here is some feedback: (1) This is very useful. I just read through it
and
learned some things that
I'm confused about this, and hoping for some clarification ...
sage: M=matrix([[0, .707-.707*i],[.707+.707*i, 0]])
sage: M = M.change_ring(CDF)
sage: M
[ 0 0.707 - 0.707*I]
[0.707 + 0.707*I 0]
sage: M.eigenvectors_left()
([0.999848988598 + 5.55111512313e-17*I,
I just thought I'd try this question one more time:
On May 20, 10:59 am, Mike Witt wrote:
Is there any way to make the square root of -1 display lower case
i rather than I (at least for latex output)?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On 05/22/2010 08:49:29 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
You can also try changing line 1742 of sage/symbolics/pynac.pyx to
make
it always print as 'i' or any other letter.
I like the sound of that. Thanks!
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
Is there any way to make the square root of -1 display lower case
i rather than I (at least for latex output)?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit
[m...@vector ~]$ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.3.1, Release Date: 2010-01-20 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
On 04/11/2010 01:56:45 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com wrote:
[m...@vector ~]$ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.3.1, Release Date: 2010-01-20
On 04/11/2010 02:39:58 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
Mike Witt wrote:
On 04/11/2010 01:56:45 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com wrote:
[m...@vector ~]$ sage
--
| Sage
On 04/11/2010 03:05:02 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
Mike Witt wrote:
I notice it says this on the download page:
Mirror network is currently synchronizing. Please try again later.
A new release is upcoming. Maybe come back later for the next
version of
Sage?
I don't remember ever seeing either
On 04/09/2010 10:05:08 PM, Alec Mihailovs wrote:
For M, you could do something like
M=matrix([[1,1+i],[1-i,-1]])/sqrt(3)
html.table(maxima(M).eigenvectors().sage())
or
html.table([[r,(M-matrix(2,2,r)).right_kernel().basis_matrix()] for r
in M.eigenvalues()])
And numerically the eigenvectors
Can anyone tell me if there's a way to find the eigenvectors of
this matrix in sage?
sage: M=matrix([[1,1+i],[1-i,-1]])
sage: M=M/sqrt(3)
sage: M
[ 1/3*sqrt(3) (1/3*I + 1/3)*sqrt(3)]
[-(1/3*I + 1/3)*sqrt(3) -1/3*sqrt(3)]
sage: M^2
[1 0]
[0 1]
sage: M.eigenvalues()
[-1, 1]
On 03/30/2010 08:19:33 PM, Mike Witt wrote:
First, note I'm still on Sage Version 4.3.1
sage: M = matrix([[1,0],[0,1]])
sage: latex(M)
\left(\begin{array}{rr}
1 0 \\
0 1
\end{array}\right)
Now, this seems to work OK in a notebook, but I'm outputting stuff
to a .tex file
On 03/09/2010 11:54:15 AM, D.C. Ernst wrote:
Recently (at least I think so), I have been having trouble using
plot3d with Firefox. I get a message that says Jmol script has
terminated. I see that they have quite a few message posted in the
past about Jmol issues. Is this current problem
I have a soft link in .sage:
/home/mike/.sage/sage-code - /home/mike/Projects/Sage/sage-code/
Then I'll say: attach sage-code/whatever
and it would attach the file in
/home/mike/Projects/Sage/sage-code/whatever
In 4.3.1, this appears to still work from the command line, but not
from a
It seems to me I saw information somewhere on how to get:
foo=function('foo',x,y)
latex(diff(foo,y))
To give the 'partial' notation rather than 'D' notation.
I hope that makes sense. The idea is that I'd like something on
the order of \frac{\partial}{\partial y} foo ...
Anyway, I can't
Is there a way to specify default parameters for graphics? One specific
example, is that I would like to specify that the default color for
function plots, lines, points, etc be 'black' instead of 'blue'.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On 01/21/2010 07:35:13 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to specify default parameters for graphics? One
specific
example, is that I would like to specify that the default color for
function plots, lines, points, etc
On 01/21/2010 08:16:22 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/21/2010 07:35:13 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Mike Witt msg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there a way to specify default parameters for graphics
If I have a list of points that represent a 3d curve, how would I go
about plotting them? For example, is there a way to make list_plot3d
plot a curve rather than a surface?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Dec 25, 10:05 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Mike Witt mwg...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have a list of points that represent a 3d curve, how would I go
about plotting them? For example, is there a way to make list_plot3d
plot a curve rather than
On Dec 25, 3:59 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Mike Witt wrote:
On Dec 25, 10:05 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Mike Witt mwg...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have a list of points that represent a 3d curve, how would I go
about
On Dec 21, 9:04 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Mike Witt wrote:
Is there a way to control the default number of display digits. In
other words, suppose I have something like e^k and k ends up taking on
the value (1.23*10^-12)*t. Then when I display this, either
Is there a variable that will tell me whether I've been invoked by a
notebook or via the command line?
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
Is there a way to control the default number of display digits. In
other words, suppose I have something like e^k and k ends up taking on
the value (1.23*10^-12)*t. Then when I display this, either with print
or by taking it's latex format, I get a pretty long string of digits
in the exponent. Is
Is there a problem forgetting assumptions. Or do I not understand how
this is supposed to work ...
[m...@puddleglum ~]$ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.2, Release Date: 2009-10-24 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI,
Can anyone tell me if this is really an out of memory error?
MemoryError: Out of memory allocating triangulation for type
'sage.plot.plot3d.implicit_surface.ImplicitSurface'
This happens when I'm calling implicit_plot3d(). I aplogize for not
posting more context, but it will take some work to
+p).show(xmax = 2, xmin = -2)
to get what you want.
-M. Hampton
On Jul 9, 5:14 pm, Mike Witt mwg...@gmail.com wrote:
var('t')
e=parametric_plot((3*sin(t), 2*cos(t)), (t,0,2*pi))
e.set_aspect_ratio(1)
e.set_axes_range(-3 , 3 , -3 ,3 )
p=point((2,2/3*sqrt(5)))
p.set_aspect_ratio(1
On Jun 25, 2:18 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Mike Wittmwg...@gmail.com wrote:
Was this ever resolved. I'm having the same problem with sage-4.0.2.
Should I be building a different version?
We reported this to the Singular group, they agreed
OK, sorry about that. I now realize that there is an spkg in ticket
#6362 which appears to fix this. So I'll try downloading that.
-Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Was this ever resolved. I'm having the same problem with sage-4.0.2.
Should I be building a different version?
-Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Is there a way to evaluate a string in the same way as sage would
evaluate it? Or, to put it another way, maybe I'm just confused about
the way 'eval' works (or maybe eval isn't the right function) ...
sage: var('frac')
frac
sage: frac=eval('x/2')
sage: frac
x/2
But ...
sage: type(frac)
class
On May 18, 6:08 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Mike Witt mwg...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to evaluate a string in the same way as sage would
evaluate it? Or, to put it another way, maybe I'm just confused about
the way 'eval' works
Sage creates shell scripts like this in /usr/local/bin:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /usr/local/bin/maxima#!/bin/sh
sage -maxima $*
What happens if I install some of these programs (such as Maxima, gap,
R)
directly (for example if I were to do a yum install maxima) ?
I'm assuming (perhaps I'm
On 08/21/2008 06:55:48 PM, Joel B. Mohler wrote:
On Thursday 21 August 2008 01:58:23 pm Mike Witt wrote:
I'm looking for a work-around for the situation where I would normally
call parametric_plot (or plot, for that matter) with a function, and in
some particular case that function turns
This is an attempt to ask my previous question more clearly :-)
I'm looking for a work-around for the situation where I would normally
call parametric_plot (or plot, for that matter) with a function, and in
some particular case that function turns out to evaluate to a constant.
For example:
On 08/21/2008 11:14:16 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Mike Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an attempt to ask my previous question more clearly :-)
I'm looking for a work-around for the situation where I would normally
call parametric_plot (or plot
On 08/21/2008 12:18:26 PM, David Joyner wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Mike Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an attempt to ask my previous question more clearly :-)
I *conjecture* (and definitely could be wrong) that your problem is related
to the issue that Sage can plot
On Aug 19, 5:48 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Mike Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm a long time Mathematica user who just discovered Sage a couple
of months ago, and I'm starting to warm up to it. I have a question
about parametric_plot
On Aug 19, 6:20 pm, Jason Merrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 19, 8:23 pm, Mike Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as I'm here, a 2nd question. Using the command line interface,
is there any way I can spawn more than one window to render different
plots in them at the same time
Hi, I'm a long time Mathematica user who just discovered Sage a couple
of months ago, and I'm starting to warm up to it. I have a question
about parametric_plot.
It appears that if you've got a function that evaluates to zero, then
parametric_plot won't accept it. For example, if z(a,b)=e^(I*b +
66 matches
Mail list logo
