Re: [sage-support] Re: Snowman

2022-01-19 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2022-01-20 03:49 UTC, Kwankyu: > > As I wish that the artwork by Samuel Lelièvre is not lost, I posted it here: > > https://wiki.sagemath.org/art#Snowman > > if the author permits. If not, let me know. Fine with me. You should add your snow person too! Then they can keep

Re: [sage-support] Re: LatexExpr

2021-11-30 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2021-11-30 17:46 UTC, Cyrille Piatecki: > > Thanks John. But LatexExpr(r"\text{there"'"s a way} x_i =") > generates a mistake. John's suggestion was that a string that contains both single-quote and double-quote characters can be enclosed by tripled delimiters, using either '''...''' or

Re: [sage-support] Re: after upgrade to 9.3, SignalError: Illegal instruction

2021-08-26 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Would it help to set `CFLAGS` to `-mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-bmi2` as is done for building the Sage macOS app? --Samuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [sage-support] Re: after upgrade to 9.3, SignalError: Illegal instruction

2021-08-24 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2021-08-24 05:48 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > These "illegal instruction" errors are an indication > that the binary was built for a more advanced CPU > than yours - which does not support certain CPU > commands. It's a bug in "fat binary" build process > we see for some time. > > Build Sage yourself,

Re: [sage-support] NumberFieldEmbedding gets confused with relative number fields

2021-04-28 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2021-04-28 15:32 UTC+2, Ilia: > On Saturday, April 24, 2021 at 1:33:36 AM UTC+2 slelievre wrote: > > Could this have to do with one of the following existing tickets? > > > > - Sage Trac ticket 22008 > > complex_embedding on relative number fields is inconsistent with the base > > field > >

Re: [sage-support] problems again installing Sage9.1 (and 9.2)

2021-03-18 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
¡Hola Anita! You could try the new macOS app, currently in beta testing at: https://github.com/3-manifolds/Sage_macOS/releases/ Let us know if it solves your problems. --Samuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To

Re: [sage-support] Re: Install of sage on macOS

2020-12-23 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Le mer. 23 déc. 2020 à 14:55, Mouse Mousevich: >> >> the MacPorts-specific part would be to create a list of packages to install, >> and put it into build/pkgs/*/distros/macports >> and a similar global location. > > I'm not sure I understand what that means. If a package is already installed >

Re: [sage-support] Re: factorial

2020-11-30 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Le lun. 30 nov. 2020 à 13:37, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:16 AM Vincent Delecroix > <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Le 30/11/2020 à 00:48, slelievre a écrit : > > > 2020-11-29 21:23:36 UTC, Guillermo: > > >> > > >> I wonder what would be wrong with replacing

[sage-support] Re: [sage-release] zenodo (DOI) for Sage releases is back!

2020-10-14 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Added to the Sage 9.1 Release Tour. Le mar. 6 oct. 2020 à 22:46, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > We've recovered the settings for getting DOI for Sage releases via > zenodo, something that was broken for years. > cf https://zenodo.org/record/4066866 > and this is DOI for Sage 9.1:

Re: [sage-support] Re: Installation fails

2020-09-01 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
I suggest leaving the anti-virus disabled for SageMath forever. Should you re-enable it, it might decide to block or remove vital parts of Sage, making it non-functional, and resulting in crashes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support"

Re: [sage-support] Apparently Sage lost Python

2020-04-08 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Forgot one step. Run this: sage -i gap_packages After that, the steps indicated earlier should work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-support] Lie algebra morphism, mutable matrices, basis not defined

2020-01-03 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
: sage: sl2bis.morphism({e: e1, f: f1, h: h1}) Traceback (most recent call last) ... NotImplementedError: the basis is not defined and I was wondering what is the problem here. Kind regards, Samuel Lelièvre -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-support] Re: infos

2019-04-11 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
You may have to install bzip2 and maybe libbz2-dev sudo apt-get install bzip2 libbz2-dev Then you should be able to extract with tar xjf sage*.bz2 or simply tar xf sage*.bz2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To

Re: [sage-support] Re: maximal integrals

2019-02-19 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Le mar. 19 févr. 2019 à 23:39, Nils Bruin a écrit : > > On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 2:04:54 PM UTC-8, slelievre wrote: >> >> but how does one get information in a Maxima session about settings >> such as besselexpand, display2d, domain, keepfloat, > > These are just global variables, so

Re: [sage-support] Re: Weird behavior in sagecell

2018-11-30 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Sat 2018-12-01 01:02 UTC, slelievre: > > Fri 2018-11-30 23:43 UTC, David Guichard: >> >> In this page, >> >> http://skink.whitman.edu/~guichard/sage/two_plots_clean.html >> >> I have two sagecells, each to do a 3d plot. If I evaluate the first one, it >> works as expected. If I then evaluate the

Re: [sage-support] Re: Route inspection problem

2018-04-03 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Have you tried following the NetworkX tutorial? https://networkx.github.io/documentation/latest/tutorial.html 2018-04-03 9:52 GMT+02:00 Henri Girard : > Do you think it's possible to draw fano's plane with networkx ? > > I have been looking on internet but no answer

Re: [sage-support] Re: Route inspection problem

2018-04-03 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Or you can do edgelist.head(int(10)) 2018-04-03 8:00 GMT+02:00 Henri Girard : > Thanks, i must write it to each command but it works well > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building Sage 8.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 :make: *** [all] Error

2018-03-13 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2018-03-13 14:05 GMT+01:00 : > > Thanks for the replies. Great help. Now sage is working properly. :) Good that you managed to get a working Sage installation! Dima suggests to post copied and pasted input and output of a terminal session, rather than screenshots. I agree

Re: [sage-support] Importing extra libraries on SageMathCloud such as qutip

2018-01-25 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2018-01-25 10:20 GMT-06:00 slelievre : > > Le samedi 30 décembre 2017 04:55:27 UTC-6, Manosh Tm a écrit : >>> >>> It will be effective if the Qutip package comes with SAGE. >> >> Manosh T M > > Note: in general, avoid replying to a very old message on a mailing list. >

Re: [sage-support] Importing extra libraries on SageMathCloud such as qutip

2018-01-25 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2018-01-25 10:02 GMT-06:00 Ger Tielemans : > > .. and what about the library PCRaster? > http://pcraster.geo.uu.nl/ > > Op zaterdag 30 december 2017 18:55:30 UTC+1 schreef slelievre: >> >> Note that QuTiP is available system-wide on CoCalc: >>

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage for Windows, when?

2017-05-01 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Henri, could you say more precisely what you mean by "Jupyter notebooks run but do no calculation"? Samuel 2017-04-29 16:01 GMT+02:00 HG : > I installed it on w10 and w7 works fine in sagenb, jupyper notebook runs > but do no calculation. It's a bit slow because my pc-s

[sage-support] recent woes with relocation of SageMath installation directory

2016-02-02 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Dear sage-support (cc: sage-release, sage-devel) (please reply on sage-support only) I received the following question after announcing Sage 7.0 on sage-announce. This is one of many such questions I am reading on various lists and sites recently. Something needs to be more clearly documented,

[sage-support] ideal in ring of integers: QQ vs number field

2015-05-23 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Just to bring atttention to a question at math.stackexchange: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1294942/mathbbq-isnt-a-number-field-for-sage -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-support group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving