On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 4:46:04 AM UTC+8 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 13:06:25 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
[...] leads me to
On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 13:46:04 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
$ sage --help
...
Sage-the-distribution options:
--optional -- list all optional packages that can be installed
--experimental -- list all
On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 13:06:25 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
[...] leads me to believe that it's probably nor possible to install
pynormaliz via
we should remove "sage -i". With source present, make can and should be
used instead.
Without source,
"sage --python -m pip install" should be the only possible option -
basically, install python packages into Sage's python package tree is the
only thing which might work (with usual caveats)
On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 13:06:25 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
[...] leads me to believe that it's probably nor possible to install
pynormaliz via "make" in a binary distribution.
If you install Sage from a binary
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
[...] leads me to believe that it's probably nor possible to install
pynormaliz via "make" in a binary distribution.
If you install Sage from a binary distribution, then there is no relation
whatsoever to a source tree of
On Tuesday, 28 March 2023 at 21:06:26 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Monday, March 27, 2023 at 6:34:50 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
In my experience, sagelib needs rebuilding to interface with normaliz (I
think it's "make normaliz pynormaliz" nowadays, or perhaps one needs a pip
install).
No,
On Monday, March 27, 2023 at 6:34:50 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
In my experience, sagelib needs rebuilding to interface with normaliz (I
think it's "make normaliz pynormaliz" nowadays, or perhaps one needs a pip
install).
No, there is no such build-time dependency. And "make pynormaliz"
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 1:34 AM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> What would the current (Spring 2023) easiest instructions be for people to
> install sage? I'm asking in support of an install-fest for students, so the
> objective is to have easy solutions for giving students access on whatever
> platform
> I'm not sure that's quite enough. In my experience, sagelib needs
rebuilding to interface with normaliz (I think it's "make normaliz
pynormaliz" nowadays, or perhaps one needs a pip install). I would expect
that the binary distribution of sage for conda is built without
normaliz/pynormaliz
On Monday, 27 March 2023 at 17:47:54 UTC-7 Isuru Fernando wrote:
We used to have separate architecture specific builds, but `sage` is now a
meta-package that is architecture neutral (i.e. noarch).
So, you get sage-9.8 for all architectures. We support sage-9.8 for the
following OS and
Hi,
> However: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/sage seems to indicate that
various architecture-specific builds are woefully outdated: "noarch" seems
to be on point, but the architecture-specific ones seem stuck on 9.2. Am I
reading the info wrong? Obviously I don't want to point people to 9.2
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 5:34 PM Nils Bruin wrote:
> What would the current (Spring 2023) easiest instructions be for people to
> install sage? I'm asking in support of an install-fest for students, so the
> objective is to have easy solutions for giving students access on whatever
> platform
What would the current (Spring 2023) easiest instructions be for people to
install sage? I'm asking in support of an install-fest for students, so the
objective is to have easy solutions for giving students access on whatever
platform they have available.
I know about cloud-based solutions, so
14 matches
Mail list logo
