The problem is indeed fixed by applying #13951 (which still needs
reviewing).
Peter
Op vrijdag 8 november 2013 17:35:01 UTC schreef John Cremona:
On 8 November 2013 16:11, Georgi Guninski guni...@guninski.comjavascript:
wrote:
I am not an expert, but is it normal to get negative
On 22 November 2013 17:46, Peter Bruin pjbr...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is indeed fixed by applying #13951 (which still needs
reviewing).
As Peter and I are both already authors and reviewers of the patcheson
that ticket, we should probably find a third party to finish the
review.
John
On 2013-11-22 20:52, John Cremona wrote:
On 22 November 2013 17:46, Peter Bruin pjbr...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is indeed fixed by applying #13951 (which still needs
reviewing).
As Peter and I are both already authors and reviewers of the patcheson
that ticket, we should probably find a
I am not an expert, but is it normal to get negative canonical
height of a point on elliptic curve over number field?
sage: Z1.Z=ZZ[];Nf.v=NumberField(Z**16-2);E=EllipticCurve(Nf,[-87, 504,
-40320, 0, 0]);P=E(0,0)
sage: P.height() #not very fast
-0.150688795814905
sage: P.height(precision=2000)
