On Nov 20, 2007 7:37 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm... I just tested it on a newer version, and I get the incorrect
> answer. I'll look into it more.
>
It was similar to but not identical to 987 -- or more, it was that the fix
for #987 wasn't sufficient. This is now fixd in
Hmm... I just tested it on a newer version, and I get the incorrect
answer. I'll look into it more.
--Mike
On Nov 20, 2007 7:03 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is ticket #987 which was fixed in 2.8.9.
>
> --Mike
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2007 5:37 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is ticket #987 which was fixed in 2.8.9.
--Mike
On Nov 20, 2007 5:37 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2007 8:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > As far as i know, length of curve, defined as
> > f(x)
> > from a to b (a <= x <= b) is
> > L
On Nov 20, 2007 8:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As far as i know, length of curve, defined as
> f(x)
> from a to b (a <= x <= b) is
> L = integral from a to b of sqrt(1 + df(x)^2)dx
> where df(x) is diff(f,x)
>
> for f(x) = y = x^2 , a=0, b=2 it should be
> df(x)=2x
> sqr
